 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
I have some news to offer, and I plan on conveying this news here, as I have worked other forums, have been censored from other forums, and even resorting to producing my own forum.
The news I have is contained within my political economy LAW, which has my name on it, for lack of any previous mention of this political economy LAW.
Joe's Law:
Power produced into oversupply (abundant power) reduces the price of power (oxygen is power, what is the price of oxygen?), while purchasing power increases (deflation, or, more bang for the buck) because power (productive power: knowledge, food, oxygen, transportation fuel, electricity, human labor, etc.) reduces the cost of production.
What, you may say, has that sentence, that Joe's Law, got to do with the current situation?
I want to answer that question by offering a possible, easy to understand, future reality, whereby the illustrated future reality explains, in detail, how Joe's Law works, and how the opposite of Joe's Law works, by contrast.
The opposite of Joe's Law can be illustrated by a future reality whereby food production is governed into a state of scarcity, transportation fuel is governed down to a state of scarcity, and most certainly knowledge is governed down into a state of scarcity, and what happens as a result.
Joe's Law (food)
Food (power) produced into a state of scarcity (purposefully making food scarce) increases the price of food (high demand and many people bidding the price up) while purchasing power decreases (inflation, or less bang for the buck) because a lack of power increases the cost of production.
Everyone must have food, it is a cost of living, it is a cost of production, and therefore food governed down into a state of scarcity causes inflation.
Joe's Law (Oil)
Oil (power) produced into a state of scarcity (purposefully making oil scarce) increases the price of oil (high demand and many people bidding the price up) while purchasing power decreases (inflation, or less bang for the buck) because a lack of transportation power increases the cost of production.
Everyone knows what happens when gasoline prices go up, I am showing, by way of Joe's Law, how that works, simply.
Knowledge overpowers ignorance, and it also reduces the cost of production, and it is also made scarce, on purpose, for some reason, by some people, and the result is monetary inflation.
Before the reader dismisses my angle of view as irrelevant, or having no power, I now offer an illustrated example of how political economy can be adjusted, simply, so as to expose anyone who has any doubt as to how easy it would be to turn the whole financial economy, the whole political economy, right side up, instead of up-side-down.
The reader may get done with the following illustration and be empowered to ask questions. I can only hope so.
What do you think would be the result of a change in political policy, on the subject of finances, whereby the legal powers, and the financial powers offer two new financial instruments as follows:
Product 1 (One part of a two part illustration that explains Political Economy by way of illustration)
No interest loans to anyone wanting to use legal money for the purpose of buying a home, or paying off an existing (interest bearing) loan, or for the purpose of buying one business property.
It may be necessary, to help the reader understand the power of this illustration, the power this illustration has in the work of explaining political economy, by explaining a few things about Product 1.
Interest, for product one, can be determined by market forces, and in order for market forces to work, there must be competition. Having no competition forcing quality up, and price down, is a situation called a monopoly, or cabal, or consortium, or whatever word points to a single supplier and no competitive suppliers, where the consumers have only one choice, where all the other choices are forced out of business, and the consumer has only one choice.
When competitors are competing the result will be higher quality, at lower costs, and failure to produce higher quality, at lower cost, while a competitor competes with higher quality, at lower cost, results in more, and more, consumers choosing higher quality, and lower cost, and that sends more power to the producer of higher quality and lower cost, and that results in less power going to the producer of lower quality and higher cost, and that is the force that forces quality up and cost down.
What would be the free market interest rate? That is one of the questions, that this illustration intends to help lead the reader to the answer.
I offer to the reader an illustrated politically economic product that could be offered by the law makers and the financial product business people (in competition with other financial product business people) at a minimum price, not negative (dumping, giveaway, giving away the razor so as to sell the blades), and not positive (cost recuperation, or profit), and so the illustration, for now, is zero percent interest.
Product 1 is zero percent interest, or free market forced interest rate, and Product 1 is intended to help the reader see more than one simple facet of political economy at once.
Sit yourself down at the bank where Product 1 is being sold, in America, or anywhere on the planet, and think, use your own brain.
Example:
You:
"You are saying that I can get this product and I can use this product to pay off my current home mortgage?"
Bank employee:
"Yes, Mr. Kelley...
Me:
"Call me Joe. I don't like titles, we are just people, to me."
Bank employee:
"Joe, look at the brochure, yes, and you qualify, you are above the minimum FICO score, you have earned a no interest home mortgage, and with this loan your total home purchase price is cut in half, roughly, and you no longer have to pay the bank for two homes, when you get only one, and if you want you can now cut your monthly payments in half, starting this month. Does that sound too good to be true?"
You:
"How do you make any money?"
Bank employee:
"Look at the brochure, we now have the competitive legal franchise to offer Product 1 and Product 2, and we will make a ton of cash on Product 2, just look at the numbers, and how many people do you think will be buying both products from us, we intend to corner the market, we will be offering the highest quality at the lowest cost, to you, don't worry, look at the numbers, we will be making money hand over fist too."
