 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Considered to be censored data
The main failing with professional (and amateur) critics is that that particular vocation does not involve helping people and getting things done. It just involves tearing down things that might help, and stopping others from breaking free of Big Brother’s clutches-an occupational calling/hobby with a marginal sanity index. When you com across someone who is preoccupied with stopping this progress and saying how bad it all is, realize that the critic is a “company man,” obsessed with infecting all with the venom of statism, and does not have your best interests at heart-and likely never will. An honorable critic would bring forth another solution, i.e. another remedy for the situation at hand, rather than just sounding the general hue and cry and proclaiming that all (sheep) should stand stockstill and accept their fate as “part of life.”