 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Anyone,
Each step of the way out of falsehood is a right step, a true step, and as any scientist will warn, the person stepping must be aware of the possibility of error.
The link above links each individual person clicking on the link to an interview between two relatively famous people involved in political economy.
The individuals who listen to those people may want to know the truth, and then again the individuals who listen to those people may want to know their lines in the script.
A. Keeping in mind that there is a possibility of error; is this the truth?
B. My empty brain is ready for more falsehood, give it to me, please.
Which type of person are you?
C. Blank
I don't know, this is a one-way show here, since discussion is against protocol. The script say so, read your lines, you have no part here, you have no speaking lines in this sphere called Political/Economy.
I will speak for those in Group A, and possibly those in group C (whatever that may be), and I will walk you through the link above, and offer evidence that raises the awareness of possible error.
Listen to the link and stop at the point where Gerald Celente speaks of The Constitution.
I have news for him. The Constitution had American people speaking out against it, before it was forced into being The Law of the Land.
Do you understand the significance of that measure of doubt concerning any move, any right step, from this moment, to the next moment in time?
Those American people who were against the constitution had many warnings and one very damning one in particular.
1. Those who get to interpret the constitution get to say that the constitution says anything they want it to say at any given moment and therefore the constitution is no better, a potentially much worse, than an open, in your face, dictatorship.
I am not speaking about new things, this is forgotten stuff, this is stuff hidden in plain sight, this is the stuff of a thing once called liberty, which is the stuff of what was once a goal, a goal that individuals seek, where the individual seizes his, or her, own power to write his, or her, own script, and where the individual rejects the idea that he, or she, is powerless to do so, and rejects the idea that we, you, me, and anyone else, must say nothing until we are handed our part in the script.
Number 2 on the list of things spoken about, in opposition to the constitution was the end of trial by jury.
That end, the end of trial by jury, ends each individuals power of veto.
In the past, when dictators were openly known as dictators, criminals without badges, criminals without a license, thugs, highway men, robbers, rapists, killers, open killers, torturers, mass murderers, operators of dungeons, where employees seek confessions, at any cost to the confessors, in the open, in your face, and who cares if you spoke the truth, who cares if you call the spade a spade, everyone knew, who could not know, that the dictator was one - then?
Back then a thing was invented, and that thing was trial by jury, and that thing created a check upon dictatorship, and the dictator of that day knew that it was check mate, his game, King John the dictator of that time, knew his game was over.
Game over - trial by jury - each individual gains the power of veto.
The people not reading from the script exercised their power of veto, choosing not to read from the script, and their words warned the rest of us about the constitution, how the constitution can be judged to mean anything the judge wants it to mean, and how that fact wasn't even the worst of it, how the fact that trial by jury ends, adds to the warning about the constitution, and how life will be much worse after the constitution is forced into being, much worse for liberty, much better for dictators.
Dictatorship = the constitution, be warned, then, not now?
So, today, why would someone suggest, what is the point of suggesting, that there is a false step, as the step is made away from the constitution? Why say that it is wrong to step away from the constitution?
The facts clearly show that the constitution was, in fact, a step away from liberty, and a step toward despotism, as told by those speaking that warning when that warning was spoken, and now forgotten.
Dictators may include a few, in that group, who are benevolent, nice, polite, and unwilling to torture and mass murder innocent people, babies, teenagers, old people, whole families, etc. so as to remain a powerful dictator.
The test, of course, occurs when the dictator is faced with a future step, that the dictator must take, where evidence suggests that one step will weaken his, or her, power to keep power, and the other step avoids that weakening.
A. Risk dictatorial power loss.
B. Not A
Here is some news for you:
Dictators don't get to be dictators by taking steps away from dictatorship.
Criminals don't get to be criminals by taking steps away from crime.
That is not a coincidence.
Liars lie.
Thieves steal.
Torturers torture.
Those who hire torturers torture.
Victims read from the script.
Please, sir, can I have some more, torture?
Please, can you pile some more innocent bodies on the mass murdered pile, if not today, soon?
That is what I hear when I hear someone claim that "Suddenly" things went wrong when this person, or that person, stepped away from the constitution. Why would someone say that moving away from the constitution is a bad thing? If someone does something bad, someone does something bad, what is it that was bad?
Torture for profit?
Mass Murder for profit?
Failing to provide the interpretation of the constitution required to justify torture and mass murder for profit this time?
Really, which script is being read, and who wrote it?
Why? Why did they write that script?
When people choose the steps that walk away from dictatorship, people create surplus wealth, and they prefer to do so, because failing to do so, is more miserable, and less enjoyable.
Having nothing is miserable, having less is even more miserable.
Having nothing but miserable work, just to make someone else more powerful, is enjoyable?
Having something enjoyable is worth stepping toward, once known as the pursuit of happiness.
Surplus wealth is made by people who are not on the dictator path, and this could be as well understood as the fact that the constitution was a wrong step, for people who are not on the dictator path. The dictators path is the path that takes from those who make wealth.
