 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Anyone,
I do not see the wisdom in beating a dead horse. My idea is to use the same tactics that the enemies of liberty use to enslave their victims, and they use repetition to reinforce specific angles of view.
A victim may be exposed to the same message through magazine articles, books, newspaper articles, radio broadcasts, television shows, as the basic principle is repeated over, and over, and over, and the effect is something called "gaining currency" as the message spreads like a popular song.
The Legal Crime message is one word:
Obey
There is no need to expand upon that theme other than variety, or boredom, that is the essence of the message, it is all that is needed, so long as there is no opposition - no competition. So long as there is no power left to oppose the one message.
Obey
What happens if the intended victims invent a competitive alternative?
The message remains the same, but the message must then be sugar coated by some means. The words "sugar coating" exemplify the process, actually, because the accurate work is "falsify".
The message is Obey.
When opposition to obedience is encountered by those who produce and enforce the message the response is to falsify the message.
The message remains the same thing; falsification is used to nullify opposition to obedience.
What happens if the targeted victims continue to oppose obedience even as falsification reaches over-abundance; what happens when falsification is so ubiquitous that concepts such as good and evil, right and wrong, liberty and slavery, war and peace, truth and fiction, are ambiguous concepts, mysteries, grey area, and opposites in meaning?
What happens when war is peace?
What happens when right is wrong?
What happens when truth is fiction?
What happens when liberty is slavery?
What happens when right is wrong?
What happens when torture is fun?
What happens when life is death?
If we are all not dead, by then, it may be a good idea to begin using the same tactic that moved things to this point, to move things back the other way, and to do that, it may be necessary to be as diligent, to be as tenacious, and to be as consistent, deliberate, and repetitive, in reinforcing the exposure of falsehood, and reinforcing a more accurate viewpoint of reality.
If the idea is to support The Constitution and to depend upon The Dollar to do so, then how can such a goal explain the actual history of The Constitution and The Dollar?
The Constitution enabled what we have now, going back to it, may be the lesser of two evils, assuming that getting back to it is possible, which is a huge assumption since The Constitution is the thing preventing "us" from getting back to "our" control of The Constitution, by design, but assuming that it is possible to get back to limited government, limited by The Constitution, what happens once "we" reach back to that preferred limit of government, when, The Dollar still gives free, and unlimited, access to the production of surplus wealth to the legal criminals?
In other words, where to "we" get the power to regain, and limit, the Nation State (enabled to be a Nation State by The Constitution enabling documentation), while our power to survive is stolen from us through the legal money monopoly fraud dollar system of extortion?
"We" can't accumulate enough power to pay off our debt, by design, let alone have enough power to oppose those who steal our power.
Who has enough power to spare, to use excess power in the work of opposing criminal legal power?
The people who have managed to use the legal criminal power system, so as to take their piece of the pie, are now complaining about their system of extortion, and now they want to stem the accelerating rate of acceleration toward absolute despotism, because too many fellow legal criminals are having too much trouble squeezing their division of the booty from the shrinking supply of honest, productive, gullible, and stupid victims?
The worst of the worst on the top of the pyramid scheme are ordering too much obedience from the actual productive group, the leadership of the parasites are too greedy, and the lower level parasites are unhappy about their shrinking supply of profits, and now there are divisions occurring among the ranks of the parasites?
Where are you going to stash your booty, as the criminal income stream dries up, so as to avoid being forced down into the class of victims?
What explains the complete lack of ignorance concerning the historical fraud behind The Constitution and The Dollar unit of currency?
Why does anyone support legal crime?
Is it ignorance?
It isn't ignorance once the accurate facts are understood by the ignorant, and then the ignorant is no longer ignorant, and if then the no-longer-ignorant still support legal crime, the only other option is willful support of legal crime.
What explains a lack of response to information that exposes support for legal crime?
A response will confess awareness of the accurate information, and such a confession will blow off the false cover, and once the false cover is blown off, the confession confesses the truth, that the person does, in fact, support legal crime - for whatever reason.
