Mike,

 

I didn’t check your forum. I read your e-mail and assumed that you didn’t post my reply.

 

Why continue using the e-mail form of currency when the forum form of currency is open and transparent?

 

That is a rhetorical question.

 

Like this one:

 

Why accuse me of not having the “Balls” to answer a question (among many) without identifying the question that you think I don’t have the “Balls” to answer?

 

That is another rhetorical question.

 

My question was and remains:

 

What is the form of currency utilized when the economy is mathematically perfected?

 

Your answer, if I can assume as much, is that the form of currency utilized when the economy is mathematically perfected is a ‘note’.

 

That is quite a huge step forward and what was the cost in getting there?

 

That last question is an accounting problem that can be solved with math.

 

I will continue to publish our e-mail exchange on a public forum. I will also check your forum to see if my reply sent to that forum was published. If my reply sent to your forum was published, then, I will try sending another reply to whatever was communicated on that forum.

 

Thanks for the concise and pertinent e-mail.

 

What can I say?

 

I assumed too much?