| View single post by Joe Kelley | |||||||||||||
| Posted: Fri May 19th, 2006 08:56 am |
|
||||||||||||
Joe Kelley
|
5:43 AM Challenge Sent http://www.sobran.com/columns/index.shtml The Reactionary Utopian Blaming Bush May 4, 2006
That is what I'm talking about! http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=lese 1 entry found for lese. lese \Lese\ (l[=e]z), v. t. To lose. [Obs.] --Chaucer. To lose. http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=majesty 2 entries found for majesty. ( P ) Pronunciation Key (m j![]() -st )n. pl. maj·es·ties
Once I looked the words up (words that mean one thing - obviously) and put the two together, then, the light shines. It was pretty dark before I looked up "lese". Looking words up isn't so bad. One finds one word that means one thing sometimes. That is practially unique these days. Soon 'we' may be redefining the word "The". "We" has already suffered enough - without mercy. That stinks.
|
||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||