If a person works at challenging the National government, be aware, that person opposes an official, lawful, interpretation of The Constitution, and this has already occurred on occasions such as The Whiskey Rebellion, The Alien and Sedition Acts, The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions, The Civil War, and other examples.
The Constitution was designed by Monarchists, Dictator's to be, hiding behind a false front of Federalism, and it was designed to be constructively interpreted, and both The Declaration of Independence, and The Bill of Rights are diametrically opposed to that legal crime document.
A. The Declaration of Independence (enabling document used to explain resistance to criminal government)
B. The Constitution (enabling document used to excuse the use of government to commit crimes, including the suppression of rebellions that are examples of resistance to criminal governments)
C. The Bill of Rights (a last ditch effort by the falsely labeled Anti-Federalists to resist the criminal empowering Constitution)
What happens when those facts are reported to someone and the person who then knows those facts decide to continue supporting, without reservation, The Constitution?
What does that confess about that person, if that person is known, beyond a shadow of doubt, to be a person who knows those accurate facts?
The Constitution was designed to be a fraud, was fraudulently imposed upon the ignorant masses, and it continues to be the enabling document used by the current criminals to steal as much power from the honest productive people in America as can be stolen, and then use that stolen power to accomplish the goals of all organized criminals.
1. Limit the production of power down to a manageable level; failure to do so will enable the victims to overpower their oppressors.
2. Incorporate all criminal powers into one exclusive dominant power; recruit willing, and welcome, fellow criminals; in one word: Monopoly
3. Destroy competition where ever and when ever competition arises; failure to do so will force the quality of everything produced up, including the production of moral government, and including the production of accurate, and powerful, money, and honest, productive, competition will force cost down, again, even the cost of moral government will be forced down, and again, even the cost of accurate, and powerful, money cost (interest) will be forced down; failure to destroy competition, by definition, destroys monopoly.
If going back to The Constitution is a goal, the lesser of two evils, such a goal can be understood as such; but claiming that The Constitution was, is, or will be a moral law is either ignorant, or it is a false claim done on purpose for some un-confessed, true, motive.
Keeping the dollar, along with all the debt recorded within that legal system of money, as if honest productive people are somehow morally held accountable for the crimes committed by the legal criminals who stole the power produced by the honest productive Americans who are connected to that legal crime in progress, can be a goal.
Keeping the dollar can be a goal.
Paying the debts caused by those who ran, and are still running, for now, The Dollar Hegemony, can be a goal.
Why is that a goal?
Why would anyone supporting that goal fail to answer my questions?
Honest productive American people are the source of The Good Faith and Credit of The United States of America. Honest productive American people create the stuff that was borrowed. Who owes whom, what?
Who is claiming that they are owed something from whom?
Who borrowed money from the capacity of the honest productive American people?
If someone borrowed money from the capacity of the honest productive American people, then that person has a name, and if there is more than one person who has done that, then there are more names of people who have borrowed money from the capacity of the honest productive American people.
Do you still have a brain in your head? Can you comprehend the difference between a Creditor and a Debtor?
The Debtor is the person who borrows the money from a Creditor.
LOOK:
http://www.usdebtclock.org/
Who owes whom?
Who borrowed from whom?
Who is the beneficiary?
Why is finance complicated beyond the capacity of an honest productive American to know the simple difference between a person who borrows money and a person who lends money?
Do you think that you owe someone, anyone, any money, if you did not ask to borrow anything from anyone?
Even if you think that you owe someone for the home mortgage that you did ask for, sign for, and receive, because that is the way things were done in America, why can't you now know that there are options to that system of fraud; whereby you have to buy two houses, not one, and a second entire home cost is paid by you in interest to someone else, and that constitutes, in real terms, a crime.
What on earth explains the requirement of an honest productive American, who has earned, is earning, and will earn Good Faith and Credit, to have to come up with twice as much earnings to buy one home?
Who is lying to whom?
Who is believing, and living, such lies; actually to the point that people hire known liars to lie, and then actually taking on a second job, so as to afford an unimaginably powerful reward awarded to the most efficient criminals who are hired to lie?
