| Moderated by: Joe Kelley | ||
| Author | Post | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe%27s_Law The following is Joe's Law published on Wikipedia (before it was deleted): +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ To the censors who rule over human language (you guys really think you have power?): Joe's Law already exists without the focus upon modern economic application. This fact should be very clearly illustrated by the last two references offered. I am confident that the censors will ignore the facts here and go about their book burning frenzy with pure glee. Do you guys rub your hands after pressing the delete key? Again – the second to last link on this page illustrates half of Joe’s Law as it exists as math. The math part of Joe’s Law is very well explained in those links, however the viewer of those links will be ‘educated’ with a very serious case of falsehood since that is ‘half’ of the truth. Joe’s Law combines both halves of these existing facts. If the viewer does not view the last link, and the viewer views only the second to last links (8 parts), the viewer may become depressed and be infected with a feeling of imminent doom concerning over-population, economic disaster, global warming, etc. and that would be a shame. On the other hand the viewer may skip the second to last link and the viewer may view only the last link where our human problems are solved easily with a few illustrations of applying economic investments into areas where productivity makes economic sense. That would be my preference for the reader of my work; however the reader would be missing the vital part contained in the second to last link (the 8 part video presentation) where exponential growth capability is explained. The combination of exponential growth toward producing more power (through investment) eliminates (or counters) any possible down-turn of economic prosperity including those desperate situations envisioned by people claiming that we human beings are heading towards Dooms Day, over-population, global warming, recession, depression, etc. Their solution will be to eliminate, or censor, some of us. Make my day. +++++++++++++++++++++++ Joe's Law: "Power produced into a state of oversupply reaches for zero cost as purchasing power increases because power lowers the cost of production." Joe's Law is an economic discovery concerning the relationship between supply, demand, price, cost, investment, and the production of power. Joe's Law was offically discovered on Wednesday, May 07, 2008 by Joseph Thomas Kelley. This web page is both a description and an example of Joe's Law. Joe's Law is a multi part economic law based upon the cost principle and the power principle. Joe's Law therefore has many parts. Part I of Joe's Law dictates: Power reproduces itself Power invested in the creation of power produces more power out of less power. Example: One oil well, gold mine, farm, Solar Panel, or Federal Reserve Bank (Communist State Bank) produced and running will produce enough power to re-produce another example of the original. At the time when the second oil well, gold mine, farm, Solar Panel, or Communist State Bank begins producing more power the total amount of power being produced will double. Part II of Joes Law dictates: Power produced into a condition or state of oversupply will push the price of power lower and therefore power reaching for over-supply will push the cost of power to zero. Example: How much does oxygen cost? Oxygen is power. Plants produce oxygen. How much do we, as human beings, pay the plants for oxygen? How much do the plants charge the humans for the consumption of oxygen? The opposite of Joe’s Law Part II can be seen as a General Strike conducted by the Union of Earth Plant life. How much will the plants on this planet charge the humans for oxygen if the plants of this earth go on strike and stop producing and re-producing oxygen? How much will you pay for your oxygen once the supply of oxygen reaches a state of scarcity, which is the opposite of a state of abundance? Oxygen is power. Part III of Joe’s Law dictates: When power is produced into a state of over-supply and the price of power reaches for zero there will be an increase in pecuniary (money) purchasing power since power reduces the cost of production. This part of Joe’s Law may be the most difficult part to comprehend for the human life forms on the planet earth. The plant forms probably know this law better at this time in human history. That does not bode well for the chances of human life’s survival when plants are smarter than human beings. The easiest way to understand how Joe’s Law works is to first view the opposite of Joe’s Law as the supply of Oil reaches a state of scarcity and therefore the cost of living rises in almost lock step or inverse proportion, where each increase in the price of oil corresponds with an increase in the price of everything. As the price of oil doubles the price of everything doubles. As the price of oil reduces the price of everything reduces. This relationship is a natural law (Joe’s Law) and this relationship does not require the understanding of the people who are affected by this natural economic law. Plants don’t care either. For all the plants care, like the amount that the humans care, life on earth will die off for lack of care concerning true economic laws. Joe’s Law in its complete form (to be perfected if possible) reads as follows (dictates): Power produced into a state of oversupply reaches for zero cost as purchasing power increases because power lowers the cost of production. Another part of Joe's Law has to do with the currency of language. This thread intends to move Joe's Law to the first page in a Google Search for "Joe's Law". At this time 5:02 am Thursday May 8, 2008 the Google Search Engine lists Joe's Law (as described here) in third place. Joe's Law also says that new language can be moved to the top spot on the Google Search Engine. