 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
In that link are words intending to explain current realities and possible future realities associated with the force of defense against criminal governments diverted from a conflict dictated by the aggressors to a defense invented by the defenders.
In other words the control over the nature of the battle is seized by the defenders of liberty and forced into being strictly defensive as the defenders avoid contact with the aggressors on all possible fronts.
That is the opposite of the battle cry that goes like this: "If you can't beat em': Join em'".
The idea in the link is to avoid all contact with the aggressors by nurturing contact among the defenders of liberty, to build stronger voluntary associations as a means of avoiding involuntary associations.
The problem with the idea in the link is a question of efficiency, not principle. The principle behind the idea is not only workable, it ensures the preservation of liberty; however, the road is long and the power gained on that road is comparatively less than the power that could be gained on a more efficient road.
The plan is to encourage and then employ an increase in the volume of barter trade, and by that enterprise the involuntary tax man is avoided, less power is sent to the aggressors and more power is left in the control of the defenders. This is a solution to the problem that was so well described by Thomas Paine in his work titled: Common Sense.
The problem can be seen as this:
The problem stated above can be remedied, obviously, by slowing down and then reversing the furnishing of the means by which we suffer and turning that flow of power into the means by which we prosper - in liberty.
Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer.
The casual reader may gloss over the link and my report on the link and be inspired to write off the effort as impractical or even insignificant, to which my own experience suggests otherwise. At least the effort is affecting remedy concerning the specific problem defined so well by Paine. My only critique concerns, again, the measure of efficiency, which can be measured as power flowing from Bank account A to the various bank accounts that were previously raided by the aggressors through the various means that they manage to achieve that end - including involuntary taxations such as "inflation" and "income tax".
It makes sense to me, perhaps not so common of sense, that those who "voluntarily" give up their power to the legal criminals are not likely to invent any method by which a remedy could be put into good use, so much as they would be very inventive of ways to apologize for the torturing and the mass murdering done by their co-conspirators; the same people who cause the rest of us to suffer. There you have a specific demarcation.
- Those who apologize for and voluntarily empower the torturing mass murderers.
- The victims
Here is one measure:
http://www.brillig.com/debt_clock/faq.html
Perhaps the meter broke from spinning around too fast?