 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Honest productive Americans,
The link above exemplifies the cost of falsehood; when honest productive people are misdirected they will work to solve a problem by employing the cause of the problem.
If the problem is accurately identified as the abuse of punishment to enforce debt collection, then what is the solution?
A debtor fails to pay a debt, a debt collector then gains access to a legal enforcer, the legal enforcer then captures, arrests, or otherwise imprisons the debtor for failing to pay a debt, and in case of resistance to arrest, the punishment routine escalates as the legal enforcer is trained to enforce the law, and the legal enforcer is not trained to be overpowered by those who the legal enforcer has targeted.
I know, my words appear to be foreign, to many, as if I spoke in a foreign language, but I am informing you of the need to regain control of our common language.
If the law enforcer is worth anything the law enforcer will overpower the object of his, or her, attention, not the opposite, and therefore it is vital to employ law enforcers in moral work, not "just" legal work.
Laws can obviously be immoral, as those who write laws are typically those who are known liars, such is the State of our (involuntary) Union.
It is past time to declare a war on Falsehood, and begin taking back the control we lost over our language.
If it is acceptable to punish those who fail to repay loans then why would anyone ever decide to start at the bottom and work their way up?
If it is acceptable, moral, lawful, legal, right, and even a majority rule, to employ the law power in the work of punishing those who are found guilty of failing to repay loans, then, having established that goal, why not start at the top and work down from the top, to see if the idea works, instead of starting at the bottom, where the evidence that must be used to establish working, or not working, facts are small, insignificant, and ambiguous numbers.
Why start arresting, and imprisoning, and punishing, dime and nickle debtors, when there are trillion dollar debtors accused, and confessed, in abundance?
The FED people borrow money from The Good Faith and Credit of The American Tax Payers, also knowable as the honest productive people of America, the only source of surplus wealth, the place where the value of legal money is produced.
When did The FED people make their last payment back into the fund from which they borrow the money they borrow, and the same money they lend, or sell, to other people so as to profit by that use of that money?
The FED people borrow trillions of dollars, not nickles and dimes, and therefore, again, if it is established, by law, already, to set the power of law enforcement to the task of punishing people who fail to pay back debts, then why not work at the top 10, America's Most Wanted, instead of the petty criminals who are found guilty of failing to pay back insignificant debts; no longer assumed to be innocent until proven guilty?
See how some questions will not be answered by people who actually do not understand the scope of the problems that they expend their power, their lives, to solve?
What explains the often repeated mistake of purporting to employ the cause of the problem as a means by which the problem will be solved?
You have to get past the false front to get to the accurate answer.
There are no short cuts.
So, supposing that it is a good idea to punish guilty debtors, failing to repay debts, and then supposing that one of The FED people, the one found most guilty of failing to pay back the most money ever borrowed, the number one guy, or gal, on America's Most Wanted Top 10 list, and that guilty person does find his, or her, behind in jail.
How is that working for us at that point, compared to a million much lesser criminals begin arrested, and punished, and imprisoned, for failing to pay back much less than the one worst criminal?
The one worst criminal is then accurately known to have borrowed trillions, failed to pay back one cent, and the next one after that one is also in prison, and the top 10, also confessed, or also found guilty, and also in prison, and new criminals take over their jobs at the top of the food chain at The FED, and at that time the honest productive people in America are paying for 10 criminals doing time in lush prisons, or not so lush prisons, depending upon where those 10 actually do their time, while the new FED employes continue to borrow trillions, and fail to pay back one dime, so the productive people in America still pay that bill too as the borrowed money is spent on Booming the Chinese Economy, or the propping up the European Economy, or running aggressive wars for profit, or whatever other secret, undisclosed, expense that borrowed money buys.
How does that work? How much does it cost to keep 10 of the worst criminals in a prison, failing to pay debts, compared to how much it costs to keep a million lesser criminals in prison?
What do the 10 worst criminals learn in their lush prisons, with satellite T.V., and conjugal visits with captive under age sex slaves, compared to what the millions of lesser criminals learn in their prisons where they will be tortured, gang raped, sodomized, and where their punishments may never end?
What is the cost of falsehood, and who pays that cost?
Is it past time to know better?