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=No+More+Legal+Criminals http://forum.atimes.com/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=12812 http://www.restoretherepublic.com/component/option,com_fireboard/Itemid,27/func,view/catid,34/id,5808/#5808 http://www.anarchism.net/forum/board_entry.php?id=28223 http://www.groundreport.com/Media_and_Tech/Joes-Law This link is the offical discovery or IPO of Joe's Law. http://forum.freestateproject.org/index.php?topic=15178.0 The policy of this propaganda rag is uncompetitive and therefore this rag will eventually wither and die in the face of true competitive data transfer mediums. The following is one example of a source that proves the validity of Joe’s Law. I will quote a sentence from the source and link the source. "With oil trading above $100/barrel, a larger portion of our national wealth is being spent on the cost of energy." http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article19888.htm Joe's Law is an original discovery to which the network has already recorded the event. If, on the other hand, someone other than Joe will step forward with a record of having discovered the economic law at an earlier time then that fact will be known in time. Meanwhile this propaganda rag posing as a source of information can delete history as it is being produced. Step up the the plate people. This is fundamental research in the making right now in our time. Joe’s Law will not be linked in any book written by economic “professors” hired by powers that depend upon the scarcity of power. If the reader of this research does not understand Joe’s Law then consider where you have been and who taught you the things that you know. Long after this page is deleted our species will continue to seek a method by which our survival will be insured. That method must include the investment of power toward the production of more power. This is a fact that you the reader will now know from now on. Work on it. You will gain power. Good luck. Your enemies wish to censor this power from you. They thrive on making power scarce to you. Think woman. Think man. Read this: http://www.restoretherepublic.com/component/option,com_docman/task,doc_download/gid,101/Itemid,59/ The author who wrote that knew Joe's Law. There is no name for Joe's Law yet. The name is immaterial. The person who discovers Joe’s Law is immaterial. Power will be invested to gain more power and the cost will reduce as more power is produced. These are facts. Purchasing power increase as power cost reduces. Power does, in fact, reduce the cost of production. Connect the dots people. Next are numerous sources explaining how purchasing power works when the power of falsehood is not infecting the issue. These too are immaterial to the existence of Joe’s Law (or whatever word describes the economic relationship between power, supply, demand, price, cost, and investment. These next sources merely offer the study a base from which understanding can begin. http://tmh.floonet.net/pdf/jwarren.pdf Equitable Commerce illustrates the power of currency as currency exists without fraud or violence incorporated into the issue of currency. http://www.anarchism.net/scienceofsociety.htm The Science of Society is Equitable Commerce for Dummies. http://www.lysanderspooner.org/papercurrency.htm A New System of Paper Currency lends more data proving the facts concerning the power of currency and the relationship between supply, demand, and the effects of the powers of fraud and violence upon the issue of currency. http://www.the-portal.org/mutual_banking.htm Mutual Banking exposes something the author calls “The Parasite City” where a fraudulent and violent usurpation of the power to issue legal currency where a monopoly of that issue creates the power to charge interest for the use of currency. http://www.globalideasbank.org/site/bank/idea.php?ideaId=904 That source reports on a historical example of a currency issue where the power of currency is used to create negative interest by employing stamp script, where the value of currency depreciates in time. http://www.perfecteconomy.com/pg-parable-of-perfect-economy.html That source exposes the criminal nature of monopoly currency issue in a very precise manner leaving no room for argument without resorting to falsehood. http://www.transaction.net/money/cc/cc01.html Another source exposing the power of free market currency issue where competition works to increase quality and reduce cost which is the fundamental incentive leading to the discovery of Joe’s Law. http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article19888.htm "These are interesting times. With oil trading above $100/barrel, a larger portion of our national wealth is being spent on the cost of energy." When applying Joe's Law to the above described situation the end result is a realization concerning the facts of oil prices. As oil prices increase the power of producing power at home increases. Joe's Law becomes even more obviously affordable. Compare a person who does not understand Joe's Law to someone who does. Someone who does not understand Joe's Law may continue to put dollars in a 401K retirement account while someone who does understand Joe's law invests in Solar Panels and an Electric Car or two. As Joe's law works in time the person who does not understand Joe's Law pays the higher price of gasoline while the person who does understand Joe's Law produces the fuel for his car from the sun. One person pays the price while the other person earns power at home. The math calculations are easier to see as Joe's Law operates concerning the price of oil. Joe’s Law person A can buy the Solar Panels and the Electric cars even when using legal currency that costs an interest payment and still pay less per month than the non-Joe’s Law person. The savings in electricity, natural gas, and gasoline costs offset the monthly payment on the Solar Panels and the Electric Cars. The person applying Joe’s Law ends up with money in his pocket every month while the non-Joe’s Law person continues to work more and more for less and less. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-QA2rkpBSY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pb3JI8F9LQQ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFyOw9IgtjY http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQd-VGYX3-E If the reader is inclined to participate in this endeavor to discover Joe's Law there can be realization concerning two things. Communist Banking Interest (Federal Reserve Corporation Banks) works to transfer purchasing power from those who earn it to those who run the Banks. That is item number one to realize while considering the mathematical certainties of exponential growth. Item two is something that led me to understand Joe’s Law. If you, or I, or anyone on the plant were to purchase and install one Solar Panel today, just one, that one Solar Panel will double or re-product itself in less than 10 years at today’s prices. If everyone where to do the same thing the exponential growth rate of electric power produced by the Sun increases by the number of people living (6 billion or so). There are two items to consider for you. A. Exponential growth of power from those who earn it to those who run Banking Interest monopolies of Legal Currency (Communist, Fascist, Federal Reserve type Economic Monetary Systems) B. Exponential growth of electrical power generated from sunlight (wind power, lunar or tide power, and other devises that pay for themselves over time and then reproduce themselves in time). Joe’s Law is similar to the mathematical formulas being reported in the links you are viewing (assuming the censors can view things or read). Part 5: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHuwgxrTKPo Part 6: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-3y7UlHdhAU Part 7: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RyseLQVpJEI Part 8: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VoiiVnQadwE Before someone confuses Joe's Law to be a prediction of future doom associated with over-population and Peak-Oil please know otherwise. There is a need to understand exponential growth in power producers. When power is invested into the production of power producers (such as Solar Panels, Wind Generators, etc.) the supply of power increases it does not decrease. http://www.ted.com/talks/view/id/51 "It is cheaper to save fuel than buy fuel." That counters the non-solution oriented math lesson earlier. Last edited on Sat May 10th, 2008 10:07 am by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
The following is Joe's Law on RTR: http://www.restoretherepublic.com/component/option,com_fireboard/Itemid,27/func,view/id,5808/catid,34/ This is both a description and an example of Joe's Law. Joe's Law is a multi part economic law based upon the cost principle and the power principle. Joe's Law therefore has many parts. Part I of Joe's Law dictates: Power reproduces itself Power invested in the creation of power produces more power out of less power. Example: One oil well, gold mine, farm, Solar Panel, or Federal Reserve Bank (Communist State Bank) produced and running will produce enough power to re-produce another example of the original. At the time when the second oil well, gold mine, farm, Solar Panel, or Communist State Bank begins producing more power the total amount of power being produced will double. Part II of Joes Law dictates: Power produced into a condition or state of oversupply will push the price of power lower and therefore power reaching for over-supply will push the cost of power to zero. Example: How much does oxygen cost? Oxygen is power. Plants produce oxygen. How much do we, as human beings, pay the plants for oxygen? How much do the plants charge the humans for the consumption of oxygen? The opposite of Joe’s Law Part II can be seen as a General Strike conducted by the Union of Earth Plant life. How much will the plants on this planet charge the humans for