 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Why not cut to the chase and just post the link to the Web site?
IntoTheBreech,
I did. If you did not understand how I did, in fact cut to the chase, then you fail to understand that I did cut to the chase. Why I did not link to the web site was explained while I cut to the chase with my first post. I was conducting a test. Your response is a response to my test. So far you accuse me of doing something wrong ‘not cutting to the chase’ and you presume something concerning my motive (as if I ‘should have’ directly linked to a web site) and your presumption is inaccurate. I didn’t link a web site because I didn’t want to link to a web site.
“Is there a particular reason you want folks to go through Google?
Yes. The test was similar to my personal discovery. Now I am asking other people to Google four specific words and I want to find out what they think about what they discover when they Google those four specific words.
I’ve discovered, so far, that anyone who Google’s these words will find the same results; however – that is a presumption on my part. So far my results are quite a bit less than conclusive.
“Possibly for data-mining reasons?”
That question is like a field full of explosive mines. Before I can answer that question with any confidence in supplying an accurate answer it is my request to get some measure of explanation of the term ‘data-mining’ as you understand that term to mean.
I can elaborate some on my motive for asking other people to perform my test. I have one computer on one desk and it is hooked up to RoadRunner. My son has another computer on the same desk and it is hooked up to Verizon. One network connection is cable and the other is ‘phone’ (coax and 3 wire). During my discovery of moving Google Search results to the first on the list on the first page I conducted a test to see if my ability to move a Google Search result to the first on the list on the first page worked on another computer besides my own computer. My thinking was to see if the results were Universal.
I’ve asked someone I know in Denmark and he found the same results. The evidence appears to support an accurate hypothesis.
The next step in the test may be to see if someone other than me can get a specific Google Search to move to the first position on the first page.
If you want to volunteer to try, then, please feel free.
“To be perfectly honest, the petition makes absolutely no sense.”
To be perfectly honest; the petition makes sense to me. If the petition makes no sense to you, then, do you really think that the petition is to blame for your lack of understanding? I am being as honest as possible.
“This could be the reason there are only 2 signatures, one being the sponsor of the petition.”
So…do you intend to insult the other person who signed the petition along with me or has your level of superiority above us lifted you from any such accountability?
Lysander Spooner wrote two of my favorite works:
An Essay on the Trial by Jury
An Essay on the Trial by Jury
A New System of Paper Currency
http://www.lysanderspooner.org/papercurrency.htm
In Trial by Jury Spooner reports how the sovereignty of free men as jurors checked the power of any supposed KING because any one person (not universal) could nullify any law made by anyone with his one vote. One Juror had veto power.
The King was also checked by a price upon his head, a fine, to be paid by the Kings killer for murdering the King. That was the punishment – a fine.
Have you ever read Jim Bell’s essay on Assassination Politics?
http://www.outpost-of-freedom.com/jimbellap.htm
Lysander Spooner’s Paper Currency System, if I may be so bold to say, was the plan that launched the modern evolved free market system (the voluntary one not the one enforced in parallel by organized crime). Rather than having to rely upon the cumbersome and often dangerous currency of Gold, rather than that, the commodity backed paper system, where land titles supplied the standard of value, such as Lysander suggested, has in fact worked out in modern times; even if the actual parallel circuit is not readily visible due to the interlacing of ‘legal’ impositions and distortions of that market.
Who owns the titles? Who pays the mortgage interest?
If organized crime (rouge state) backed out of the business and allowed competitors to compete, then, mortgage interest on property would reach for the cost of supplying the currency used in the housing market.
Please, anyone, read either The Essay on the Trial by Jury or The New System of Paper Currency and start a new thread on it. I’ll dive in that one.
This topic concerns a parallel viewpoint and one that is more up to date.
I can offer an example of where my perspective (new discovery) is focused (but by no means is this link going to explain the whole concept to any degree of detail – it is a piece of the puzzle):
http://business.iafrica.com/features/649690.htm
I can’t quote from that link in any way that makes sense. It is the entire concept, or viewpoint, from that link (like the entire concept of Spooner’s two works and Jim Bells or even Howard Bloom’s “Global Brain”) that fits into the viewpoint.
The viewpoint of which I speak is akin to an epiphany purchased from many years of searching.
It is almost like passing through a one way valve or door. At some point I now realize being in a new room and the door back to the old room is locked. During the passage through, as I noticed it occurring, I started writing. My writing has developed for many years. This may explain why some people find my writing incomprehensible. I can’t say. I do have a lot of experience with people telling me off and suggesting to me that ‘my’ writing makes no sense. That is odd from my view.
I don’t go around telling other people that their words make no sense. I say: I do not understand what you mean. Please explain.
See the difference?