 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Anyone,
A television reporter asked Ron Paul a question:
What tools exist to reign it in.
The subject matter is The Fed.
Look here:
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article27988.htm
Are you smarter than a 5th Grader?
I want to speak to the Honest Productive People of America, the people who are intelligent as a result of necessity, and as a result of a willful demand for the truth, over time.
Above are 3 viewpoints, and I will ad a fourth:
1. The Fed (the official legal viewpoint from "private" interests)
2. Journalism (the official no-nonsense "uncover and report the truth and let the chips fall as they may" viewpoint)
3. Government (the official legal viewpoint from the "public" interests)
4. My viewpoint (a viewpoint based upon over 3 decades of diligent, and relentless, independent study, complete with links to sources)
My viewpoint:
A sound bite will not work. Here is my source for the claim that a sound bite will not work:
http://rescomp.stanford.edu/~cheshire/EinsteinQuotes.html
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler."
I.
Human survival is a power struggle (as simple as it gets)
I.A
Human survival depends upon the power each individual produces in excess of consumption; failure to produce more than consumed is unsustainable for each individual member of the human species, and unsustainable as a total measure of all power produced by all humans as consumption subtracts from that total.
I.B
Human survival depends upon reproduction, failure of one person to reproduce is an example of one individual consuming the power of one individual life and failing to produce more life during the consumption of that one life, and failure, therefore, to reproduce that one individual (genetic) example of life, while failure to reproduce, as a total amalgamation of all individual human lives, is failure to perpetuate the species; human life ends. The power of reproduction is insufficient, human life lasts one more generation.
I.C
1. Human beings can take power from other human beings, as a method of surviving, which is a method by which total power decreases. This method can be seen as the parasitic method, and it is a method that cannot be sustained, it is a method that does not ensure the survival of the species, it is a method that ensures that the species will destroy itself, and it is a method that will destroy itself if the power of the numbers of individuals using this method reach a critical mass of numbers, and the result is a steady rate of consumption, of power, that is greater than the rate of power produced. The parasites consume the host by this unsustainable method when the numbers of people operating this method exceed the number of people who produce power, not as a strict, simple, relative number of people: as an accurately measurable power struggle.
I.C
2. Human beings can refuse to take power from other human beings, as a method of surviving (producing by way of producing, more than consumed - not the parasitic method), a method by which total power increases. This method can be seen as the host method, and it is a method that sustains human life. Power available is used to make more power, and the level of power increases exponentially, since the scarce power supply increases to an abundant power supply, which increases the power available, the power from which more power is produced increases, and therefore the rate of increase increases. The result of an increase in the power supply is an increase in the standard of living, for each individual human being, while the cost of living decreases, for each human being, as power moves from scarcity to abundance - while power is used to produce more power, and then more power is used to produce even more power, on and on, even reaching a total power supply that can build Pyramids, or produce inter-planetary travel, even to a potential point of total power that is sufficient to empower the human species with the power to colonize other planets.
II.
Numerous methods exist by which people either take power from other people or people produce power (use power to make more power), resulting in either scarce power, and destruction, or abundant power and production.
II.
A.
The methods by which people take power from other people, all of the methods, can be called crime, in English, or some other word in another language, it is the same process in any language.
The criminal methods include (but not limited to):
1. Deceit (the power of knowledge is skillfully employed in the process of transferring power from the ignorant victim to the knowledgeable criminal)
2. Threats of violence (the power of will is skillfully employed in the process of transferring power from the apathetic victim to the willful criminal)
3. Examples of violence (the power of force is skillfully employed in the process of transferring power from the weak victims to the strong criminal)
4. Organized crime (criminals agree to access division of labor, specialization, and economies of scale, in the work of taking power from other criminals, not in their group, and taking power from power producers, and recruiting more members into the one dominant, criminal, group)
Note: Power producers are the source of power, therefore crime cannot exist without that group, a function of numbers applies, and becomes obvious, as the number of criminals increase, the number of power producers decrease, and the total supply of power produced decreases as that power supply is divided by the number of people consuming it, and not adding to it, that power supply is produced by a steady decline in numbers of producers, and that power is consumed by a steady increase in the number of criminals, and the rate of consumption increases in proportion to the increase in criminals gaining numbers over the number of power producers. The rate of power consumption increases while the rate of power production decreases as the criminal power gains power over the productive power.
