 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
I've been down this road.
If the assumption is that I am asking questions because I have no clue as to what the answer might be, as if the last 20 years of my life has been a ride on a merry go round, then, I can see why people continually avoid answering my questions directly and prefer to simply direct me elsewhere.
I had this crazy notion that a person critical enough to publish commentary publicly would be willing to defend their viewpoints publicly.
No matter. I can continue doing what I have been doing and if you don't mind I may add a few more public access comments to this thread specific to my concerns and proposing to guess at what the current economic theorists may think about those specific items already started in this topic on this forum.
Such as:
What is the current and common principle utilized to determine cost or, from another angle, what exactly is it that is infecting the organism called humanity?
One must be economical. There is no alternative. Even if one chooses to avoid economic thought, then, that decision is an economical one, and one, that will accumulate costs.
All is economical as time goes by so the malignancy our species suffers is an economical disease and it is spread by economic professors. I have my own sources that confirm my own moral conscience on the principles involved in economic practice and promulgation.
The current Austrians exclude me.
Like this:
http://austrianforum.com/index.php?showtopic=737
Despite that continuing exclusion, and as I have already stated, I’ve read much of the past Austrian’s works and have found, digested, commented upon, and tried repeatedly to discuss, those works to no avail.
So my window of opportunity was short lived but rather enjoyable and as a bonus my World Record won’t gather too much notoriety.
Thanks again.