View single post by Joe Kelley
 Posted: Wed Feb 23rd, 2011 12:59 pm
PM Quote Reply Full Topic
Joe Kelley

 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
Austerity And The Budget Wars

Well, in truth, the government--the deficit that the federal government has been running in the United States is pretty much entirely the product of three things.

Anyone,

I am very interested in fleshing out, or flushing out, all the stupidity here, seriously, there are very few words I can choose from, and by my choice convey an accurate message, the message being broadcast in this Real News report is stupid.

The "deficit" is a device by which the victims of legal crime are rendered power-less, stupefied, and unable thereby to defend against victimization.

The deficit is therefore, in actual reality, a product of one thing:

Legal crime; where the legal criminals seize the power to take surplus wealth from those who produce surplus wealth and then the legal criminals employ that stolen surplus wealth in the necessary work that is required to keep that surplus wealth flowing to them.

If anyone has an interest in knowing the truth in greater detail, and therefore anyone has an interest in knowing how legal crime is facilitated into being, and perpetuated, then such an interest in knowing would accurately identify one more thing on this paper trail.

The "deficit" device is produced by the legal criminals through the willful crime of seizing the legal license to produce and maintain the one and only (monopoly) legal money supply used by all the targeted people who use that money to create surplus wealth, and once that legal power to add or subtract from the numbers of legal money units, dollars in the case of the American "deficit" crime, is stolen, the legal criminals use that power to increase or decrease the money supply to buy political power, and then spend the surplus wealth, and then profit from the expenditures of surplus wealth, and then make, physically make, the victims pay all the costs that are collected as a result of all the expenditures ordered by those legal criminals who have seized the power over money and then the power over political power.

A. No deficit

B. Legal criminals seize the power over the money supply

C. Legal criminals now have unlimited purchasing power

D. Legal criminals buy political power, they employ "representatives" in the work of passing laws, whereby the laws out-law competition, and specifically the laws out-law competition in money markets, and out-law competition in political markets, making it impossible for The People to use better money, instead of the legal crime money, and make it impossible for The People to hire better politicians, because the laws purchased with the money stolen subsidize legal crime.

E. The legal criminals hide the profits, by creating and maintaining 2 sets of books, one ledger is complete and accurate, where all net receipts and all expenses are recorded, and the total income is known and divided among the legal criminals only, while the second set of books are "for public consumption" whereby a "budget" is advertised and when the "budget" is exceeded there is an advertised "short fall" which is done so as to inspire the "tax payers" (victims) to send more money to the legal criminals, rather than have the victims clued in, knowing the truth, and avoiding victimization.

This isn't a new thing.

This is an old thing.

Here are the words from the people who have gone there, done that, and for someone to repeat this, is for someone to be, as the saying goes, insane, for doing the same thing over and over again, expecting a different result.

Common Sense in the past

Society in every state is a blessing, but government even in its best state is but a necessary evil in its worst state an intolerable one; for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries by a government, which we might expect in a country without government, our calamities is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer!

This Real News report is pure fiction, it is false propaganda, these people are reading from a script written by legal criminals. If the people reading from the script are unaware of their part in this crime, then they are unaware, and innocent, merely clue-less victims, like many of us. If they know the truth, then they are no longer innocent, they aid and abet legal crime.

They are speaking about this:

U.S. Debt Clock crime in progress

Any rational human being, one who has not been brainwashed, can add, and use the tool known as math, and use math effectively, and use math accurately to solve math problems, and thereby be armed,  armed with math and armed with rational thought, and the human being can see through that charade on that "official" web page linked above.

How much surplus wealth can all the people in America produce?

Where does all the surplus wealth produced by all the people who produce surplus wealth in America go?

What is that number?

The total amount of surplus wealth produced by all the people in America who produce surplus wealth is x.

What is x?

If you have a brain, us it, look at the Debt Clock, and answer the simple math question.

How much is x?

How much surplus wealth is created by all the people who create surplus wealth in America?

If you can get that far, if you can get at least a shadow of an understanding of the answer to the question asked, then you can be in a position to know the ugly truth, and you can be in a position to shed the shackles of falsehood, the same dire misery facilitated through the dissemination of lies such as the lies being broadcast in this Real News report.

To be specific:

Well, in truth, the government--the deficit that the federal government has been running in the United States is pretty much entirely the product of three things.

Lie one:

One of them is our continued expenditures on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Who is this person speaking for, and about? Who does this person think we are - who is within the set of "our" people? Who ordered the invasion of Iraq and Afghanistan? Who profits by those expenditures? Who pays the bill, who pays the costs of those investments?

The people who create surplus wealth are not stupid, the people who create surplus wealth are not criminals, and the people who create surplus wealth are not stupid enough to spend their hard earned power to purchase, waste it, on aggressive wars for profit, where the investments will become negative numbers, and the only ones who can, remotely, skim off the top of the product of those wars, the actual goal behind the order to go to war, are the very, very, very, few people, and the same few people, who get the gravy, the profits, the goal, the gold ring, the power to move the oil, or not move the oil (to keep prices high), and these few people are the very same ones who order the war into being, the same one's who profit, the same one's who make it happen, a very short list. The one's who pay the price, the long list, are the victims. Just follow the money, if you are interested.

A. Surplus wealth = x
B. Expense of 2 aggressive wars for profit = y
C. Total net gain after expenses flows to whom?

X - Y = -Z

The supply of surplus wealth is spent on sending money to the enemies of "our" enemies, literally financing both sides, and the net result of that investment is millions of dead innocent victims, and thousands upon thousands of tortured and murdered American service men and women, men and women who are fooled into thinking they are serving their country, when in fact they are serving legal criminals who use surplus wealth to conduct aggressive wars for profit, and rake in the cash, as their cronies send the bills, to be paid or else, to Uncle Sam.

