 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
A Note to Principled Anarchists
That is nice.
I will try to contact the person through e-mail.
My e-mail will be very brief. Comments are here.
I am running for president and I consider myself to be a principled anarchist. I vote for myself - when able.
The problem I continue to have with Ron Paul (and so far there is only one problem) is the failure to support the rule of law with respect to the constitutional method of enforcing the rule of law.
It goes like this:
A band of torturing mass murderers happens to be torturing and mass murdering.
The leader of the group may not be known; however - one of the leaders has documented his participation - on the record and off. That person's name is Dick.
Dick has put the Dick back in Dictator.
What can be done to slow down the torture and mass murder; if not stop it.
What can be done according to the rule of law or if that is forgotten, then, what can be done according to the constitution?
Someone happened to ask and answer that question and currently that effort is underway. Congressmen and women must support the effort or the effort goes unsupported, see, can you see this as fact?
Without the support, supporting the fabricated rule of law emboldened into the constitution, the torture now continues, the torture in the next minute will continue, and the torture tomorrow and on into the foreseeable future continues - so help their God.
It does.
Why not support the constitution on this matter?
Well...Ron?
Are you lost?
Here:
http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-hr333/show
SponsorCo-Sponsors
- Rep. Tammy Baldwin [D, WI-2]
- Rep. Robert Brady [D, PA-1]
- Rep. Yvette Clarke [D, NY-11]
- Rep. William Clay [D, MO-1]
- Rep. Steve Cohen [D, TN-9]
- Rep. Danny Davis [D, IL-7]
- Rep. Keith Ellison [D, MN-5]
- Rep. Sam Farr [D, CA-17]
- Rep. Bob Filner [D, CA-51]
- Rep. Raul Grijalva [D, AZ-7]
- Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee [D, TX-18]
- Rep. Henry Johnson [D, GA-4]
- Rep. Carolyn Kilpatrick [D, MI-13]
- Rep. Barbara Lee [D, CA-9]
- Rep. James McDermott [D, WA-7]
- Rep. James Moran [D, VA-8]
- Rep. Donald Payne [D, NJ-10]
- Rep. Janice Schakowsky [D, IL-9]
- Rep. Edolphus Towns [D, NY-10]
- Rep. Maxine Waters [D, CA-35]
- Rep. Diane Watson [D, CA-33]
- Rep. Lynn Woolsey [D, CA-6]
- Rep. Albert Wynn [D, MD-4]
Business as usual even before the champion of the constitution can champion the constitution while standing as president. Is he not a congressman?
How about some more help with the economics of the issue?
Scoffing at the argument that has been made by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and others in the Democratic leadership that impeachment might hurt Democratic chances in the November ’08 elections, or that it could deter Democrats from their Congressional agenda, Wexler, a six-term congressman seeking re-election, says, “I believe that there is a constitutional obligation for the Congress to hold this administration accountable, and it should not depend on what people think the impact might be on an election. The only question should be: Did Vice President Cheney abuse his powers?”
If it isn't good for the goose - huh?
Last edited on Thu Dec 20th, 2007 03:16 pm by Joe Kelley