 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Oyate,
In simple terms:
A corporation is a legal entity. The corporation can do two things:
Limit the liabilities of specific people.
Identify specific people who are responsible for the corporation.
If the former is the purpose of the corporation, then, law is crime.
If the later is the purpose of the corporation, then, law is just and just in proportion to how accurately the specific people are held accountable for their specific actions.
The reason for the term liabilities is to accurately identify responsibility. I, you, and everyone are responsible for what I, you, and everyone does, individually and this fact is irrefutable. If I, your, or anyone acts, then, the actor is responsible for the act, in other words, the actor is liable for his or her actions.
When law is perverted to arm a person with the power to avoid accountability for their acts, their own responsibilities, then, law is crime on just proportion to the failure of accurate accountability.
When law is perverted in a manner that arms everyone with the capacity to avoid accountability, then, how is this condition to be viewed?
Can I offer a term that may accurately describe the condition whereby everyone is armed with the capacity to avoid accountability?
I’ll call it organized crime.
There is a principle, a natural law if you prefer, that supports, or arms, organized crime.
What is it?
Can I offer a term that may describe the principle that arms organized crime?
Kill or be killed.
How about this:
Do unto others before they can do unto you.
Is that too complicated?
How about this:
Aggression
I think that there is an even simpler principle involved.
Falsehood
I’m going to cut this short if possible.
Consider a well lit room whereby all human begins are thrust into, born into, and that room is called reality.
Someone issues a blind fold.
Those who issue the blindfolds, the organized people, peak.
In other words; the corporate actors, the ones who create their own limited liabilities, pretend to be as blind as everyone else, yet, they are not blind.
While the majority of people are stumbling around, in the dark, the corporate agents are moving the tables and chairs around.
The corporate agents are god like. When they feel like it, when it serves their purpose, they can pull everyone’s blind fold off.
One such power, the power to remove the blind fold, is the power to take away the people’s currency.
The trick, from my perspective, is to get the people convinced, before taking the blind fold off, before taking away the people’s currency, the trick is to get the people convinced that the loss of currency is the blinded people’s fault.
The trick isn’t difficult to pull off because in fact the loss of currency is the blind people’s fault.
Such is the nature of falsehood.
Last edited on Mon Jul 3rd, 2006 02:52 pm by Joe Kelley