 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
JAY: Okay. Number 21: Big government makes people more open to change. How's that? We're told big government destroys innovation.
That exposes, more so than almost anything, the true destructive power of legal crime. If the law is criminal, or involuntary, then the law is a method by which power flows from those who create power to those who steal it, that is a physically measurable fact, and one way, but perhaps not the best way, perhaps not the highest quality way, and not the lowest cost way, to physically measure the flow of power from those who create it to those who steal it, causing Big (criminal) Government to get Bigger, and Bigger, and Bigger, is this:
How Big can it get, physically?
So number 21 on the list of things that "they" don't tell you is, again, more importantly the same lie, where the criminals (they) don't tell you that government is organized crime, and failing to know that makes all the rest of this stuff a very poor investment of power (time and energy).
Crime destroys, that is what crime does, that is the purpose of it, and when it is organized crime, it becomes very innovative, actually the people running it become very innovative, at the work of stealing all the power, all the power that can be stolen, and then using that stolen power in the work that must be done to keep the organized crime business "flourishing", which is certainly not good for the victims, who are no longer able to use their power in the work of "flourishing", since all their power is not only stolen, but all their power is being used to steal more.
What exactly, and without smoke and mirrors, and without lies, and without threats of violence, and without examples of violence, is government?
If that question above is left unanswered, or ambiguous, then it is ignorant to suggest that a qualitative or quantitative question concerning government can be answered intelligently.
So what is the point in dodging the obvious error, and moving onto ignorant questions that lack intelligence?
The obvious answers, just to begin listing possible competitive answers, seeking the highest quality answer, at the lowest cost, are:
1. Willful deceit
2. Ignorance
3. Willful ignorance (stupidity)
4. Misplaced and misguided applications of productive power, whereby the power spent is misspent and the goal of knowing becomes less possible.
5. Other obvious answers
I do not have enough information to know the truest answer. I will guess that the answer is 4 above, and that these guys are struggling to understand things, but missing the Elephant in the room, as the Elephant eats up all the resources, space, food, air, etc., and the Elephant excretes piles upon piles of putrid poisonous waste which further encroaches upon scarce resources, and that Elephant is, in every single example whereby a supposed agent of government willfully employs the power of government in the perpetration of injury to innocent victims, which includes any involuntary tax whatsoever, criminal.
Is government synonymous with crime, and if so, why speak of it as if it is anything but crime? If there is a non-criminal government, where is it, what distinguishes the non-criminal government from crime, exactly?
One lone gunman, lone assassin, single individual criminal, is one thing, but to have almost every elected and almost every unelected, government agent stupefied into willfully enforcing a false belief in the legitimacy, and the moral correctness, of stealing, this involuntary tax confidence scheme, is all together different, whereby the force that could be use to avoid crime is almost entirely turned into the force that ensures that crime will grow, and grow, and grow, until everyone becomes a criminal and a victim, and all power is consumed in the work of perpetuating crime.
Read Alexandr I. Solzhenitsyn, wise up, before it is too late.
Wake up now, or tomorrow morning, sooner rather than later, and refuse to participate in crime, no more lies, no more plans to injure innocent victims, and no more executions of those plans to injure innocent victims, including the enforcements of involuntary tax payments. At some point each member of that involuntary association will run out of power and expire, because that is how involuntary associations work, as each member of an involuntary association is hell bent on consuming a steadily declining power source, to consume before someone else will, until all power is gone, leaving the last, most innovative, and most powerful, legal criminal, left, or, moving in the opposite direction, the honest productive people figure out how to avoid the criminals and set about using the power they have to make more power.
A. Chose the criminal method
B. Reject the criminal method
I'll listen to more of the Real News report, as those people obviously fail in fundamental accounting. Do they really think that the legal criminals are trying to do the right thing but failing, each time, over, and over, and over again?
Real News:
CHANG: That's right, yeah, exactly, yeah. In the United States especially, people believe that big government made people lazy because they give free handouts to these people who don't want to work. But, you know, this is one of the biggest kind of misconceptions that we have, you know, this notion that you need to make people really afraid for them to do things, work hard, think creatively. No. I mean, this actually is counterproductive.