Where:
C = the number of criminals, parasites, or those who take power from other people
P = the number of power producers, or those who produce more power than they consume
T = the total supply of power above consumption
+ = a rate of increase in the total supply of power
- = a rate of decrease in the total supply of power
C > P = T-
C < P = T+
The greater or less than symbol can be "power in numbers" or just power not necessarily a function of numbers of individual criminals or individual power producers.
Criminals produce crime, destruction, or negative surplus wealth.
Producers produce surplus wealth, they consume less than they produce, they produce positive surplus wealth, and if no one does so, human life ends.
As the total number of criminals (parasites) increase, the rate of increase in the total power supply decreases, and when the total number of criminals exceed the total number of power producers, the result is a negative rate of total power supply increase, or, the people, as a total amalgamated whole, consume their power supply, which is unsustainable, as power lessens, power becomes scarce, then more scarce, and fewer and fewer people have enough power to survive, fewer and fewer people add to the total power supply.
As the total number of criminals (parasites) decrease, the rate of increase in the total power supply increases, and when the total number of power producers exceed the total number of criminals, the result is a positive rate of total power supply increase, or, the people, as a total amalgamated whole, produce more power than the power consumed, and as more power becomes available, more power is used to make more power, and the quality of life increase, and the cost of life decreases, and the power producers work less and get more for each measure of power spent.
For each measure of power spent, more power is produced, when the power of the producers exceed the power of the criminal parasites.
Visual reference:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbkSRLYSojo&feature=player_embedded
The above visual reference measures an increase in the total power supply and therefore the total power spent by the parasitic criminal group must be less than the total power supply produced (minus the total power spent by the productive group) because the total power supply has increased, as the power producers improve the rate of power production for each amount of power spent, working less and gaining more over time, when seen as an amalgamated whole, and the rate of increase increases despite the parasitic crime power consuming power, and not adding to power, at a high rate.
That is the good news.
The power producers are gaining power over the parasitic criminals in measurable ways overall.
The bad news is such that some individuals are being consumed so as to benefit other individuals in some places, at some times, in the past, and in some places right now, and in some places some time in the future.
The worse news is that some of the individuals who are being consumed, to the unwelcome benefit of criminal individuals, are the most productive people, the people who could have, but will not, increase the total power supply, and the worse news grows exponentially worse, as the power stolen from the productive people, who are now less able to produce, empowers the parasitic people making their criminal group more powerful, and therefore more able to consume, and lessen, the total power supply.
Historical reference:
http://www.constitution.org/civ/comsense.htm
Society in every state is a blessing, but government even in its best state is but a necessary evil in its worst state an intolerable one; for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries by a government, which we might expect in a country without government, our calamities is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer!
Honest productive people who send their hard earned power to people so as to protect the hard working people from harm, is one thing. Honest productive people who send their hard earned power to people so as to protect the hard working people from harm, but instead the power sent is used to injure honest productive people is another thing.
One thing increases the power supply, and the other thing decreases the power supply, on purpose, for someone's, or some groups, exclusive profit.
All that above is meant to offer a competitive viewpoint intended to describe the nature and constitution of the problem. The problem is such that those who produce power are being victimized as the power they produce is stolen and then the stolen power is used to perpetuate the power to steal, under the false front of "protection" against harm.
Having the fourth competitive viewpoint in view I am going to comment on the other 3 viewpoints originally posted above.
1. The Fed (the official legal viewpoint from "private" interests)
2. Journalism (the official no-nonsense find the truth and let the chips fall as they may viewpoint)
3. Government (the official legal viewpoint from the "public" interests)
4. My viewpoint (a viewpoint based upon over 3 decades of diligent, and relentless, independent study, complete with links to sources)
1. The FED
I can offer a real time account of how The Fed works, and then make some comments in the effort to communicate why the real time account does account for how The Fed works.
http://www.usdebtclock.org/
That web site measures the flow of dollars. The Fed controls the flow of dollars. If the honest productive people actually want to keep the power they earn, so that they can use that power to create even more power, and so that they can avoid providing the means by which they suffer, then all the honest productive people have to do is to replace the dollar with something better, and that won't be difficult to do, since the dollar is almost as bad as the worst that can be, in that sphere of conflicting interests that goes by many names, including:
1. The Fed
2. The Dollar Hegemony
3. Wall Street
4. The World Reserve Currency
5. The Business Cycle
6. The Globalists
7. The Elite
8. The New World Order
9. Business a usual
10. The Establishment
11. The Powers that be
12. The Oligarchy
13, U.S.A. Inc. (LLC)
The name is a place holder, the thing, is what the thing is, in reality. Deception is the greatest power employed by those who profit from that thing, and those who profit from that thing can make their victims believe that everyone profits from that thing, as we all join together in our power struggle to profit at the expense of other people, or non-people, or weak people, or unfortunate people, or stupid people, or terrorists, or savages, or socialists, or capitalists, or the bogey men.
