 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Last week, during a brief digression in the ongoing efforts to socialize the losses suffered by the super-rich kleptocrats at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, Congress conducted an authentic Orwellian hate-fest directed at "super-rich" people who had earned their money through legitimate enterprise.
Please note how these supposed free market proponents are so quick to apply the political means of fraud when they point fingers at the bad guys and support the good guys. There isn’t any room for doubt. “Socialism” is bad. “Capitalism” is good.
By that demonization the entire populations of people who support social structures are condemned as bad, while conveniently the entire populations of people who support capital structures are good.
Here is where the dogmatists confess their duplicity. If the free market did factor into this free competition between social and capital structures the winner would earn its place. Where is this free market?
Here:
Orwellian hate-fest directed at "super-rich" people who had earned their money through legitimate enterprise.
Where is an example of one of these "super-rich" people who had earned their money through legitmate enterprise?
I'm going to link 25 examples of something.
The 25 Most Vicious Iraq War Profiteers
When speaking about criminals and their crimes, it seems to me, it is a good idea to follow the paper trail to the people who benefit most from those crimes if the idea is to account for the actual people who plan on and then execute crimes.
Why call "them" socialists?
What is the point if not to collectively punish innocent people for the planned actions of a few very powerful people? How do these people actual gain so much power in the first place?
Why not ask legitimate questions and seek accurate answers? Why blame “socialism” for the actions of people who plan on and execute robbery, torture, and mass murder for profit?
Why label the criminals with any label other than criminals?
If “capitalism” is so much more superior to “socialism”, then why plan on and execute fraud and violence in the effort to exclude social structures?
The real competition being demonized, tortured, and murdered may be Islamic Finance. Islamic Finance threatens The Dollar Hegemony with products that offer higher quality for lower cost.
Islamic Finance offers accountability as a quality. Islamic Finance offers no-interest costs to consumers. Is that the real enemy or not?
Why ignore the real competition? Why point fingers at phantoms?
Russian, China, Venezuela, and Iran are places were people live. Why blame them for failures in market experiments by labeling them with the bogus term “socialist” as if “capitalists” have a patent or copyright on the “Free Market” of social structures.
The answer is a confession; that is why the answer will never materialize from the mouths of capitalists.
The following is worth reading:
http://www.financialsense.com/fsu/editorials/dorsch/2007/0501.html
The “Axis of Oil” led by Russia, Iran, and Venezuela, is slowly chipping away at the US dollar’s status as the world’s “reserve currency.”
Are the "socialists" becoming "capitalists" or are these terms meaningless beyond dogmatic politicization?
Last edited on Wed Jul 23rd, 2008 03:02 pm by Joe Kelley