| View single post by Joe Kelley | |||||||||||||
| Posted: Sun Oct 28th, 2007 11:31 am |
|
||||||||||||
Joe Kelley
|
A news flash:
Source: http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=6688 Look up "Equitable Commerce" if any confusion exists concerning the news flash. The term "free" trade can be confused with 'free to impose obedience upon the innocent'. Equitable trade (or commerce) is a less ambiguous term - on purpose. A less powerful economic power may be more inclined to accurately identify inequity while the more powerful economic power may be inclined to ignore inequity, or, impose it by fraud or force. I don’t know the accurate translation of the term ‘equitable’ from English to Russian, Chinese, Venezuelan, Korean, Cuban, Iraqi, or Iranian language. I don’t think the term is synonymous with freedom, in any language; so much as the term is, as far as my understanding goes, with terms like Justice and Liberty. Like this: Equity = Justice = Liberty = credit Freedom = punishment = crime = debt Discussions on these issues (where people seek an equitable meaning for the terms used to convey an accurate perception) are rare, from my viewpoint, and argumentation on these issues (where people seek power over other people by fraud or force of intellect) is more common – less equitable. People may prefer to be told what to think and, in turn, to tell other people what to think – freely; as if the idea were to impose reality rather than understand it from as many diverse perspective as possible – like peer review – to gain a more accurate understanding – just in case the myopic viewpoint were false – even just a little bit false. Seeking agreement appears to be an equitable cause – if you know what I mean. If not, then, I can try to be more precise. The time is right.
|
||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||