 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
On the subject of competition.
A base from which to proceed:
Goals
1. Individual self-preservation
2. Species preservation
Methods to arrive at goals:
I. Voluntary association (mutual agreement)
1. Law (mutual agreement)
a. Profit (at the expense of others)
b. Equity (no net profit at the expense of others)
c. Charity (expend self in service of others)
1. Defense
a. Accurate identification of criminals, their plans, their history, their actions past, present, and possible future
b. Avoidance of contact and injury by criminals
c. Use of defensive deceit and violence when criminals are too powerful to be avoided in time and place
2. Economy
a. Division of labor, specialization, economies of scale
b. Invention, adaptation
c. Competition (non-criminal), higher quality, lower cost, expanding the power supply (surplus wealth) reaching for abundance
II. Involuntary association (crime)
1. Despotism (Law used as a power to subject victims and exempt criminals)
a. Deceit, falsehood, aggression
b. Monopoly, cabal, consortium, organized crime, conspiracy fact (not theory)
2. Offense
a. Target markets for exploitation, including co-conspirators
b. Behavioral modification, brain washing, corrupt language, response conditioning
c. Threats of violence, examples of violence
3. Economy
a. Destroy competition, ensure that power remains scarce, and therefore controllable
b. Select, indoctrinate, and accumulate, expand, criminal powers, higher quality, lower cost criminals (criminal competition)
Note: Crime does not work toward Species Preservation since crime actively, and willingly, consumes surplus wealth; failing to reach for abundance, and in fact, there is a willful effort to maintain power scarcity (see oil - for example).
From that base I can say that it is vitally important to get rid of all the double speak, as much as is expedient, so as to regain control of language. When I refer to the Globalist, or The Establishment, or The Elite, I use the simple, and accurate term: Legal Criminals.
It is vital for any power to gain the power of numbers and in that work it is vital to gain the power of accurate discrimination. to learn, expediently, and precisely, with minimum error, friend from foe.
A Legal Criminal defines his (or her) state of being by willfully (premeditation) planning the injury of an innocent victim and then executing that plan, or hiring, or deceiving, or forcing, other people to plan, and execute the measurable injury of innocent victims, and does so under the protection of The Color of Law (Legal Crime).
Confusion concerning the process of competition, ignorance, and falsehood, clouds, covers-up, hides, adds smoke and mirrors, false fronts, facades, and consumes power, removes power, and renders powerless, the force of non-criminal competition, as non-criminal competitors seek accurate knowledge concerning the goal of accurate discrimination between friends or foes. Confusion empowers criminals at the expense of their victims.
A legal criminal, volunteering to be a legal criminal, by active, and willful, support for plans that aim to injure innocent people, and follow through with accurately measurable injuries to innocent victims, will seek fellow criminals, fellow conspirators, and increase the power of 1 single solitary criminal, and subsequently, with even greater numbers, increase the power of a single individual criminal group.
In other words:
Crime is competitive as criminals compete for a limited number of victims.
Criminals cooperate to form more powerful criminal groups and these criminal groups compete against other criminal groups, turf battles, over the limited number of victims.
Crime groups compete with other crime groups.
Crime groups compete with legal crime groups.
Legal crime groups compete with legal crime groups.
And finally:
Criminals, legal or otherwise, compete for limited power that is produced by the only one's who can produce power, the productive population.
Where the thin blue line is crossed, and where the grey area leads to much confusion, is the area where the productive population rejects voluntary association and incorporates legal crime as a means of gaining power over the competition.
Example:
The use of fraud, or "false advertisement" to gain market share.
The use of behavioral modification routines, response conditioning, subliminal, unconscious brain washing, as a means of gaining market share.
The use of threats of violence and the use of actual violence as a means of gaining market share.
In other words: It is, and always will be, a power struggle.
The non-criminals are the group that has the power to produce surplus wealth, and surplus wealth is the measure of human power, and transfers of surplus wealth from those who create it, to those who steal it by way of legal crime, leaves a paper trail, recorded as legal monopoly money, and therefore there can be a method by which the non-criminals can accomplish the first necessary step to gain the power required in avoidance, and defense against the criminal competitors who are competing for exclusive control over surplus wealth.