In a word, the Fed, is criminal, or false, or destructive. One word descriptions, although accurate, only begin to explain the complexity. Simplicity works, but not if the idea is to produce an effective remedy. Simplicity works to accurately identify the problem.
If the honest productive people are able to slow down, stop, and end the flow of their hard earned power going to the people who use that stolen power to keep the flow going in that direction, the dollar has to either go, or the dollar has to become something that it is not, because the dollar is the unit of currency that does what it does, in real time.
This:
http://www.usdebtclock.org/
The dollar in its present form, as it is designed, and used, is a destructive tool, a deceptive tool, a weapon, and it perpetuates a crime in progress.
That web site, that debt clock, measures what The Fed does. You can believe whatever you want, while you stay connected to everyone who is connected by the dollar, and those who are not connected by the dollar aren't, no matter what anyone wants to believe. If you are connected you pay along that path, if you are not connected you don't pay along that path. Disconnect from the dollar, see what happens. If disconnection from the dollar disconnects you from every other power producers, you will suffer a net loss of power, a bad idea lone. So you stay connected to the criminals, so as to stay connected to the other power producers. Only disconnecting from the dollar connection, without replacing the connection to other power producers, by way of a better connection, results in, cutting off your nose to spite your face, or shooting yourself in the foot, so, logically, the right thing to do is to connection to other power producers with a different form of currency. Failing to fill the void, when the connection between power producers and criminals is no longer a connection, is economic exile, solitary confinement, or some other word that is a place holder for the real time result of having no connection to anyone else. The Fed disconnects power producers from other power producers when they create an economic bust, when they bleed the economic body into an anemic, bloodless, condition. The solution isn't to help the criminals by volunteering to produce less, and consume more, to give more blood, attach more parasites, invite over a few more vampires, or completely disconnect yourself from every other power producer, the solution is to throw the bath water out, and keep the baby. The honest, and accurate, accounting mediums, that connect power producers to power producers, is vital, in the process of using scarce power to make more power, and make power abundant, without which, human life ends. It is a suicidal act to willfully sever the connections between power producers, as the saying goes, if products don't cross boarders, troops will, and that is true for a reason, a reason that should be clear, but may not be clear, when the power of reason is compromised by the power of falsehood. A proposed solution that suggests disconnection from all, is a solution that proposes disconnection of power producers to power producers, when, if you think about it, all that is needed is disconnection of power producers from criminals. One supposed solution removes any hope of charity, for many reasons, and the other workable solution preserves that willful connection between power producers and people in desperate need of help, such as children, and old people, and people who are too weak minded, or too weak physically to produce, alone, enough power to survive.
Cut the connections between everyone, as a supposed solution to cut out the connection to criminals, isn't a solution, it is another problem, and a very serious one.
The dollar connects all who use it to all who use it. Those who are not connected by the dollar are either completely disconnected from everyone else, or some other connection connects people to people. Connecting criminals to their victims is what the dollar does, that is what it is designed to do, and the flow of power goes one way in that connection, it goes from those who produce power to those who steal it, and the stolen power is then used to perpetuate that form of that connection so as to keep the power flowing only in that direction.
The dollar, in that form, has to go, but not without something better filling the void, something competitive, something that allows the consumer to regain the power to choose something better, and no longer something that is the only thing that must be used, when it is made available, or not used, when it is made scarce, according to one person, or one group of a very few individuals.
That is what The Fed does and the score board (debt clock) is as accurate as it needs to be, and there are many forms of the score board including the following reference. In addition to the dollar denominated Nation State (nationalism) Debt Clock there are these scores along the dollar denominated legal monopoly extortion racket money trail:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7-gCKDmnRGY
Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports report, precisely, who produces power, where the power comes from, and who steals power, names, dates, amounts, and all of it is denominated in dollars, and all of it stops the second that anyone connected to that crime in progress stops using dollars, and starts using something better.
Failing to use something better than dollars, or failing to make dollars something that no longer is used to steal power, is not a solution, just like laborers going on strike is not a solution. Laborers uniting to create a better business competitor, and then out-competing their former employer is a solution; because one method stops the process of producing power, going the wrong way, and the other method forces competition which forces more production of higher quality, at lower costs, gaining more power, as a solution, rather than consuming power as a supposed solution, rather than refusing to be productive, as a supposed solution.
