 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
http://www.wfmu.org/messageboard/yabb/YaBB.cgi?board=Off-Topic;action=display;num=1153925023
First Link:
Dave Emory audio recording of radio broadcasts.
Look for and listen to:
July 25, 2006: FTR #561: Economics 9-11 Part 2
Second link:
WFMU Message board (forum) my post:
Does anyone question Dave Emory?
Specific contradiction:
"Controlled Demolition" of the 3 world trade center buildings - True or False?
If false, then, what caused the destruction of the word trade center buildings? I'm having a hard time swallowing the official explanation i.e. Jet fuel fire melting steel (particularly contradictory concerning building 7).
http://www.911busters.com/911_new_video_productions/
Third link:
A few presentations concerning the contradictions between the official explanation and the available evidence.
What caused the destruction of the World Trade Center buildings?
Also:
Dave Emory explains Macroeconomics.
In short:
War is used to reduce the flow of oil to create scarcity which, in turn, causes higher prices of everything requiring oil which, in turn, causes a flow of wealth from the many to a few.
My question:
Where does China and alternate energy fit into this Dooms Day scenario?