The power struggle is between the innocent (the innocent are those who are accurately measurable as perpetrating less, or no, willful plans, and executions of plans, to injure innocent people), the power struggle is between the innocent power producers and the criminals, legal or otherwise, and that power struggle is first, and foremost, a struggle for accurate knowledge, for both criminals and non-criminals alike.
Who get's the credit for producing surplus wealth? Group A
Who takes the credit for producing surplus wealth by criminal means? Group B
Group B already knows who their foes are, which is simple, their foes are everyone, kill or be killed, Machiavellian sub-human mutations born without moral conscious, capable of willfully planning and executing the worst cases of mass torture, mass murder, and worse crimes, including the ultimate crime of lowering the power the human species must have in the work of perpetuating the species.
Group A must gain the power of accurate discrimination between friend and foe, and then expend a minimum amount of power dealing with, by avoidance if possible (clearly it is possible with enough power in numbers), or by confrontation if necessary and then only when at a level of power that makes crime unprofitable according to the judgment of the criminals. In other words a force must be put in place that deters crime, ends it, without blood shed, or, we become them in the effort to beat them.
Therefore there are two major competitive forces and there are sub competitions within those groups, and confusing the two major competitive forces, as if they are one, empowers the criminal group at the expense of the non-criminal group.
A. Crime
B. Non crime
Both groups are in competition over the power known as surplus wealth. Competition from the A group consumes surplus wealth and destroys competition as a rule, as a necessity, since too much power, abundant power, empowers the victims who no longer are victims when they gain power sufficient to accomplish the work of avoiding victimization.
Within the A group the method by which competition is conducted is, as a rule, agreement between criminals to stop fighting over the limited number of victims, and to increase their criminal power over their victims by accessing division of labor, specialization, and economies of scale, and gain sufficient power by those economic means to arrive at a level of power sufficient to over power the targeted victims, and defend against other criminal groups; legal or otherwise.
Withing the B group the method by which competition is conducted is, by mutual agreement among non-criminals, to avoid resorting to crime (crime already defined as willful acts against innocent victims) in the work of using power to make more power, to be productive, to increase the supply of surplus wealth, and in so doing the quality of life increases, and the cost of life decreases, so long as a sufficient amount of power is employed in the work of avoiding victimization, effectively, and not sent to those who make us suffer, and enough is left over to invest surplus wealth where more surplus wealth is the result of such productive investments.
Higher quality at lower cost is forced into being by (productive) competition.
As non-criminals work toward satisfying the non-criminal demands of everyone, or anyone, else, they are inspired to produce the highest quality product and exchange it for the lowest cost to the consumer, or, failing that goal, someone else will succeed at that goal, and therefore the loser is inspired to work better, or find a better job where quality is a specialty for that person, at that job, and where work is more enjoyable for that person at a better job, and therefore the cost of working is less for that producer, that producer who has found the job he, or she, can do where their product is the best, and their product is sold at the lowest cost to the consumer, the winner of that competition.
Criminal competition, can be confused with non-criminal competition, to the benefit of the criminals, and at the expense of the victims, innocent or otherwise, and criminal competition includes every conceivable method, not limited to torture, and not limited to mass murder, and not even limited to the end of the human species, as the method of choice, the most competitive method, by which a criminal is the best criminal, at the lowest cost to the best criminal, and the best criminal passes on all costs to the consumers.
Non-criminal competition produces competition, encourages it, empowers it, welcomes it, agrees with it, uses it, and is forced by it, to move production, and life, toward higher quality, non-criminal life, and lower cost, non-criminal life, at the expense of no one.
