 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Where are the men?
3 of 4
Roughly half of them are women. Where are the productive, honest, hard working, competitive, powerful people, the one's that constitute the power that will overcome the legal criminal powers?
Friend or Foe?
It may be helpful to employ something called a bell curve.
On one extreme end is the worst of the worst legal criminal, the person who makes the worst plans, destroying the most, causing the absolute worst, the top worst evil human waste, on the top of the tip of the worst human immorality there is, or ever was, and that person is one person.
And that person probably has two contenders to that throne more than ready to stab each other in the back, to get the top spot, such is the nature of crime, among criminals, as understand that to be, and I may be wrong - of course.
At the other extreme end of the bell curve is the one most productive, most powerful single person, and the two lesser powerful productive people are ready, willing, and able, to out produce, with greater quality, and lower cost, that best of the best, at the slightest error, the slightest weakness in quality, efficiency, productive ability, economy, and measurable productivity, measurable as surplus wealth.
In the middle are the average people. At what point do you think the moral scale, the supposed thin blue line, appears on that bell curve? I suggest that on the moral scale the friends of morality, the friends of equity, those who may not be charitable, but those who are at least not willfully criminal, number less than 90 percent of the total population. Criminal and victims, master and slaves, is a relationship, a marriage, a co-dependency, and a bond, a connection that requires active willful thoughts and actions that cement, and perpetuate the bond, and the point at which the victims become the victims and the criminals become the criminals is the point at which, or can be seen as the point at which, each person willfully gains, by force of will, at the unmistakable expense of the known, and measurably known, and accurately measurably known victim in clear view, beyond a shadow of doubt by the criminal committing the crime, even if the victim is unaware of such crime. The ratio of criminal to victims, master to slaves, has to be a very low ratio, heavy on the victims, light in the criminals, or production goes negative, quality plummets, wealth is consumed, and the cost of living skyrockets.
The human mind, being able to perceive an imaginary reality, is therefore a mind that can believe in falsehood, and proceed to think and act immorally while being convinced that their thoughts and actions are moral, but under such a condition of false perception, and here is the point, would such a person be productive, or would such a person be destructive by any accurate measure of power, psychological or physical, political or economic?
The glut of people, the majority, produce more than they consume, and the proof is knowable, accurately measurable, as a steady rising standard of living, up to the point at which that measure moves in the other direction.
Who will be in a position to continue cooperating, despite such things as forced reduction in the supply of oil, leading to higher oil prices, forced reductions in the supply of food, and forced expenses accounting for, dealing with, avoiding, and defending against, a criminal government?
The person eying you, at the department store, staring you down, may be one of the willful destroyers of humanity, or he may be a future associate during even tougher conditions of enforced scarcity, enforced power-less-ness, when moral people must adapt better, and must invent better methods by which productive cooperation, productive division of labor, and productive economies of scale are maintained, and productive competition continues to work to force higher quality and lower cost.
"Why are you staring at me?" Asked at a more appropriate moment if the opportunity arises? Accurate discrimination between friend or foe, and innocent until proven guilty?
I have yet to listen to the last part of Alex Jones's Audio blog part 3 of 4, and I have one more comment to add before proceeding.
During my own awakening I had to wrestle with much fear. For example, during the events in Waco Texas, when I saw, on live T.V., tanks crushing and burning a church full of innocent victims down, and as the "Authorities" on the T.V. were claiming that "they were killing themselves", I knew, then, that I could be next, why not, and what happens if I start to sing like a bird?
Let me throw this out to you people, and this angle of view is an experiment for you to try on, a competitive viewpoint; if you will.
Suppose that there was an insurance company and this insurance company sold Anti-Despotism Insurance.
A policy holder pays a premium, and in case of a raid by the ATF, FBI, or CIA, or any government agency of any kind, where the policy holder is injured, the insurance benefit is a measure of money, for compensation for the injury.
What my premium would be before I started singing like a bird, like a canary in the coal mine, chocking out my last breaths, warning, warning, look out people, the British are here, my Anti-Despotism Insurance policy before I began to sing, would have been X, or a number, an amount, a monthly payment into the insurance fund, and then, after I began to sing, that premium would skyrocket.
Imagine that you are the person at the Anti Legal Crime Insurance Company, and you are the actuary, the accountant, the person responsible with crunching the numbers, and you have to come up with the monthly payment for Alex Jones, or you were the one to have to come up with the monthly premium for Martin Luther King, or Jesus, or Andrew Jackson, or John and Robert Kennedy, or how about some of the latest whistle blowing song birds like John Perkins, or Jesse Ventura?
How much do you charge them compared to how much you charge one of the boot licking sycophants who never fail to jump as high as they are told by anyone telling them to jump?
What are the bets? How much money do you bet if you have to bet on the chances of person A or person B being targeted by the legal criminals, the despots in official looking clothes, with, or without badges?
Don't kid yourselves, I didn't, I don't, the most destructive to the power of the legal criminals move higher up their hit list and this isn't debatable, this is a matter of measurable fact.
The fence is an allusion. There is no fence upon which fence sitters sit. The illusory fence, in reality, is a conscious, or a semi-conscious, effort to move weaker victims ahead of you in the line toward destruction, and that is a very painful thing to realize as a person, a moral person with more than a powerless conscience, contemplates the right path to choose; from one moment to the next moment.
A. Stave off movement up the list of victims by moving weaker people ahead of you in line.
B. Begin to work up in line, inevitably, as you begin to awaken yourself and others to the truth.
The line is constructed by the legal criminals, it is their construction, it exists, and there are lists, and there are priorities, and it is a power struggle, and you are either working, producing, to aid, and abet, and become an accessory to those crimes, or you are willfully working against those criminals, to lessen their power.
If their power lessens, the line will be deconstructed, the victims will become fewer, and victimization will slow down, and stop, and at that point law will return to its true color, defensive, voluntary, for the productive people, by the productive people, for the honest people, by the honest people, and law will no longer be a method by which crime is made legal.
Failing to work, the least little bit, in the work of deconstructing that line, failure to realize that there is no fence to sit on, failure to slow down your willingness to lick the boots of your masters, accomplishes something destructive, keep at it, and you get what you pay for, you reap what you sow, you sleep with the fishes, later than those who are weaker than you, and you will have to lie more, and you will have to destroy more, and more, and more, on that path.
There is a thing called objective concern, and it does replace the thing called fear, and there are reasons why, even the weak, gain power in knowledge, accurate knowledge, because that is the stuff of life.
I'm going back to the Audio Blog.
That was the end of part 3 of 4.