| View single post by Joe Kelley | |||||||||||||
| Posted: Sat Jul 14th, 2007 12:42 pm |
|
||||||||||||
Joe Kelley
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18011.htm Read that if you will - please. I googled People for Humanity: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=People+for+Humanity+ Personalized Results 1 - 10 of about 38,900,000 for People for Humanity Here are the first 3 links I found: http://emanzipationhumanum.de/english/human/israel.html http://www.imranidris.com/ http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendID=107231203 So...why not use my Google bumping tactic? Here: http://forum.atimes.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=10627 Here: http://www.anarchism.net/forum/board_entry.php?id=15384&category=0 and here: http://www.power-independence.com/new_topic.php?forum_id=4 Refresh Google: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=People+for+Humanity+ No change yet. I'll refresh later. Back to Cindy Sheehan: There must be an underlying shady reason that Speaker Pelosi took impeachment off the table. Her office stated the other day that she will not put the issue back on the table because she is focused on "ending the war." The statement would be laughable if it weren't for the fact that she is using a neo-con strategy of saying the exact opposite of what is true. Ms. Pelosi would not allow Rep. Barbara Lee's bill that truly supported the troops by fixing a quick timeline for their withdrawal to be brought to the floor and instead used her power to whip her caucus into approving a "non-binding" resolution that by its very name is meaningless and useless. The Dems can accomplish much if they put their muscle behind it and the Dems could impeach BushCo and end the war if that was truly their focus. Actions speak louder than words and one cannot say that she is focused on ending the war with her mouth while she is signing a $100 BILLION check to keep the war going with her signing hand.
|
||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||