Non-criminal competition increases, exponentially, the supply of surplus wealth, the same supply that can feed the criminal group, if the supply of surplus wealth is allowed to flow to, and finance, the criminal group, legal or otherwise. Power invested in productive use is inversely proportional to power wasted in destructive, or criminal, use; naturally, and as a matter of fact. If the surplus wealth supply is decreasing, it is due to crime, and the ineffective use of power to avoid crime, or the reverse, where productive power is sent to criminals, legal or otherwise. Power can be abundant, power is abundant, without criminals sucking up all the power, power can be even more abundant, and the criminals are then left with two major choices:
A. Charity
B. Find a competitive, productive, non-criminal job (I can speak of this in great detail)
Criminal competition decreases surplus wealth, consumes it, and adds to the work load as the non-criminals expend power, and waste power if power is stolen under the color of law, in the work of defending against crime, and criminal competition must, by necessity, destroy all competition where ever and when ever competition arises. Criminal competition is a monopoly power, it is crime, and each criminal must kill or be killed in that competition, and any momentary alliance, within a criminal power structure, must be the same criminal code of conduct, where the weak are eliminated, or used up, and the strong vie for control over each other, lying, cheating, stealing, from each other, in the work of rendering their competition power-less.
Non-criminal competition does not seek to render the competition powerless, by definition, an employment of power used in the willful work required to render a competitor power-less, is a willful act, perpetrated, so as to injure the intended victim, innocent or otherwise, and to gain power at the expense of the target.
Non-criminal competition seeks to gain power, and the result of gaining power (not willfully gaining power at the expense of a targeted victim - competitor) will be an increase in power over the competition, to gain the power to produce higher quality, and to gain the power to produce lower cost, which appears to be, at the expense of, a competitor, but, think, please, what is the competitor inspired to do, if the competitor is non-criminal, once a competitor out produces and out sells the loser?
Be more competitive.
The criminal solution is the same old tired one, in their own words, The Final Solution, eliminate competition.
Who wants to be inspired by competition to produce higher quality at lower cost?
Who prefers something for nothing (relatively speaking)?
In order to reinforce the above understanding of competition I will add that in a Federated Republic, as opposed to a Nation State, the idea is to force competition among separate and sovereign State governments, within the protection of the voluntary union, as opposed to an involuntary union, and thereby empower the producers of wealth (those who are capable of financing government other than a government that is financed by crimes such as successful aggressive wars for profit), empower the "tax payers" with the power of a veto on a low quality, high cost, oppressive separate and sovereign State, within the voluntary union, by voting with their feet, and moving from the more oppressive State, to the less oppressive State, to move from the low quality government to the high quality government, thereby forcing the governing group to satisfy the demands of the productive group.
Failure to satisfy the demands of the productive group within a Federated Republic leads to a lower and lower market share, as the unsatisfied productive people group their productive behinds in the less oppressive State.
Suppose, for example, that the current government in America was a working Federated Republic, rather than a Nation State (see Patric Henry for greater details on that accurate discrimination), and suppose that Massachusetts was the one State, in the voluntary union, that began, and perpetuated, aggressive wars for profit, and failed repeatedly in succeeding to take the profits from the targeted country, say Canada, and then suppose, that some of the citizens in Massachusetts decided to move to Vermont, rather than continue to pay taxes to a criminal government bent on conducting treacherous, and treasonous, aggressive wars for profit; what then would the people running the Federated Republic do, in such a case?
Would the people running the Federated Republic make a law that enforced the return of a tax evader from one separate and sovereign state to another?
If the people retain their power to avoid oppression by moving freely from one separate and sovereign state to another, then state governments would be forced, by competition, to improve quality, and lower cost. The world government, a single monopoly, with one single criminal power over all other criminal powers, and over all productive people, is the obvious goal of any organized crime structure - as easy to see as sunlight on a warm summer day.
If the power producers, the one's who are the only ones who can finance anything, governments, businesses, whatever, even criminal governments, and even criminal businesses, if those power producers want their government to keep up the good work, invading more and more, profiting more and more, on aggressive wars for profit, then that is what they are, and it may be difficult to accurately discriminate them from any other criminal, on principle, if not body count, or the volume of screams emitted by the tortured innocent victims.
In short, it may be a good idea to avoid confusing competition with crime. One is not the other, and confusing the two leads to more crime, and less power for the victims.