A. Measurable progress that accurately proves that the problem is being solved.
B. Lies that cover-up the truth; whereby the supposed solution is the problem.
All those words intend to quantify and qualify what The Fed is.
How do you measure what The Fed is, in reality, and without resorting to deceit as a means of communicating what is The Fed?
2. Journalism (the official no-nonsense find the truth and let the chips fall as they may viewpoint)
If the supposed journalist fails to accurately communicate how criminals are now perpetrating very serious crimes, what then constitutes that message? That message, if it fails to accurately communicate how criminals are now perpetrating serious, very serious, crimes, is by that measure criminal. The crime may be nothing more than a failure to know the truth, criminal negligence, and a little bit of criminal negligence is not worth a moments concern, not a fraction of a second of concern does any good, whatsoever, concerning a minute, minuscule, harm-less, crime of criminal negligence, on the far end of that scale, and on the far other end of that scale, criminal negligence can include such things as a doctor prescribing Tylenol to a patient who will die from something obvious, something any other doctor would not miss-diagnose, just to illustrate the point of criminal negligence, which is a scale of examples from least to most criminally negligent.
If you were a reporter and you were watching a group of people driving tanks with flame throwers through a church full of people, including pregnant mothers, babies, women, children, old people, toddlers, and even grown men, and you reported that the burning, crushed, and tortured dying people were "killing themselves", and if that is what you actual believe, as you report that criminal massacre, then you are defining what is criminal negligence, as you fail to be a journalist. It matters not if there are laws that intend to discourage such crimes, they are crimes by the measure of their ability to cover-up, and perpetuate, crime.
If the supposed Journalist intentionally produces and publishes false information, concerning very serious crimes, committed by known criminals, then the supposed Journalist is an accessory to those very serious crimes, a hired criminal associate, or even a charitable volunteer criminal associate, covering up the crimes, "pro-bono".
Alex Jones is a Journalist, by the measure of communicating the facts, facts that can be proven, or challenged. If a journalists facts are successfully challenged, a journalist further proves his measure of journalism by retracting the false information. These are known methods of accomplishing knowable goals.
3. Government (the official legal viewpoint from the "public" interests)
Ron Paul is a representative of liberty, as far his power allows him to be, which, by that definition, as he defines that definition, represents everyone, and excludes no one, except by way of self-exclusion when criminals exclude themselves from that group. Got that? Why, you may ask, does this guy, Joe Kelley, speak in language that is so foreign to my ears? If you think that, then you are measuring the language of duplicity, you are measuring the language of falsehood relative to the words I convey to you. By contrast the language of falsehood is compared to the words you read from me. I don't speak double speak, get it?
Ron Paul, as far as I have known his messages, and that goes back decades, consistently represents everyone, except the criminals who exempt themselves from liberty, because Ron Paul represents liberty. Liberty is the condition of life that effectively disconnects criminals from victims, liberates the victims from their oppressors. When criminals can't get to their targeted victims, there are no victims, all the potential victims are liberated, and no longer accessible to the criminals. If that appears to you to be a message written in a foreign language, then you may be speaking double speak. I don't.
You may have grown accustomed to speaking with a forked tongue. You may have been exposed too long to the radiation of falsehoods emitted by the supposed journalists who are in fact members of the legal crime cabal, just get yourself a Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, and follow the dollars as those dollars connect the victims with the criminals, if you want to know who those criminals are, there they are, in black and white. Numbers don't lie. Math is provable. Math repeats each time you try it, the same result occurs every time you use math to solve a problem. How much do you get when you take 1 from 2 this time? How much do you get when you take 1 from 2 tomorrow? When you come up with a different answer, using math, let me know, so far, math works the same it once did 2000 years ago. The English language isn't that way, not like math. What was once a liberal 200 years ago, is not a liberal today. Why?
Try math, it works better. Try reading what I write, not what you assume to be what I write, and you may see the math based message, or not, and then try asking questions, if you are the least bit curious.
4. My viewpoint (a viewpoint based upon over 3 decades of diligent, and relentless, independent study, complete with links to sources)
There are too many divergent viewpoints working to solve one problem, when one solution works to solve one problem. What is the problem?
Power is being consumed by those who steal it from those who create it, and that stolen power is used to perpetuate that one way flow of power.
