View single post by Joe Kelley
 Posted: Sat Jul 17th, 2010 09:18 am
PM Quote Reply Full Topic
Joe Kelley

 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article25955.htm

 

That is connected to this:

 

http://www.outpost-of-freedom.com/jimbellap.htm

 

How?

 

Listen to the first link and learn how power works.

Note: "Wheat Futures"

Accumulate huge piles of cash.

Buy huge piles of long futures.

"And this accumulation created a very odd phenomenon in the market. It’s called a "demand shock." Usually prices go up because supply is low, right? That’s the idea. There’s not a lot of supply, so the price goes up. In this case, Goldman and the other banks had introduced this completely unnatural and artificial demand to buy wheat, and that then set the price up. Now, a lot of people are saying, "Oh, it was biofuel production. It was drought in
Australia. It was floods in Kazakhstan." Let me tell you, hard red wheat generally trades between $3 and $6 per sixty-pound bushel. It went up to $12, then $15, then $18. Then it broke $20. And on February 25th, 2008, hard red spring futures settled at $25 per bushel. This is completely beyond the pale, particularly at a— "

 

The perception of scarcity (real or not) increases the price. People, actual people, not "Wall Street", but actual people cause an increase in the price of something because they buy a lot of it and control it and keep it and cause scarcity and cause the price to go up and cause more power to flow from their victims to them.

Call it leverage, or replication, or whatever word describes the intricate details of how the crime is perpetrated, and it remains a crime, and the fact that it is a crime is perceptually less severe, the criminals are clever, innovative, etc.

People use power (piles of money, and they can merely add zeros to their bank accounts whenever they want more purchasing power) to gain more power, at the expense of their innocent victims.

These people who use their power are called "Wall Street". They are people. No one has a name for them, not in that Media stream - not in that link - just Wall Street.

Wall Street does this, and Wall Street does that, and no names.

Futures are claims, tickets, or debts, promises to pay, as well as ownership notes, and in practice it is the large number of these units that cause other people to act in specific ways. A huge number of these "futures" purchased cause other people to act in a different way than a small number of these "futures" purchased.

That is a general but factual description of how the crime is committed.

The media outlet claims that Wall Street is only interested in using money to gain more money. How can that be? Wall Street can add zeros to their accounts at will, whenever they want more money they can simply add zeros, if Wall Street includes The Federal Reserve - and failing to know if The Federal Reserve is connected to Wall Street is a huge failure.

Wall Street is connected to The Federal Reserve, and the paper trail proves it, the connection is the dollar unit of legal money. Where does Wall Street go when Wall Street "borrows" money? Who loans Wall Street more money? How much does the lender charge Wall Street for a loan of more money? Where does The Federal Reserve go when it needs more money to loan to Wall Street?

Wall Street isn't interested in more money. People desire more power, and then people (Wall Street people) use power to gain more power. If people have enough power, then people can use that power to starve millions. Starving people are people who have less power. Starving people are people who will pay more, and more, and more, and more of their remaining power to get food, so that starving people don't become dead people.

People act differently when they are starving. Do you think, even for a minute, that Wall Street doesn't know this fact?

The purchase of "futures" sets about a chain reaction whereby other people act in different ways compared to a process of life whereby the "futures" were not purchased.

A. Life goes on as usual (Wheat prices at $3 per bushel.

B. The decision to buy "futures" causes the price to go up to $20

Futures purchases cause life to change. A big purchase of futures causes life to change in a big way. Power, including food power, flows one way when "futures" are not purchased. Power, including food power, flows another way when "futures" are purchased.

The solution proposed in the media link was to control the flow of Wheat production so as to avoid the starvation of millions - because Wheat production was controlled in such a way as to cause the starvation of millions.

Is that true or not true?

Now moving onto the second link, involving another type of "Futures" market:


 
Suppose a name was published on many media sources and the name for this person is John Doe Wall Street. John has a home in New York
, and a phone number, perhaps John has a Facebook page too.

Now suppose that John Doe Wall Street confessed, openly, to having ordered the purchase of all those futures that lead to all that starvation.

Now there is a name of a real person, public knowledge, and this person knowingly, willfully, and proudly caused the starvation of millions so as to gain more power by that willful act. Again, John Doe Wall Street doesn't do this for money, since John Doe Wall Street
can add as many zeros to his account whenever he wants, he just calls up The Fed, and more zeros are added to his account. John Doe Wall Street does this act so as to lessen the power of many of his potential rivals, as the power game goes, this is what the game is, and John Doe Wall Street confesses openly for all to see.

That won't happen, not often, and not "under oath", but suppose it did, so as to connect the first link to the second link.

Now suppose that you and I, and everyone else on the planet has a new power given to us, or a new power that we take for ourselves as we decide to buy futures concerning John Doe Wall Street.

This power we have, I must say, will be as criminal in principle as the power given to, or taken by, John Doe Wall Street.

John Doe Wall Street takes the power to buy futures and then John Doe Wall Street
 uses that power to do things - such as starve millions of people.

You and I, and millions of people, take the power of futures and we use that power to do things, things we want done – for some reason.

The reader has to read the link.

This link:

http://www.outpost-of-freedom.com/jimbellap.htm

If many people buy a ticket, a debt note, a future, and these notes are claims held by the owners, whereby the death of John Doe Wall Street will cause a lot of power to move to one person from many people, then such a process is the same type of crime as the one ordered into existence by John Doe Wall Street.

The accumulation of a huge pile of money into one account can cause people to act differently if people can do things that cause that huge pile of money to be their own account, their money, and their power to purchase just about anything, when the pile of money is really huge.

How much power does the person have, the one person, who is in charge of The Federal Reserve when he (or she) can merely add zeros to his (or her) legal dollar account?

Armed with an infinite number of dollars, what other power can such a person gain when that huge pile of money is employed in the work of gaining more power from other people?