 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
I am really dissapointed in the effectiveness of this forum. All respect to Mr.Kelly, but man your effective in killing any and all threads that arise.
Anyone,
To be effective, and to avoid disappointment, one might want to entertain the possibility that the power to be effective, and avoid disappointment, is internal to the individual.
Blaming external forces may not be a good path to travel upon, if the idea is to be effective, and to avoid disappointment.
Questions:
1. Why would we open the oil reserves?
2. Why haven't HHO powered vehicles cone to fruition?
3. Why is the 2 party system killing the middle class?
First:
1. Why would we open the oil reserves?
I didn't open the oil reserves, and apparently the person asking the question didn't either, otherwise the person asking the question would know why "we" (because he is one of "we") opened the oil reserves.
If the person asking the question knows who opened the oil reserves, then the question could be answered by that person, and then the answer would have to be accurate, not false, and I think the more important question is:
Who has the power to open the oil reserves, or who owns the oil reserves?
That is similar to asking: Who owns the oil reserves in Iraq?
Who do you ask?
Will the person you ask tell you the accurate answer, or dodge the question?
I think that there is a very good, and very expensive, book that may help in the effort to answer the question asked, and that book is just after a repeat of the question:
First:
1. Why would we open the oil reserves?
The Energy Non-Crisis
Why is that book so expensive?
Question 2:
2. Why haven't HHO powered vehicles cone to fruition?
The quick answer is: ignorance
Too many people are ignorant concerning the economy of switching to water based fuel.
A very good source of information on that question is linked below.
Water as Power
The more complex answer, I think, involves the explanation of how the force of government is usurped from a force of defense against crime to a force that is crime, where the legal criminals use the power of government in the work of eliminating competition.
Example:
The power to end competition
A different reason has come to light recently and makes MUCH more sense. You see, during the 1920's America was roaring forward with easy credit. Everyone seemed to be a winner. As roads were being cut across the country side, automobile sales exploded. This is great for the Ford Motor Company, but what was not written into your government approved history book is that our ingenious and inventive grandparents were running their new cars on uncle Erny's moonshine. Ask you friendly mechanic. It is not difficult to get a car engine to run on alcohol. This situation was dire indeed to Mr. Rockefeller and his Standard Oil Company. They had just discovered (1911) a massive oil field in Drumright, Oklahoma and needed someone to buy all this black gold... Homemade auto fuel had to be eliminated. As was typical of the time, they hired the public relations (PR man) psychologist and the commercial media to create a public outcry against alcohol consumption and public drunkenness. They passed the 18th amendment and immediately sent the FBI out into the countryside to destroy all major distilling operations. At the same time, Standard Oil began construction of "gas stations" all around the country.
A similar event occurred as a result of many competitive products produced by the Hemp plant.
Examples:
Ford hemp car
Hemp based construction material
3. Why is the 2 party system killing the middle class?
The question asked is a loaded question. The 2 party system isn't killing anything. The usurpation of the force of government, by legal criminals, is a knowable fact, once that fact is known, by anyone wanting to know, the question above can be seen as a loaded question.
The victims of the crimes "killing the middle class" can stop blaming false "causes" and begin defending against further victimization - or not.
++++++++++++++++++++++
I sent the above to The Real News Network on a separate Topic, so as to avoid being falsely accused of wrong doing. I do not intend to invade someone's private conversations, but who is willing to tolerate public slander?