oxygen if the plants of this earth go on strike and stop producing and re-producing oxygen? How much will you pay for your oxygen once the supply of oxygen reaches a state of scarcity, which is the opposite of a state of abundance? Oxygen is power. Part III of Joe’s Law dictates: When power is produced into a state of over-supply and the price of power reaches for zero there will be an increase in pecuniary (money) purchasing power since power reduces the cost of production. This part of Joe’s Law may be the most difficult part to comprehend for the human life forms on the planet earth. The plant forms probably know this law better at this time in human history. That does not bode well for the chances of human life’s survival when plants are smarter than human beings. The easiest way to understand how Joe’s Law works is to first view the opposite of Joe’s Law as the supply of Oil reaches a state of scarcity and therefore the cost of living rises in almost lock step or inverse proportion, where each increase in the price of oil corresponds with an increase in the price of everything. As the price of oil doubles the price of everything doubles. As the price of oil reduces the price of everything reduces. This relationship is a natural law (Joe’s Law) and this relationship does not require the understanding of the people who are affected by this natural economic law. Plants don’t care either. For all the plants care, like the amount that the humans care, life on earth will die off for lack of care concerning true economic laws. Joe’s Law in its complete form (to be perfected if possible) reads as follows (dictates): Power produced into a state of oversupply reaches for zero cost as purchasing power increases because power lowers the cost of production. Another part of Joe's Law has to do with the currency of language. This thread intends to move Joe's Law to the first page in a Google Search for "Joe's Law". At this time 5:02 am Thursday May 8, 2008 the Google Search Engine lists Joe's Law (as described here) in third place. Joe's Law also says that new language can be moved to the top spot on the Google Search Engine. Example: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=No+More+Legal+Criminals |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
The following is Joe's Law on Anarchism. net http://www.anarchism.net/forum/board_entry.php?id=28223
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe%27s_Law Please consider adjusting that web page to a final state before it is deleted. If you invest the time and energy toward understanding how this economic law works you may be surprise and delighted by it. It is very simple. The latest addition added to that web page by me today concerns an article written about the relationship between the Oil supply and prosperity. That is a simple enough relationship for most people to comprehend since most people use gasoline to fuel up their cars and trucks. A home bound grocery shopper may have to stop at the gas station on the way to pick up food for the family and find out that less food can be purchased because more money went to pay for the gas. A business man running a fleet of trucks may have to cut costs, eliminate a few mechanics, and reduce the quality of his product since the loss of Oil increases the price he must pay to keep the trucks rolling. These are all reverses of Joe’s Law. The opposite is the grocery shopper who now generates electricity at home with her Solar Panels and she drives to the store with her electric car. The cost of the Solar Panels and the Electric Car are paid by the new electric power generated by the Solar Panels and by the savings in the cost of gasoline. She has more pocket money because her monthly bills of electricity, loans, interest, and gasoline are lower since she invested in Solar Panels and an Electric Car. She has more money to buy better food and more food. She even has more money to use for the kids education. The Fleet operator may have been running a factory with delivery trucks and his power is now increased with Solar Panels, a large Wind Generator, and hydrogen from water powered devices on his trucks to reduce his Diesel fuel costs by 20 percent. Perhaps his fleet of sales vehicles is now electric cars instead of gas guzzlers. The high cost of electricity at peak times is now a low cost of electricity during sunny days and windy days. The entrepreneur uses excess electricity during peak production hours (windy and sunny days) to pump water and do other work that can store energy for later use when the wind isn’t blowing and the sun is not shining. Excess power can even be used to produce hydrogen fuel to run a reciprocating engine attached to an electric generator. This wise entrepreneur is merely applying Joe’s Law and reducing costs by increasing power production. Compared to his competitors this entrepreneur can remain in business and flourish. His competitors continue to pay high electric costs, high gasoline costs, and high diesel costs. The competition downsizes for lack of power. Next is an article to illustrate what happens when people invest power into the creation of power stealing products or power destroying products. http://blog.washingtonpost.com/earlywarning/2008/05/a_secret_afghanistan_mission_p.html#more |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/174929 Returning to the above link a quote applies to the economic law (whatever name that one may want to use to label that law):