That is English.
The math based account of the problem is documented in dollars.
That is math.
If that one problem, dollars, is known, what is the solution?
Again from Alex Jones's own power to report the facts:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LDswHOfib9A
That is a source of information that reports a clearly workable solution to the problem.
The problem:
Power is being consumed by those who steal it from those who create it and that stolen power is used to perpetuate that one way flow of power.
The solution must be a method by which power is no longer flowing to those who steal power, as the thieves then use power to keep stealing power, and the solution must also allow the productive people to connect with fellow power producers maintaining the power to use power in the work of increasing power, which increases quality, and lowers cost, or increases the standard of living for all the power producers, and as a bonus, charity is possible.
What is the best solution?
What is the second best solution?
What is the third best solution?
Who decides which solution is the best one?
Will the best solution be the best solution for everyone, at the expense of no one, except those people who willfully volunteer to exclude themselves from the benefits of the best solution?
At this point I see a need to return to Gary North and his report on the division within the Austrian Economist group:
http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north512.html
WHAT IS THE SOLUTION?
In theory, there are two possible solutions, neither of which has any possibility of being implemented in my lifetime or yours.
One solution is free banking. This was Ludwig von Mises' suggestion. There would be no bank regulation, no central bank monopolies, no bank licensing, and no legal barriers to entry. Let the most efficient banks win! In other words, the solution is a free market in money.
Another solution is 100% reserve banking. Banks would not be allowed to issue more receipts for gold or silver than they have on deposit. Anything else is fraud. There would be regulation and supervision to make sure deposits matched loans. This was Murray Rothbard's solution. The question is: Regulation by whom? With what authority?
There would be no government-issued money. There would be no government mint. There would be no legal tender laws. There would be no barriers to entry into coin production.
There would also be no free services. There is no such thing as a free lunch.
Anything other than free banking or 100% reserve banking is a pseudo-gold standard or silver standard. It is just one more invitation to confiscation.
Four solutions:
1. The Fed system of extortion using the dollar unit of currency to connect the power producers to the legal criminals: transferring power one way (an enforced legal monopoly)
2. A solution by which government produces and maintains a not-for-profit monetary accounting system such as the examples shown in the Money Masters videos, or the proposed examples reported by Walter Burien, or examples offered by one side of the Austrian Economist group (all of which are enforced legal money monopolies)
3. No law power expended toward the enforcement of any money supply of any kind, no power taken by government and then spent to subsidize any competitive money supplier whatsoever, which is the other side of the Austrian Economist group (the complete absence of the willful employment of the force of government in the work that causes a money monopoly power)
4. My competitive offering of 2 financial products issued by the government power as licenses awarded to a number of competitive money producing businesses in the effort to solve both the problem of having a need for competition in money markets, so as to allow the force of competition to enforce higher quality, and lower cost, and the problem of financing government by some means other than abject crime (involuntary taxation).
Clearly, for anyone having managed to get this far, the fact that competition is the solution, and competition is the force that will work to solve the problem, can be seen as a glaringly obvious fact.
Having no choice other than The Fed system of extortion, measurable by following the flow of dollars, using math, using the actual record of dollars flowing from the source of dollars, through each user, and back to the source of dollars, having no choice but that measurable crime spree, that perpetual victimization of the people who produce power, by the people who steal it, is the only single enforced answer for the few who profit by that one choice, which is not a choice at all, since it is a crime, and it is a devious crime, and it is enforced by threats of violence, and it is enforced by actual examples of violence. It is not a choice, it is a dictate, it is an enforced condition of servitude whereby anyone using dollars will be sending the power they create to the criminals who produce and maintain the dollar legal unit of money.
Anyone choosing something better solves that problem - as obvious as the sun on a clear summer day in the open desert.
Something better that that extortion racket is, in a word, competition.
A. Monopoly
B. Competition
One is not a choice, and the other is a choice. That, at least, is obvious.
Among the competitors, which ones are no better, and potentially worse than the dollar monopoly non-choice, and how can anyone move from the dollar non-choice to a better choice, when taxes must be paid, and the only legal money accepted by the involuntary tax enforcers are dollars?
Of the four choices I have enumerated above, there is only one choice that completely avoids monopoly, and that choice, as it happens, completely removes the force of involuntary taxation. You can't have one with out the other. A laws that says, hey dude, if you want, you can pay me with your choice of money, when you pay your taxes, is a law that removes the tax collectors from the power they have over money, and once that power is gone, the government power is subject to the money power. Once that law is the law the money power subjects the government power to whatever the money power demands, or else, the government power does not collect taxes, or money, or power, and that is why the word power is a better word than money.
