 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
"Anti-Small Business"
My comments intend to address the overall, comprehensive, principle and interest, to all honest productive people who do, willfully, knowingly, and consistently produce more wealth than the wealth they consume, the same group of people who earn the credit they deserve for moving civilization from abject misery to higher, and higher, quality of life, and lower, and lower costs associated with living.
How about pretending with me, along the lines of having all these honest productive people suddenly waking up, this morning, and seeking methods by which their power to progress toward higher quality life, at lower costs, increases, instead of having their power siphoned off by legal crime, at greater and greater, and greater volumes of power flowing, and flowing, and flowing from them to those legal criminals.
Suppose this group of people move their focus of defensive effort, all at once, like a laser beam, toward one expedient, effective, and economical expense, and then they get back to work doing what they do best, which is to produce more wealth and consume less wealth, so that the total supply of wealth increases by their capacity to do so, and the amount of power consumed in defense is spent wisely this time, instead of having the power invested toward defense used to perpetrate the crime of stealing that power.
A. Productive people think that their earnings are being used to secure their power to earn from theft, but instead of consuming their defensive power in the work of defense their power flows to criminals who then use that power in the work that ensures the perpetual flow of power from those who create power to those who steal it.
B. Productive people wise up, stop sending power to the criminals who steal it, and instead these honest productive people use that portion of their power to effectively deter crime, and therefore have more power to use in the work of creating more power.
Path A has many names:
1. Legal Crime
2. The Dollar Hegemony
3. Enforced legal money monopoly
4. Extortion
5. Organized crime
6. Business as usual
7. Wall Street
8. The New World Order
9. The Business Cycle
10. Nationalism, Fascism, Despotism, Communism, Neo-Liberalism
11. Competition is against the law
12. Involuntary Government
13. Crime
Path B has many names:
1. Freedom
2. Liberty
3. Justice
4. Equity
5. The Golden Rule
6. Universally applied Law and order
7. The Free Market
8. Federated Democratic Republicanism
9. Classical Liberalism
10. Voluntary government
11. Insurance
12. Effective employment of scarce power in the work required to deter crime while enough excess power remains to increase the power supply rather than consume it.
Take any word that works for you and begin to target the one most effective first thing that the productive people can do so as to accomplish the goal of lowering the loss of power to the criminals, and thereby have more power to be used to increase the power supply that is used by productive people toward the work required to make productive people more powerful.
A. Scarce power flows from those who produce it to those who use scarce power to make power scarce.
B. Scarce power flowing to the legal criminals flows less to the legal criminals, by willful act, and therefore the productive people who produce power are more powerful, and the same willful act that begins to reduce the flow of power from the productive people to the legal criminals accelerates the effective reduction of power flowing to the legal criminals.
What is that single effective thing that can turn the evil situation around and begin the process of causing power to once again become abundant instead of scarce?
What is the one thing that can be done that turns on the light bulb, awaken all the productive people, and begins that reversal of the power struggle, causing less and less power flowing to the legal criminals, who use that power to make power scarce, and therefore more and more power remains within the control of the people who earn it, and therefore more and more power is used to create more and more power, and once again the quality of life increases and the cost of life decreases by that one change on policy?
If you are at a loss, please consider that the answer can be known, and I'm going to add a space between this sentence and the next to simulate a "conversation" between the reader, and I, and offer a moment for you, the reader, to come up with a few possible answers.
The question was: What is the one thing that can turn this bad situation around into a good situation? Here is my offering:
1. Legal monetary competition
I'm not alone in this focus of attention by productive people on one thing that can be done, one focus of all the defensive power from all the honest productive people, focused like a laser beam, on one thing that can be done to turn this bad situation around into a good situation.
Alex Jones says:
"You know we are going into Tyranny."
We will win, I hear Alex Jones say, if the good guys take action, and I agree, but what action can be taken?
Hire people who have a solution, a good solution, a workable solution, and get those people to represent you, and turn this thing around by that plan, that workable plan, with that perfectly easy to attain goal.
What plan do the other competitors offer?
The plan that I know will work, and I'm almost certain that Ron Paul knows that this plan is the plan that will work, is the plan where the force of competition is lawful, in particular, the force of competition in money markets is made lawful, and therefore the enforcement of one, and only one, legal money is no longer enforced. The use of productive power in the work of enforcing a monopoly, enforcing monopolies of all kinds, is no longer lawful, and instead the use of productive power in the work of empowering competition is now lawful, and that is the plan, and it starts with competition in legal money.
Once legal money is a competition, among competitors, the stuff that the productive people use to facilitate trade, becomes, by the force of competition, higher in quality, and lower in cost, reaching for the absolute best possible medium of exchange, and one obvious "quality" of this move from bad to good will be the ability of the currency to resist theft by parasitic legal criminals.
Is this too simple? Is this too complicated?