Obey
There is no "or else" (even that is a lie).
For those on the dictator path, I think you should, at least, be aware of your part in that script.
There is always a bigger dictator, and the biggest one will have the most people reading from their script. and the script says obey, and the end result is the flow of power from those who create it to the bigger dictators, and to the biggest dictator.
Where is all the surplus wealth going, one might ask, so as to know which dictator, or dictatorship, will be the biggest one, sooner or later?
Steps will be taken, by those who are following the script, so as to move surplus wealth, power, to the most powerful dictator, or dictatorship. You can take that to the bank.
Follow the money, where is it going?
I'm going back to the link, they may offer clues on the money trail.
Even if you refuse to know, your life may depend upon knowing the truth, instead of believing in lies.
I listened to the rest of that news story, and I have more news for you.
Back in the last century, 1990s, the same decade I ran for congress, I attended a "Conference" conducted by Lew Rockwell and the boys, the Austrian Economists (political) boys, and I tried to get answers about China from them, back then, and note, please note, that the message from that news story, that interview, didn't even mention China.
The money may very well be flowing to China, booming China, and busting America, on purpose. If so, who, or what group, will be the biggest dictatorship then?
A few things:
1. The legal criminals claim that "we" are broke, pay up, we are broke, pay up, we are broke, pay more taxes, we are broke, work harder, we are broke, and it goes on and on like a broken record.
Do you think that that message is true?
The ones who write that script are not broke, they have your power, and they stole it.
If you have the smallest of a shadow of doubt, about the accuracy of that message about how "we" are broke, then look into CAFR. You can do it. I don't have to give you the script.
Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports
Look it up, or not.
2. The people running The Federal Reserve System (of legal crime) doubled the number of dollars in 2008, and it is a secret (they know, you don't) as to where all that money went. That is a lot of power, your power, if you read from the script.
3. The people spending that money cause all the prices of things sold for dollars to double, roughly, so the people spending that money get everything for half price. If you don't understand that much, go ahead and blame me, for my lack of ability to clue you in. If they double the money supply today, and buy one thing today, they own that one thing today, tomorrow they can sell it, at what price?
A. The total number of dollars yesterday was x
B. The total number of dollars today is 2x (twice what it was yesterday)
C. The people who spend the new money (1x) buy one thing at today's price.
D. The people who have that one thing want to sell that one thing tomorrow.
What is the price tomorrow? The answer is:
Roughly double.
Do you have this yet?
A. The total number of dollars is x yesterday.
B. The total number of dollars is 2x today.
C. The people spending 1x buy one thing for the price 1x
D. The people now owning one thing priced 1x sell it tomorrow.
E. The people selling the one thing get 2x for selling the thing they bought for 1x
How much money is there today?
2x - because the people at The Federal Reserve System (of legal crime) doubled the money supply of dollars in 2008. What will they buy with that purchasing power?
Will they buys something? Do you understand that they will cause the power of the dollar to drop in half, which means, that prices will double - unless - and this is a long shot, unless that money is used to buy things that make more surplus wealth.
Confused?
4. That money will be spent on something, or that money will not be spent on something, on purpose, for profit, their profit, at your expense, and the fact that you don't know what is or isn't purchased, is the important fact.
5. What if?
What if that money, double the supply of dollars, was spent on two things?
A. No interest loans to people with good credit (interest is charged to those without good credit because those with bad credit cause higher costs and therefore those with bad credit pay for their own mistakes and learn or don't learn at their own expense) for a home mortgage and/or business mortgage ANYWHERE ON EARTH = no one is excluded = universal law = no enforced end of competition = no abuse of law to enforce monopoly power.
You can now buy a home and business property for roughly half price (because you don't have to pay the "interest" which is roughly double the price of the home or business property)
B. One percent interest loans for Solar Panels, Electric Cars, and Modular Green House Vertical Farming units, and anything that qualifies as a power producing investment that will increase surplus wealth as a known fact, proven, at the time the loan is made. You buy things with a loan, things that make the power you need to pay back the loan, plus a small interest charge to cover the costs expended in processing the loans.
You can now borrow the power needed to pay back the loan, plus a small charge for each individual and a very large amount of power from many individuals flowing back to the people who produce and sell the loans.
You now have a new script, what will you do with it?
The old script leads to torture and mass murder on a more massive scale, which is hard to imagine considering the examples of WWI, WWII, etc., and the old script may even lead to the extinction of the human species, and you throw the new script in the round file?
Real News?
One more avenue, loose end, something to tie up neatly - in a bow tie:
The Constitution may be a step back from worse dictatorship to less bad dictatorship, arguably, and to that I offer an overall viewpoint, from which to write your own script.
The Constitution was sold as one thing, by frauds, so as to get what they got, and so it is a good idea, perhaps, to look at the thing they were advertising - not the thing they got.
They were advertising one thing.
They sold something else.
The people who bought it, the constitution, thought they were getting the thing advertised.
