 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
The Libertarian Party web page candidate submission form generated an e-mail from a Libertarian Party member, which led to an e-mail from me, which led to a phone call from a Libertarian Party member, which was not immediately picked up by me, which led to a message I read, which led to a phone call from me, which was not picked up, which led to a message entered by me, which led to nothing more as yet.
When I ran as a Libertarian candidate for the California 40th District House of Representatives I ended up getting on the Ballot, with a list of names provided by someone in the Libertarian Party, and those names were members of The Libertarian Party in my district, and those people signed my money saving petition, when I knocked on their doors.
There is a method by which The Libertarian Party picks candidates, and that method is obviously not a web based method, since my web based experience proves that candidates are not recognized to be candidates by that method. There was no mention whatsoever in the e-mail or the phone message as to candidacy of any kind from The Libertarian Party.
There is a concept called push, and there is a concept called pull. An example of the pull concept could be illustrated by such things as any competitive Racing Association. Take NASCAR racing for example, and consider the process by which the best drivers move from where they were young on into the race cars on race day.
Competition pulls the best in from all possible sources so as to move the best up to the front of the pack, where the best race against the best, and the winner is the only one that wins, because the winner is the best.
Talent shows on T.V. work to illustrate the concept.
Push is the concept that the driver does, or the singer, or the dancer, so as to push past each difficulty on the path, and the team backing the individual pushes the individual to maintain the highest competitive edge over the competition.
What pulls liars, torturers, and mass murderers to be drawn into the thing that is called government, the thing I call legal crime?
The obvious answer is power, and it is destructive power, it is criminal power. A liar, torturer, and mass murderer can't get away with lies, torture, and mass murder without a powerful cover.
It is not a surprise to find that the process by which candidates are moved from all corners of the country to those lying, torturing, and mass murdering cover posts, is criminal in nature, where the best liar, the best torturer, and the best mass murderer wins.
That makes sense, that is how that works, but what does not make sense is the vacuum.
The concept of push and pull can also be illustrated by the concept of supply and demand. When there is a demand for lies, torture, and murder, there are those who will fill that demand, and since there is an abundant supply of lies, torture, and mass murder, there is therefore an obvious demand for lies, torture, and murder, and the demand is obviously being filled by those professionals who are best at filling that demand.
What about the demand for accurate information, productive power, and adaptive invention?
Has the power of falsehood grown so massive as to cover up the demand for anything else, on the surface, and therefore has the demand for accurate information, productive power, and adaptive invention gone underground, as far as the political economy sphere is concerned?
Where is there, if one exists, a working competition, pulling, and demanding, that candidates who are providing the most accurate information, leading to higher quality and lower cost productive power increases, and the most adaptive inventions to overcome the most difficult problems facing mankind, and where are the people pushing those qualities from all corners of the country into the race that determines the best of the best so as to move the best into that job?
What explains the vacuum?
Is it under the cover of darkness?