 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
______________________________________
OK, Joe. Certainly. More below.
Joe Kelley wrote:
My problem with those who have presented *their* energy currency viewpointS is that they do not agree. Particularly, their philosophy for regulating the circulation does not concur; and my problems with that are many. I therefore propose that we start by you proposing whatever ostensible agreement or disagreement is your viewpoint (which of course may or may not concur with other energy currency advocate viewpointS), and that we engage in a constructive exchange beginning there. Please note that I am really busy with other things for a week or so, and I don't have the immediate time to respond. So why don't you, in a few days or so, introduce a post to PFMPE at Google and we'll take it from there as time allows?
Mike,
With your permission I’d like to cut and paste our current exchange onto my web site for my own records and for anyone having an interest in human development from this viewpoint.
Please consider allowing others to read our exchange. Please let me cut and paste our current exchange onto my web site.
As far as I know, and I’ve been looking, I am the only person recognizing energy currency from a pecuniary viewpoint, so, your response to my e-mail is both enlightening and challenging form my viewpoint. I am anxious to find these people who also recognize energy currency from a pecuniary viewpoint. Please consider linking to me those people.
As to your offer to have me do something that you find to be cyclic in nature where conducive theory is hammered out conclusively and as a result you take down MPE forever: you may have me confused with your imagination.
MPE is a vital viewpoint aiding mankind in the effort to survive. It is a direct challenge to the economic falsehoods that infect global society destroying prosperity. What, on earth, makes you think that energy currency (and energy currency people) challenge MPE?
The two viewpoints compliment. They agree.
Regards,
mike
I’ll continue our exchange based upon your answer to my request to have our exchange published on my forum.
Please allow this to happen.
Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: mike montagne [mailto:mike.montagne@advanceis.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 8:15 AM
To: Josf
Subject: Re: Mathematically Perfected Economy
Hi Josf,
Over the years I've been round and round with the energy currency people. If you can do a responsible job of representing the subject I'd be glad to have you re-introduce it to the PEOPLE For Mathematically Perfected Economy at Google forum: http://groups.google.com/group/pfmpe/topics
The purpose of course would be to constructively hammer out conducive theory. I occasionally hear from the energy currency people, and we go through the same cycle over and over again. If we are going to do what best suits us of course, it would be a good idea to address the topics conclusively. Our discourse of course will not be personal; but if EC should prevail over MPE, I am willing to recognize that and take down MPE forever.
Warm regards,
mike
--------------------------------
Note: The cut and paste job didn't manage to convert intact.
My initial e-mail follows:
_________________________
Josf wrote:
Hi,
I found perfecteconomy.com awhile ago and have been linking to it
since.
Is anyone reading this (my post) familiar with Josiah Warren's cost
principle?
How about the following:
The Science of Society
Stephen Pearl Andrews
Equitable Commerce
Josiah Warren
A New Form of Paper Currency
Lysander Spooner
Mutual Banking
W.B. Greene
I am interested in discussion something I can "Energy Currency".
A principle:
The greater the supply of energy currency the greater will be the
purchasing power of that energy currency.
I can explain if you are interested.
________________________________
Last edited on Tue Jul 17th, 2007 01:52 pm by Joe Kelley