There is no doubt, not in my experience, that many people are stupified into accepting falsehood, and then defending it, often vehemently, but who is doing so now? "They" don't know any better. "They" think government is bad.
Which government?
"They" think that socialist government is bad?
Which socialist government?
"They" don't understand that socialism is good.
Which socialism?
Is it, or is it not, a good idea to plan on, and then execute the plan, that results in the transfer of power, by deceit, by threats of violence, and by executions of violence, from those who create power, to those who receive that power by those methods?
If the answer is yes, that is a good idea, then the person answering that question is "they", the mysterious "they", the stupfied "they", the criminal "they", the ones who support, and perpetuate, the flow of power from those who create it, to those who steal it, by way of deceit, by way of threats of violence, and by way of executions of very destructive violent acts.
Why ignore the Elephant in the room? Who benefits? Who gains, by that willful ignorance. "They" can't see the crime factor? Really? Is that Real News or something less real?
Sure the criminal socialist democrats tell lies, in the effort to get their victims to accept those lies, and render their victims powerless to avoid victimization. I read that loud and clear as the criminal capitalist republicans report such truths.
Sure the criminal capitalist republicans tell lies, in the effort to get their victims to accept those lies, and render their victims powerless to avoid victimization. I read that loud and clear too.
When are the non-criminal honest productive people going to recognize a common bond? Never?
Never may be a much shorter span of time than we may be led to believe, if never is the answer to the question of when the non-criminal honest productive people will recognize a common bond. If the answer is soon, or now, what form will that common, agreeable, common bond take, what will constitute that bond, how can that bond be qualified and quantified, and how can that form of that common bond be improved in quality and how can that form of that common bond be reduced in cost?
It can't, ever, because it never will be recognized by anyone? The opposite of the Elephant in the room, that many people willfully ignore, is the common bond that empowers honest productive people with the power needed to move away from legal crime and toward higher quality life, at a lower cost, for all, even the criminals.
Back to the Real News for me.
CHANG: Yeah. So these people, they are not only provided the basic health care, education, and minimum income support; they also are provided with this retraining skills, which means that you lose your job. Okay, I mean, no one likes to lose their job, but, I mean, even if you lose the job, it's not the end of the world, because you have the minimum living standard. You will get retrained and probably find another job, whereas in America you don't want to lose your current job ever, because it means no health care, no retraining.
That dogma belongs in the falsehood pile that it is within, it belong in the falsehood that it is of, within the involuntary association connection, the common bond between people, in that involuntary association network, which is crime, that is what that is, and that is what belongs in any accurate appraisal of what happens within such a network, such a social structure. If the form of the connection is involuntary, the output will be determined by the powers that gain power by that form of connection, and it will be a one way street, power will flow from those who create power, and power will flow to those who steal it.
Look at the measure of that type of connection, that type of bond, and see what happens when a criminal, involuntary, form of connection is enforced, or tolerated into being the form of connection that is the dominant form.
The Debt Clock shows what happens in real time. Power flow from the only place power comes from, which, obviously, intelligently, logically, and reasonably, comes from the people who do manage to produce power (despite having much of the power produced stolen), and that power flows to those who steal it.
How is that not obvious?
What is the point of ignoring that very significant factor?
The form of the involuntary connection includes such things as the form of money that is produced, but not the only thing, and that form of money thereby measures the factual transfer of power from those who create it to those who steal power.
Once the criminals have the power that is stolen, do you really think that they will spend that power in any way that may reduce their power to keep stealing?
Where are the smart people who once populated this planet?
Sure, there is a need to invest some of the power stolen in the work of making sure that there continues to be some power produced, failing in that work would result in no more power to steal, everyone at that point, again, is either a criminal or a victim, or by act of God, or willful application of intelligence, the honest productive people figure out how to separate from the criminals, and begin using power to make more power, without an official order to do so, handed down by way of dictate, from a criminal with a badge, or a license to steal, torture, and mass murder, and, lets not forget, the legal criminals have even given themselves the license to threaten the survival of the human species.
The Elephant in the room has grown very, very, large, and some people are waist deep in the bowels of it.
How about a visual:
Searching for an Honest Politician