They bought something else.
Is it a good idea to look at the thing advertised, so long as the thing advertised in not confused with the thing sold, bought, and consumed by the target market?
If so, then listen up.
The thing advertised was a pyramid scheme with a back door. The thing sold was a pyramid scheme without a back door.
A City in America, according to the advertisement, could be a dictatorship in competition with another dictatorship down the road in another City, in America. People who didn't like the dictatorship in one city in America could walk, vote with their feet, to the better city.
Dictators had to be better than the competition down the road.
Dictators had to offer a higher quality dictatorship - at a lower cost to the consumer (or target markets, or victims), failing to provide the higher quality dictatorship, at the lower price, resulted in a very poor situation for the failing dictatorship as all the victims went somewhere else - too bad for the bad dictator. How does that sound, as an advertisement campaign?
An American County was run the same way.
An American State was run the same way, competitive, in competition with the next State North, the next State South, East, or West.
Anyone, (except designated non-tax paying slaves), could pack up and go to the better dictatorship, slaving to pay less taxes, for more return on that involuntary tax investment. How does that sound for an advertisement campaign?
Taxes are too high in Massachusetts, and those crooks running that dictatorship have used the tax money to invade Canada on aggressive wars for profit, and they lost that war, so, naturally, I am moving to Pennsylvania, where taxes are less, and I get more. How is that for an advertisement campaign?
That is what they were selling. Free market dictatorships, competing to gain the most market share, by offering the highest quality dictatorship, at the lowest cost to the designated tax payers.
Non-tax paying slaves were not sold the freedom to choose the better dictator over the worse one, unless a non-tax paying slave "won the lottery" and was then able to buy the right to choose to move up from non-tax paying slave, without the power to relocate at will, to tax paying slave, having the power to relocate at will.
A. Pay taxes or move somewhere else
B. Don't pay "taxes", but have all the power of wealth you create through work taken, and since you are power-less, you can't relocate to a better place, you are property, someone's property, or some corporations property, according to the sales pitch, which isn't for you anyway, you are "disenfranchised".
The fine print was written into the thing sold, the constitution, you have to read it to understand.
A. Tax-payers are free to leave.
B. Non tax payers (people who actually create wealth) are property - not free to leave.
That was then, the hard sell, and the advertisement.
The "Republic" was supposed to be a force for good, a power used in defense against invaders, invaders who may want to conduct aggressive wars for profit, enslave us locals, beware, bad guys are targeting one of "our" States, bad guys are seeking us as their next target market, we are ripe for their exploitation, and therefore the "Republic" was offered as a deterrent, as a fix, and as voluntary as each City, as liberated as each County, and as good as each State within the Voluntary Union of Separate and Sovereign States, Counties, and Cities.
If you don't like things in one state, vote with your feet, and the dictators in each state compete to gain the most market share by offering the highest quality dictatorship, at the lowest cost to the consumer of dictatorships.
That is what was advertised; based upon the Swiss model republic, or a hybrid, a new voluntary union where each mini-dictatorship can join or leave the union at will, if the leaders of the republic go too far toward absolute dictatorship, a state could vote with their feet - by voluntary law.
See you later - alligator. I'm not playing that game, not on my dime.
Each state had a veto.
That was what was advertised, that was not what was sold.
Again, this isn't news, this is old news, and not everyone read from the script, then, not everyone believed in the false advertisement campaign, not everyone swallowed the whole lie whole, and not everyone kept silent during that move from voluntary liberty toward absolute dictatorship, and some people, even back then, fingered the real criminals as the criminals who stole the power over money, and thereby control over the supply of surplus wealth.
Check mate against absolute despotism was, and can again be, trial by jury, or any power of veto held by everyone, including the people who actually create surplus wealth, note here, that a criminal does have the power of veto, they don't read from the script.
A. Trial by Jury gives license to everyone so as to empower everyone with the power to stop the enforcement of any law in each case tried. One juror can nullify each case tried, in each case tried.
B. Criminals nullify every law they don't follow, they already have the power of veto.
C. Legal criminals enforce crime, by making and enforcing laws that move power from those who earn it to those who the criminals choose to get the power stolen - themselves or their employees. This is really that simple. A law that does not apply to everyone is a crime. It is that simple. A law that takes power from someone, a targeted special group, and exempts everyone else, is crime, no different than any other crime. A victim is targeted, the victim is injured, the power flows from the victim to the criminal, and that is as simple as it gets.
You are confused by my writing? A criminal nullifies each law they don't obey themselves, while the same law is followed by all the people who follow that same law. That is a power transfer. Law is either universal, applies to everyone, or it is crime, applies to some, at the expense of everyone else.
If you have been reading from the script you are up-side-down. Criminals don't obey laws, laws do not apply to them. Who does that leave?
The script is for the people who believe in such things as morality and, perhaps, moral law. Obey that law, while I don't.
See?
Check mate against liberty is, and always will be, an enforced belief that crime is law, once the victims believe it, it is check mate.