| View single post by Joe Kelley | |||||||||||||
| Posted: Thu Nov 5th, 2009 10:24 am |
|
||||||||||||
Joe Kelley
|
Michael Delavar, You prefer to add this unpleasant chore to the list of things you are doing these days? How does that work? Reading this forum, then reading this topic, you find cause to offer corrective text aimed at someone who needs it, this seems to be a possible scenario, and you avoid mentioning any language that directly challenges someone who writes this: So, I think I get it, the person who associates a fellow forum member with the word "insane" is not worthy of direct moderation while the person targeted by that association with the word "insane" is worthy of direct corrective moderation by you. The topic is not worth discussing to this forum membership. That much is clear. The moderators, such as they are, have spoken.
In parting, you can have your forum, for all it is worth to you, my point will remain here, in this text, for as long as the moderators allow. Accurate currency is unwelcome here, what is welcome, what is rewarded, is libel. It is not worth continued libel, having my viewpoint twisted around, misrepresented, and on top of that having my efforts to defend against that libel moderated while the libeler is given a free hand in this market of ideas. Libel wins here at your request. Have fun doing whatever it is you are doing here, I see no point in it, not without accurate currency. I can leave with an open question. What is so attractive about falsehood, here in the form of libel, that you find it in need of so much dedicated support?
|
||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||