The people who create surplus wealth would not look at the "investment" of an aggressive war for profit, on the table, in the discussion room, the discussion room where the "investment" is proposed, and add up the numbers, and advocate, and finance, and expend all the costs, so as to increase the supply of surplus wealth by that "investment", that abomination, that legal crime, that, or those 2, aggressive wars for profit. It does not add up without fraud, it does not add up without lies, and it does not add up unless a very few people skim off the top of the business venture in progress, no bid contract, no competition whatsoever, prices jacked up to the roof, low quality, or no quality, salaries raised to the moon, and the scum of the earth cash in, fold their hand in it, at just the right time, every time, and give the bill to the people who create wealth, the only one's who can pay the bill, and demand payment - or else.

Who is stupid here - come on people?

The ones who profit from those aggressive wars for profit, do. They cash in. Finding them is easy. The money trail leads right to them.

Finding the victims is as easy. The bill is paid by the victims. Why is this hard to know?

This is as easy as apple pie. What has happened to us, to you? Look in the damn mirror.

Lie #2:

The second is the Bush tax cuts, particularly tax cuts for the wealthy that you were mentioning.

There is, has been, and always will be, a perfectly reasonable explanation as to why someone blames everyone for the deeds of a few people. The few guilty people are thereby seen as less evil, less bad, as the few guilty people are falsely associated with the non-guilty people, and to add insult to injury, the innocent people are made to share in the guilt, by that false, close, proximity to the guilty.

How convenient can falsehood be for the criminals?

How destructive can falsehood be for the victims?

A. Guilty people are guilty as sin.
B. Innocent people are not guilty - by definition

C. A person willfully produces a report whereby the person knows, beyond a shadow of doubt, that one set of people, a list of actual names of people, are guilty, and no one other than those people are guilty, and the report blames a larger set of people, including innocent people, for the crimes committed by the guilty people.

The report, willfully produced by C, now causes this:

A. Guilty people are now perceivable as being less guilty (if you fall for this con game) as this group of guilty people are placed in the same group as the innocent people.

B. Innocent people are now seen as being guilty, as innocent people are falsely, and closely, association with the guilty people.

The guilty are aided in that manner, and they are now  more able to perpetuate their victimization upon their targeted victims.

It is an old gag, the criminal shouts "thief" during the crime and the criminal points at innocent people. It works, all to well. It only works on people who don't know how the crime works.

The innocent are injured in that manner, and they are now less able to avoid victimization.

How bad can it get?

This bad


It can get:

Worse

Lie #3

And the third is the effects of the economic crisis itself, the loss of revenue due to mass unemployment and the increase in expenditures due to things like unemployment benefits and health care for the unemployed.

If surplus wealth is extreme, beyond the imagination of most people, then a whole lot of people don't need to work including but not limited to:

1. Children
2. Old people
3. Sick people
4. Politicians
5. Soldiers
6. Police officers
7. Lawyers.
8. Judges
9. Jurors
10. Criminals
11. Legal criminals

If surplus wealth is extreme, many, many, many, many people can kill each other in aggressive wars for profit, and there are still many, many, many, people able to survive and live a good life. Wars waste a whole lot of the power that could have been used to make even more surplus wealth, so why, and use your own brain, and use math, is there not enough surplus wealth to lower the cost of living, for those who actually create wealth?

There is, and has been, so much surplus wealth available, so very much in fact, that wars can be fought, burning up unimaginable amounts of surplus wealth, and still the average standard of living increases for the average human being. Take one minute to contemplate what would be done with all that wasted surplus wealth had it not been spent in the work of making a very, very, very, very few people "supper" wealthy?

Can you add?

What do you see when you see this:

Someone get's this much

Are you brainwashed into only seeing half the truth?

The choice to be a criminal, or be a legal criminal, is a choice to do what with the total supply of surplus wealth?

Simple answer: Steal it.

Is that choice an investment? Who pays the bill of that investment? How can a legal criminal manage to convince his mark, his targeted market, to pay the bill?

You don't know? Why not? How does that ignorance you have work for you?

Could the reasoning for your lack of understanding be a lifetime of exposure to lies?

Do you believe in lies?

I am going to restart the Real News report, the one that regurgitates some very destructive lies.

If in fact these aren't his policy objectives. Like, I'm--well, giving my personal opinion here--I'm not so persuaded that he's so committed to those policy objectives. He seems to give up on some of these policy objectives rather easily.

Paul Jay, to me, knows what is going on, and he appears to be doing as much as he can to call for a Reality Check on these lies that are pouring out of this "expert" or this "authority" on economy.

If the president has the power to start, or continue, three, or more, wars by "executive order" then the president can do anything to anyone whenever he wants, and that has to be a lot of power.

Use your brain here people. If you can spend as much money as you want, whenever you want, then you have the legal license taken by the people running, and perpetuating The Federal Reserve; but if you have the power commanded by The President of U.S.A. Inc. LLC, you can threaten anyone, anywhere, with torture, and murder, you can send whole families, whole cities, to hell on earth, and after reading that you may jerk your knee, and you may disbelieve these facts, you may want to remain stupefied, and that power to stupefy you may win that battle, again.

I suffered through to the end of that report and I can say that this report offers, by example, a clear message. If honest working people want a real union they can watch this report and know that joining the AFC-CIO is a very poor investment, the "leadership" has been corrupted - a very familiar story.