View single post by Joe Kelley
 Posted: Sat Sep 20th, 2008 11:29 am
PM Quote Reply Full Topic
Joe Kelley

 

Joined: Mon Nov 21st, 2005
Location: California USA
Posts: 6399
Status: 
Offline
Mana: 
http://mises.org/story/3060

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jipp_curve

I paid to attend a Financial Markets Conference in Las Vegas in 2005, at The Venetian Hotel, and my main interest and questions concerned this subject and the power of connectivity. Those people then refused to answer my questions. Their answer then was “If you can’t beat me’, join em’.”

Now they publish these observations of fact. Connectivity can be seen as the path of least resistance in an electric circuit. As soon as someone (like the Austrian legal criminals with their capitalist legal crimes) endeavors to block the free flow of currency the power pushing that currency goes around the blockage and finds a new path of connectivity.

The Mises Institute people are infected by a bunch of crooks. They prey upon the weak, and they spread disinformation as a means of profit, at the expense of their powerless victims. Fortunately those lying legal criminals will eventually be consumed by their own crimes and free flowing power, to all, will gain market share.   

I saw the path of least resistance, where power flows to everyone and no one is censored, blocked, or excluded by legal criminals and their power to eliminate competition back before 2005. One very good explanation of how that path of least resistance gains market share exponentially is found in something called The Prisoner’s Dilemma.

 

Look here: 

http://prisonersdilemma.groenefee.nl/ 

I have to use Mozilla Firefox to enable the Applet on that page. Work with the Applet and see how the forces of despotism (crime) work against the forces of cooperation (the path of least resistance). Once the balance of power tips in favor of cooperators, the result is the practical elimination of crime. 

The balance of power can tip the opposite way too, and for that to be understood clearly my suggestion to the reader is a study of the words written by Alexandr I Solzhenitsyn.  

Here is one of his messages: 

http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/literature/laureates/1970/solzhenitsyn-lecture.html
 

And on top of this we are threatened by destruction in the fact that the physically compressed, strained world is not allowed to blend spiritually; the molecules of knowledge and sympathy are not allowed to jump over from one half to the other. This presents a rampant danger: THE SUPPRESSION OF INFORMATION between the parts of the planet. Contemporary science knows that suppression of information leads to entropy and total destruction. Suppression of information renders international signatures and agreements illusory; within a muffled zone it costs nothing to reinterpret any agreement, even simpler - to forget it, as though it had never really existed. (Orwell understood this supremely.) A muffled zone is, as it were, populated not by inhabitants of the Earth, but by an expeditionary corps from Mars; the people know nothing intelligent about the rest of the Earth and are prepared to go and trample it down in the holy conviction that they come as "liberators".


I realize the possibility that the reader may not understand what I am going on about with the Austrian Economists; therefore I can explain. 

The Austrian Economists have two faces. One face is the face that blames all the bad things that happen in the world on The Socialists. That same face praises The Capitalists. The other face perpetrates all the bad things done by The Socialists. Here is a prime example. The finger is being pointed toward all the bad things done to suppress the free flow of information. In this case the culprit is The Dictator.  

The Dictator suppresses information. 

Look here: 

http://www.austrianforum.com/index.php?showforum=12
 

Once upon a time I had permission to post information on that public access forum, then my voice was censored by those dictators. 

The odd thing (that I cannot explain and that I cannot gain access to find the answer from the people who perpetrate this form of censorship) is the fact that my work remains published, on that site.  

Here is an example of my work: 

http://www.austrianforum.com/index.php?showtopic=253 

That is the work that led to Joe’s Law.

Here is more: 

http://www.austrianforum.com/index.php?showtopic=364 

In that thread the personal attacks become obvious.
 

I just wanted to point out that your diagrams, taken together, form some sort of abstract hellscape that doesn't really communicate much other than a sense of panic and chaos among stick figures. It's like an impressionist's take on economics. Reading things like "Money is energy" indicates that your "gift" extends beyond MS-Paint, but honestly there's only so much of this a person can take without the assistance of narcotics.

Keep on having fun, doing whatever the hell it is you're doing here.


Here is where the hammer fell down upon me (The Iron Fist): 

http://www.austrianforum.com/index.php?showtopic=1057 

In that thread my effort was to communicate with another forum member. The moderators stepped in. I don’t think it is a coincidence that, at that time, I was also posting links to expose the crimes of 911 where the U.S. government legal criminals murdered thousands of people in New York City on September 11, 2001. 

The personal attacks began with this:
 

The link is to a kook site which, among other things, advocates the elimination of interest rates. Care to comment more fully on your intent in posting the link, and your thoughts on the content of that site?

I did care to expand upon the accurate observations of how “interest” is, in fact, a flow of power from those who produce power to those who steal it by fraud or violence, or “interest” is merely a cost paid by a high risk borrower to an insurance fund. I had much to say on that subject, and I still do. 

The dictator voice becomes ever louder during the process by which the dictator censors the unwelcome information. 

Here:
 

That was not an attack: it was an order. As a mod, I'm one of the persons you implicitly accused of wishing to censor or silence you. If you blather enough about how "the mods will probably lock the thread and shut me up, etc., etc.," then a mod--possibly I--will indeed take some sort of action. Thus you are encouraged to stow it.

Here: 

Let me say this plainly, so as to leave no doubt. Never ask that question again. Completely and utterly drop that subject. If you have something to say about economics, say it. Clear?

Soon after that exchange my I.P. address was blocked to that site. 

How are those two faced dictators any different than the situation they publish concerning China and the leaders in China endeavoring to censor unwelcome information? 

The answer is clear, very clear, there is no difference in principle, the difference is a matter of degree.

 

Last edited on Sat Sep 20th, 2008 12:03 pm by Joe Kelley