 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
The above is a forum re-direction. My initial intent remains the same intent. I'm asking Alex Jones a question concerning a new Independence Day.
The way things work, or so the story goes, is a radio show where anyone can ask Alex Jones a question by phone or through the forum.
Two days in a row I asked my question during the broadcast.
The forum topic used for question asking is purged on a daily basis and that makes sense.
My question was redirected and that makes sense.
Why was my question rephrased in a way that discredits my question?
I'm going to cut and paste the entire exchange just in case the topic is deleted:
The moderators title choice is this:
More distracting ideas about how to spend our time
The moderator then republishes my question:
I don't want to spam.
How many times can I ask the question before the obvious answer is ignorance?
Why can't people plan on and execute a future new independence day. Following the example of many unrecognized patriots of true liberty the new Independence Day or ‘liberty day’ is a planned refusal to pay income tax (which empowers the legal criminals) and begin utilizing a replacement (competitive) currency?
During the time period between today and the new Independence Day signers pledge nothing more than their names and their intent to work toward the new Independence Day; which is not a promise to commit any crime AT ALL.
The idea is to voluntarily work toward no more income tax payments and the incorporation of a more accurate currency to have these goals achieved by a specific date.
The number of people signing the new Declaration of Independence can also be only a number with individual signers maintaining autonomy with an encryption; HOWEVER – what are we standing for – exactly. Is it liberty or something less?
The moderator republishes a response to my question (I didn't ask for a respose from anyone other than Alex Jones because I didn't want to spam). The response was first published during the live broadcast (or so the story goes).
I agree with that new Declaration of Independence. However, we also need to purify the Constitution and take out any unconstitutional amendments! And reinforce the Bill of Rights for all its worth! And eliminate the stupid Supreme Court decision that allows corporations to be considered an entity! That makes it to where they have no personal responsibility whatsoever!
That was a respone written live by someone called chilicharger665
Then the moderator adds:
Sometimes folks ignore... out of kindness... but since you persist...
Frankly... I think that the wisdom of the founders is being disregarded in your high tech idea... guess who owns all the encryption codes...
The purpose of this present effort is to use the power that is still there in the Constitution, and its Declaration, to remove the NWO's webs and tentacles from the still living organic Constitution and Charters of Freedom... a vampiric process which began in the mid 1860's... The goal is to reinstate the lawful government to this nation... By repeal, and sunset, and expungement as well...
As for you... The first thing you do is to grab your reader and brush up on what you would be so lightly casting aside... this may take some time since you obviously have a lot of catching up to do... Then, begin working hard to get Ron Paul elected... then finally... get back to me...
--Oldyoti
How is this different from the cops tasering the student asking a question in front of John Kerry?
Answer: It is different by degree. It is not different in principle.