View single post by Joe Kelley
 Posted: Mon May 25th, 2009 06:46 pm
PM Quote Reply Full Topic
Joe Kelley

 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
Here is a link:

http://www.notmygovernment.us/cgi-bin/forum/YaBB.pl

I've been banned from that forum for asking questions.

The following is the e-mail cut and pasted where the "moderator" dictated my censor from that public forum:

 


Greetings :

 

The People's Awareness Coalition has been around for 10 years.

The nature of its mission is grounded in taking baby steps into correcting America's problems.

There is no doubt that there are larger issues, but this path for PAC has been set by consensus.

 

As it appears you have your own agenda and will disrupt our schedule of education.

Moreover, to do an analysis as seen below without reading the whole book is reckless.

 

For these reasons you may no longer post/be a member on the forum

 

We suggest that you start your own group with your political ideas.

 

Thank you for your time,

 

LB Bork ~ PAC  Founder



 

 
In reading the Red Amendment document I encounter a few problems.

1.      No mention of the coup executed by the “Nationalists” as those legal criminals usurped The People’s liberty with their fraudulent “Constitution”.
2.      Not recognizing problem 1 above leads to problem 2 where the original causes for the loss of liberty are ignored and symptoms are viewed as causes: such as the “sporting events” symptom.
3.      Not having recognized the problem 1 above leads to misunderstanding concerning how The Constitution is employed so as to commit legal crimes such as the first misuse of a “Standing Army” when Washington conscripted the army to suppress the Whiskey rebellion. This is not nit-picky stuff, since an error of this magnitude ignores the actual cause of problems since that usurpation of liberty. In the days after that usurpation of liberty (The Constitution) there were many people who spoke out about that usurpation of liberty, the cause, the inevitable result of that usurpation of liberty (The Constitution) and how The Constitution was employed as a means to that specific end (usurpation of liberty).
4.      The beginning of the crime of extortion, where the legal criminals siphon off economic power from the innocent victims who create that power, in America, started well before the Fourteenth Amendment, that legalized extortion racket started, again, with the usurpation of Liberty by the legal criminals who constructed and continue to maintain The Constitution (a usurpation of liberty by legal criminals in written form).
5.      COMMUNISM has as many meanings as there are minutes in the day, so blaming anything on COMMUNISM could, at least, be more specific and less ambiguous, in defining exactly what is meant by COMMUNISM

That is just a start concerning how I feel about the Red Amendment. Why is so much focus being expended on one written text? I fail to see the relative significance of the Fourteenth amendment when comparing it to The Constitution when considering which document clearly is the greater in significance on that paper trail.

So that is my question:

Why is so much focus being expended on one written text?

In this context:

I fail to see the relative significance of the Fourteenth amendment when comparing it to The Constitution when considering which document clearly is the greater in significance on that paper trail, as liberty was and continues to be destroyed by legal criminals, on purpose, for profit, at the expense of their innocent victims.
 
http://www.pacinlaw.org ~ http://www.pacgroups.us
Multi multa, non omnia novit = Many men know many things, no one knows everything.
The De jure Political Group: http://www.statenationals.net
Do you have concerns about America? http://www.redamendment.net
Got issues with the government? http://www.notmygovernment.us
Have you been Deprogrammed? http://www.deprogram.us

 

I have copies of other posts sent to that forum where no offensive language or spam was uploaded to that "private" site.

What do dictators do when faced with challenges to their authority?