Money is power. Power is money. If money has no power (to purchase) it isn't money. Get that, or remain ignorant about money.
I like that choice. You may not. Many people, even most people, think (or are made to believe) that taxes must be involuntary, since failing to enforce tax payments, from the people who create wealth, which is the only place taxes can come from, will result in anarchy, and anarchy, according to this type of thinking, is a situation whereby everyone is running around raping, robbing, torturing, and mass murdering everyone else, as the story goes, all men are bad, and therefore some of "us", have to lord over the rest of us, and "us" good people have to force all the bad people, and "us" good people must make the bad people good, by our superior goodness, since "they" are all bad, and only "we", or "i", am good, in other words, might makes right, or in other words "do unto others before they have a chance to do unto you", or, kill or be killed.
That is the script that is written by all the dictators, and unfortunately, that is the script that is also read by all the dupes who are sending their hard earned power to the dictators. Here, take this power I worked hard to produce, and kill them over there, before "we" have to kill them over here, or bla, bla, bla, bla, the same story, in other words. You are either with us, or you are a terrorist.
In one word:
Obey
There is no choice, and that is the secret.
Knowing that that is what is happening, measurably happening, is one thing, doing something about it is another thing.
Of the options enumerated above, to solve the problem described above, are the monopoly money enforcement methods. The Fed solution solves the "How can I get something for nothing?" problem, which is the problem from the victims perspective, and which is the solution from the criminals perspective. The Bill Still, Money Masters, or the Walter Burien, from his work with Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports, solutions, employ government in the work of supplying a not-for-private-profit legal money monopoly method, which has worked, does work, and will work, so long as the criminals don't take it over, as they are likely to do, have done, and are doing.
The same problems, of usurpation, are addressed in the solution I offer, if anyone wants to know.
The main point here, from my viewpoint, is to point out that the solution is to allow the force of competition to work, as competition is a measurable transfer of power from a monopoly power, whereby the consumers have no choice, to a condition whereby the consumers have the power of choice, and once the consumers have the power of choice, the suppliers must increase quality, and lower cost, or the other suppliers will increase quality, and lower cost, and therefore the only way to keep the power that is needed to stay in business, is to pony up, and be better than the competition.
If the solution is to change the laws so that government is subject to the monopoly power and the monopoly power has no competition, then that is a description of what is, not a description of the solution. That is a description of the problem, not a description of the solution.
Therefore there are two obvious methods to solve the problem (as it was described above):
1. Enforce a single supplier by way of deceit, threats of violence, and acts of violence, by the single supplier (criminals) upon the targeted consumers (victims).
2. Allow liberty to work, whereby victims have effectively disconnected their connections to the criminals, and suppliers must produce higher quality supplies to the consumers or be forced to look for work where they can supply higher quality supplies to the consumers, or be dependent upon true charity for failing to produce more than they consume, or die trying.
My viewpoint may appear to be harsh to some. Think first. Use your own brain. If the power supply becomes scarce then there isn't enough power to be charitable, and on that path each person will be forced to spend more and more of the scarce supply of power working to defend against a growing number of increasingly desperate criminals.
If liberty exists, as a greater and greater power, as more and more producers of wealth disconnect themselves from the criminals, more and more power is produced, and less and less power is consumed in the work of defending against criminals, because, by that definition, more and more people are allowed to produce more power, and less and less people can afford to earn their living at crime as the remaining criminals have to fight each other to gain access to the remaining, shrinking, supply of ready victims.
Added to one problem is one more problem and before I add the second problem I will restate the first one:
The problem:
Power is being consumed by those who steal it from those who create it and that stolen power is used to perpetuate that one way flow of power.
Second problem:
Too many people continue to believe that they can solve a measurable problem by using a solution that is measurably the same exact thing as the problem.
In one word the problem is:
Stupification
That is a numbers problem. How can less people be in one group and how can more people be in the other group?
Group A: Those who stupify
Group B: Those who are stupified
If Darwin's theory is correct, then that problem will solve itself, one way or the other. The internet, for example, may have been constructed as a means by which those who stupify can increase their power to stupify, and now, it seems, the power is like a genie let out of the bottle, or like the opening of Pandora's box, and try as they might, the genie won't go back in the bottle, and the box remains open.
Stop reading from the script, before it is too late, please.