You:
"Sounds like a Pyramid, or Ponzi Scheme"
Bank Employee:
"The old banking monopoly was a Ponzi Scheme, sir, this is legal competition in money markets, we are offering 2 products, if you prefer to pay a higher interest rate on your mortgage, be my quest."
So, to you the reader, I try to get you looking at this with a more inquisitive mind, my intention is not to brain wash you, my intention is to communicate the knowledge I have earned up to this point.
A "socialist" or "government" financial loan, if it were non-profit, would be no charge. The "service" of offering loans would be no different than offering 911 police, ambulance, fire, national defense, or road construction services. Please consider getting past the socialism versus capitalism dog and pony show.
Look at some of the numbers involved in the enforcement of the current monopoly banking system concerning only home mortgage loans.
Rough numbers can be derived from the 3 hundred million population of America, taking only 1 hundred million from that number to represent a rough number of home owners, a rough number of people paying mortgage interest rates. Take a rough average home mortgage to be 1 hundred thousand dollars, and then know that a rough 30 year period of time transfers 1 hundred million times 1 hundred thousand dollars worth of EARNINGS from those who EARN to those who run banking monopolies.
100,000,000 times 100,000 = 10,000,000,000,000
Product 1 illustrates the opposite of what is, and it quantifies what is, and it shows what can be, and it quantifies what can be, and it does so simply, and it does so in a way that the viewer of the illustration can begin to ask pertinent questions, and get vital accurate answers.
Instead of 10,000,000,000,000 going from those who earn purchasing power to those who steal it (by making fraud legal), over 30 years, the opposite happens.
10,000,000,000,000 units of purchasing power remains in control of those who earn that purchasing power, the people who create that power to purchase keep that power they created.
That is only product 1.
Please also know that the 10,000,000,000,000 units of purchasing power that does transfer from those who earn it to those who steal it is then used to keep that power to steal going, and going, and going. The legal criminals use the power they steal to maintain their power to steal, and in order to maintain their power to steal, they must consume that power in the work of eliminating competition, even it they think they have to torture, and even if they think they have to mass murder, even if they thing they have to lie, and even if they think they have to take everyone to the brink of extinction, so as to keep their power over us.
10,000,000,000,000 is not chicken feed.
What would you do with the money you save each month if you have no more mortgage interest payments flowing from you to the legal banking monopoly? What happens to your personal economy? What happens if almost everyone chooses Product 1, not just you?
Moving onto product 2, as an illustration for your consideration, exposing what is, and leading to that which can be, I can explain how the competitive banking business earns their profits, as they sell Product 2, along with Product 1.
Product 2 is a 1 percent interest loan to anyone buying Product 1, who also wants to use the purchasing power they earn in the work of using power to make more power, and this loan is only used to buy specific things, such as Solar Panels, or Electric cars, or Modular Vertical Farming units, or anything that is proven to be a net power producer, whereby the money loaned does, in fact, create more power by that specific use of that money.
Go back, if you will, to you (or me), at the Bank, talking to the Bank employee (or even done on-line), where you are thinking about joining everyone else, and you are choosing to use your power to create more power.
You:
"OK, so, suppose I do buy into this product 1..."
Bank employee:
"And cut your current monthly mortgage payment in half."
You:
"Yes, I got that, I saw the numbers, and I'm not convinced that it isn't a scam, but suppose I do that, and then suppose I go and get those three things you say I can get with another loan, I go into more debt, why would I do that?"
Bank employee:
"Solar power is now cheaper than the cost of buying electricity from the Central Power Monopoly, yes or no?"
You:
"I don't know."
Bank employee:
"You can now call someone up and they will guarantee a lower electric bill if you would let them install Solar Panels on your home, did you know that?"
You:
"I heard rumors."
Bank employee:
"Assume as much, and know that once you have the Solar Panels, and the low monthly loan payment (less than your electric payment per month), your costs are fixed, except if you adjust for inflation, which is now deflation, deflation because of Product 1 and Product 2, but the point here is, that the Central Power Company price is going up. You, by this loan, become independent from that cost of living increase. You get out from under that monopoly power, with this loan, and that has not even begun to touch upon the savings you get with the Electric car and/or the home food power product, and, you may not yet know, the home food power product can also make gasoline out of algae, at competitive prices, if you want to keep a gasoline powered car, or if you want to sell gasoline for extra income."
You
"I already have a job, I don't need extra income, my work consumes all my free time, I like my free time, so does my wife, she works too, and my son works too, we all work, and we don't need profit making enterprises at home."
Bank employee:
"If food prices go up, and if gasoline prices go up, and if electric prices go up, you can get Product 2 now, and you can eliminate that cost of living increase, become independent from it, now, or later, or never, this isn't an enforced cost of living, this is the opposite, it is your choice."