 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
The new face of the freedom movement is Texas Congressman Ron Paul. The credit mostly goes to the Internet for having brought this principled politician into the light.
"The Internet" is a working example of anarchy. It is false to attribute human characteristics to "The Internet" as if "The Internet" can take or receive credit for something.
"The Internet" is a physical connection between human beings much like the air we breath is a physical connection between human beings. The human beings breathing the air and using "The Internet" can take and receive credit. The air keeps people alive. The Internet connects people and makes it possible to measure specific things about "The People".
Ron Paul has been around for many years. I know this to be true from my own experience. Way back before Waco and before Ross Perot I heard about Ron Paul during my investigations into human social networking (social science or social study).
Ron Paul was and remains an accurate voice among a torrent of lies; like a barely audible scream in the distance during a camp out in the forest at night.
If people move toward the truth, seeking accurate information, they will move closer to Ron Paul simply because all roads lead to the truth. This should be simple to understand and if it is not simple, then, you may be on a road that is going away or parallel to the road that originates from the truth.
One of my first encounters with that voice of reason passed on by Ron Paul occurred on a long forgotten link having possible connections with AM or FM radio, The John Birch Society, or possibly a minor media new paper or pamphlet. The message carried by that forgotten link escapes my specific memory; however - what is not forgotten is the contrast of Ron Paul’s message then and now. Then, as now, the message by Ron Paul is greatly contrasted by all the other messages, or noise, that proliferates in media of all kinds, again, the scream in the distance similar to a distant light in an otherwise pitch black night.
An example of the contrast then, as now, can be found in history since the same message continues now. Rather than spend too much time going back with specific precision in mind I'll simply try to remember my life and focus before Waco and Ross Perot. I remember joining the John Birch Society and reading many books on the subject of STATE CRIME. I use caps and those two words for a reason that was not reasonable to me way back then. I've since allowed my dues to lapse in the John Birch Society. At that time the supply of information exposing STATE CRIME was scarce and it took some effort to find it. While looking I came across more than one example of STATE CRIME documentary or commentary from the same source i.e. Ron Paul. Finding out, as time went by, that Ron Paul was, in fact, a Congressman created a very stark contrast itself. Here was a guy admitting to STATE CRIME while he held office in THE STATE. Most of the noise, the major media, the falsehoods, the confidence schemes, the false propaganda, the forest at night, and the darkness can be categorized as apologists for THE STATE and all the STATE CRIME that goes with it. Not Ron Paul. Not then. Not now.
If agents of THE STATE are committing crimes, then, Ron Paul makes no apology for it.
Chances are that my first exposures to Ron Paul's message, as they continue to be, were details concerning the questionable legitimacy of the Federal Reserve System of currency.
Back in the day, before Waco and Ross Perot, a person mentioning the possible illegitimacy of THE DOLLAR was automatically demonized as a Tin Hat Conspiracy Theorist; and these are just words.
Suffering through the onslaught cannot be explained with words. You must go through something similar to understand it. While fighting the unwanted excess baggage associated with 'going against the grain' the 'finding out' about another person who suffers the same, or more, is a reinforcement of legitimacy.
Picture this if you can. Out from the wilderness in the dark of night is a voice screaming liberty. You move toward that voice and that light and find a Doctor in Congress and the scream becomes a perfect harmony called Liberty the close you move in toward the source. Ron Paul isn't the source. He is merely standing closer to it.
What rubs off isn't generated by Ron Paul. Truth isn't credited to anyone in particular. Either you move closer to it or further away from it.
If you can catch up to Ron Paul, then, see if you can agree with me. I may be deluding myself. If so, then, my delusion has been going on for many years and my delusion is spreading. Many of the people connected by THE INTERNET are being infected with the same delusion. Perhaps it is like moths to a flame rather than concerned people seeking accurate facts going toward the truth.
My ability to know the difference remains a question to be answered even if the majority does not agree.
I can bank on Ron Paul seeing the same thing, not with words, simply seeing the same need for improvement toward more perfect information; reaching for truth and rejecting knowable falsehood.
How can anyone trust anyone else without a long time of reinforcing experience without any unresolved data refuting the focus and discipline toward truth and away from falsehood?
The gauntlet, the test, is not on the horizon. The test has already past and is passing now. It is the same test - one step after another step.
Which way is the right way?
We can all use some help. None of us require help taking a false step. Not even the worst of us.