Who is the debtor? Who borrowed the money that is recorded as that National Debt? Who is the creditor? Who loaned the money? Who is owed all that money that was borrowed?
Can you see the big lie yet? Have you looked yet at Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports yet? Do you still believe the lie that the hired liars keep repeating, over, and over again, that we are broke, and that "we" have borrowed to much money from someone, and that if "we" don't pay back all that money, plus interest, to that person that "we" borrowed all that money from, then "we" are in big, big, trouble?
Do you actually believe that lie; because the liars you hired to lie to you are really, really, good at lying to you?
Really?
Explain to me, please, why no one answers my questions. I've been at this for decades. You may just be beginning to see things I've been seeing for decades, and no one answers; where are your "authorities"?
Product 1 is a no interest home mortgage loan to anyone on the planet who has earned, does earn, and will earn good faith and credit. What is wrong with such a product?
Will one of your hire liars claim that there is no demand for such a thing?
Will one of your hired liars claim that such a thing isn't profitable enough to attract that mysterious entrepreneurial spirit?
Would you buy Product 1?
If you could submit a competitive bid to gain a license to produce and maintain the product 1, and product 2, paper work, could you, and would you do so if you knew how much potential income was going to flow into your person bank account as everyone who buys Product 2 sends you a 1% "piece of the action", as they use that Good Faith and Credit to produce more and more and more surplus wealth?
How about some numbers?
If Product 2 is on the shelf at the bank and you walk in and you "go for it" and you buy enough Good Faith and Credit, at 1% interest, to rig your home, in California, to begin using the Sun to make electricity, and you then make enough electricity to run your home, and enough to pay back the loan, and enough to sell, so as to generate a steady income, then you do that yourself, and what happens of similar people do similar things across America; and look at a few numbers.
Suppose that 1 million people buy Product 2 from you. You also have to process all the Product 1 loans you are selling (give away the razor), so as to sell Product 2 (so as to sell the razor blades), and then suppose that the average loan is a 30 year loan, low monthly payment, and the average loan amount is 1,000 dollars.
1,000,000 (1 million people)
1,000 (1 thousand dollars)
6 zeros added to 3 zeros equals 9 zeros.
1,000,000,000
Divided by 1% (we are now doing "high finance" as stupid as we are, we can do it, if we want to, if we are so bold, so incredible audacious)
Stumped?
How about cheating with a calculator, or just take 2 zeros off the total, whichever works for you, or do both.
I'll do the calculator first (there is one on this computer)
1000000000 x .01 = 10000000
The zeros are small and hard to count, I count 7.
Now the take away 2 zeros method:
10,000,000
A licensed franchise Product 1, and Product 2, producer, and maintainer, seller, and profiteer, can make 10 million dollars, in 30 years, for doing what - exactly?
An on-line computer program, with encrypted, backed-up encrypted, mirrored, and mutually exclusive encoded software programs, or some such already well used hardware and software, can automate almost all of the human labor, and so, what explains the cost of the loan, and is that, conceivably, a profitable venture able to inspire an entrepreneurial spirit?
Is that the official denouncement of my illustrated example of legal monetary competition: that there is no demand for such a thing, that such a thing will cost too much, no one will buy into it, it does not inspire growth, it does not afford profitability?
10,000,000 dollars (not dollars, exactly, some other unit of currency so as to disconnect from The Dollar Hegemony extortion racket whereby the creditors have been fooled into thinking they are the debtors)
10,000,000 dollars, over 30 years, for maintaining a licensed, automated, networked, computer program?
Do you think that Microsoft, Google, Paypal, Skype, Amazon.com, and other "legal fictions" will be falling over each other to submit a higher quality and lower cost bid for their license? How many licenses are needed?
Currently there is one license. Currently the holders of the one license to "print" legal money have awarded themselves said license, and that group have also given themselves the license to use that money printing license to steal all the surplus wealth that can possibly be stolen, and they give themselves, each new top boss in turn, a license to torture, to mass murder, and to threaten the human species with extinction.
And the ignorant masses prefer ignorance, which is a stupid decision, but one that is ordered; as part of the one order to be obeyed.
Obey
There is no other option.