Look, please, at this sentence: This represents the single largest contribution to America's balance-of-payments deficit, and is a leading cause for the dollar's ongoing drop in value. Step back and please re-consider what you know or think you know about our world. Borrow my method of dealing with all the complexity of our world as it exists and see the simple truth. Power is a necessary item, or supply, that ensures the survival of any living being. See this easily. What happens if the Sun stops supplying power to the human species? Think about that in context to our current situation. Will the Legal Criminals running the U.S. government fraud attack Iran for any reason at all when the Sun stops sending power to the human species? The answer is clearly no. There would be more important sources of power to steal and consume before the inevitable end of our species. Those who have power will use that power to steal and consume the remaining power needed to ensure survival. Without the Sun there is no hope for the human race. Work with me here for a little longer. Suppose the Sun kept on shining, but oxygen left the plant earth. Oxygen is another source of power. Suppose our human world suffered through an oxygen crisis. Think about that and consider where oxygen is produced. Would the U.S. Criminal government invade and secure the Amazon rain forest so as to steal the oxygen produced from that forest? Would they torture and mass murder all the indigenous population until such time as the natives signed the oxygen law? How much would the cost of a gallon of oxygen rise toward? How much oxygen could you afford to purchase with your monthly pay-check? Water is a source of power. Do you people really think that water (hydrogen and oxygen) cannot possibly fuel an automobile? What makes you believe that the world is round? If the powers that be decided to program their victims into a false belief in the health benefits of smoking tobacco would you, could you, think that such power was possible? My advice is to get off the Dooms Day Parade and think about the forces involved in the concept that I have tried to communicate to you. In desperation I’ve labeled that concept with the label: Joe’s Law. I may or may not find the power to work on applying Joe’s Law toward the Liberal/Conservative duplicity, where the legal criminals managed to divide and conquer their victims. That same duplicity goes by the names Capitalism and Socialism. How about answering a question? Is the military a conservative/capitalist entity? There is no better example of socialism than an involuntary military relationship and that relationship does not have to be called: conscription. People can be ‘inspired’ to join no their own power to discriminate right from left. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.tomdispatch.com/post/174929 Returning to the above link a quote applies to the economic law (whatever name that one may want to use to label that law):
Look, please, at this sentence: This represents the single largest contribution to America's balance-of-payments deficit, and is a leading cause for the dollar's ongoing drop in value. Step back and please re-consider what you know or think you know about our world. Borrow my method of dealing with all the complexity of our world as it exists and see the simple truth. Power is a necessary item, or supply, that ensures the survival of any living being. See this easily. What happens if the Sun stops supplying power to the human species? Think about that in context to our current situation. Will the Legal Criminals running the U.S. government fraud attack Iran for any reason at all when the Sun stops sending power to the human species? The answer is clearly no. There would be more important sources of power to steal and consume before the inevitable end of our species. Those who have power will use that power to steal and consume the remaining power needed to ensure survival. Without the Sun there is no hope for the human race. Work with me here for a little longer. Suppose the Sun kept on shining, but oxygen left the plant earth. Oxygen is another source of power. Suppose our human world suffered through an oxygen crisis. Think about that and consider where oxygen is produced. Would the U.S. Criminal government invade and secure the Amazon rain forest so as to steal the oxygen produced from that forest? Would they torture and mass murder all the indigenous population until such time as the natives signed the oxygen law? How much would the cost of a gallon of oxygen rise toward? How much oxygen could you afford to purchase with your monthly pay-check? Water is a source of power. Do you people really think that water (hydrogen and oxygen) cannot possibly fuel an automobile? What makes you believe that the world is round? If the powers that be decided to program their victims into a false belief in the health benefits of smoking tobacco would you, could you, think that such power was possible? My advice is to get off the Dooms Day Parade and think about the forces involved in the concept that I have tried to communicate to you. In desperation I’ve labeled that concept with the label: Joe’s Law. I may or may not find the power to work on applying Joe’s Law toward the Liberal/Conservative duplicity, where the legal criminals managed to divide and conquer their victims. That same duplicity goes by the names Capitalism and Socialism. How about answering a question? Is the military a conservative/capitalist entity? There is no better example of socialism than an involuntary military relationship and that relationship does not have to be called: conscription. People can be ‘inspired’ to join no their own power to discriminate right from left. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://tinyurl.com/6qzdwd +++++++++++ The Saudis are widely believed to be concerned that escalating oil prices - crude hovered around $134 a barrel Thursday, nearly double what it cost a year ago - will cause a permanent drop in demand as consumers get more efficient or, worse, the global economy slows. ++++++++++++ If, in fact, oil prices are going up because there isn’t any other choice, because the costs and scarcity of oil are increasing and therefore oil cannot be sold at a lower price without giving oil away at or below cost, then the competition will gain market share – end of story. That means, if that is true, that oil prices are inevitably going to rise, then Solar Power will over-power oil power right now. On the other hand; if the price of oil is merely a speculative gamble whereby the oil suppliers are restricting and blocking the flow of oil so as to make oil scarce on purpose, then Solar Power can be made less powerful as a competitor by merely increasing the flow of oil and thereby reducing the price of oil. See? Is that as easy to see as a beautiful model in a bathing suit? How about a link? http://my.break.com/content/view.aspx?ContentID=523220 |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article20313.htm
Washington hit back by ensuring that Russian companies are left out in the cold from the 30 contracts for lucrative oil deals that Baghdad is awarding. It is a big blow for Russia. In February, Moscow had written off US$12 billion or 93% of Iraq's debt to Russia in a move that was widely seen as aimed to help Russian oil company LUKoil regain the Saddam Hussein-era rights to develop Iraq's giant West Qurna-2 oil field. But under US pressure, the Iraqi government is now awarding West Qurna-2 to the US's Chevron. The Iranian leader also suggested to Miller a market-sharing arrangement so that Russia and Iran could "collectively meet the demands of Europe, India and China in the gas sector". During the visit, an agreement was signed on the development of Iran's oil and gas fields by Russian companies; on Russian participation in the transfer of Iran's Caspian Sea crude oil to the Oman Sea; cooperation in the development of Iran's fabulous North Azadegan oil field; and, possible participation of Gazprom in the planned Iran-Pakistan-India gas pipeline project. Evidently, Moscow took a deliberate decision to press ahead with Iran in energy cooperation in the full glare of world publicity in complete disregard of US displeasure. Tehran loved it. Last edited on Fri Jul 18th, 2008 06:26 pm by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.consciousmedianetwork.com/news.htm
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article20636.htm
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?view=DETAILS&grid=&xml=/money/2008/08/29/cnrussia129.xml
Please note another layer of hypocrisy propagated by the legal criminals. The Dollar Hegemony Corporate Criminals finance an aggressive criminal invasion of another country to secure more oil from that other country and in the process the criminal invasion of another country tortures and mass murders incalculable human life. Does anyone know each story of each person tortured and murdered by that criminal aggression and employment of weapons of mass destruction by the corporate criminals? Meanwhile the response by another legal organization defends the continued slaughter of the innocent victims, which is hardly a crime since defense against torture and mass murder is not a crime unless, of course, you happen to be torturing and mass murdering for profit and then, I suppose, you may consider it to be a crime when someone defends against your torturing and mass murdering for profit business. Next up is a cut off of power flowing from the defenders to the torturing mass murderers and the torturing mass murderers view this as being an Oil Weapon? The Kangaroo Court Inc. was ‘over the top’ the moment the ink dried on The Constitution, yet the slide down into hell after going over the top continues to ever new depths of depravity. These people are serial killers. These people are predators who torture and mass murder babies. Wake up people. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article20647.htm
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Here are three links that can help illustrate Joe's Law. http://www.wavepartner.eu/page_1219330357093.html That first link is easy to understand for someone like me who has worked 25 years in the construction industry as a mechanic, equipment operator, plant operator, plant repairman, etc. The idea is sound. That method of producing electric power is extremely profitable at today’s prices of electricity. Joe’s Law defined again: Power produced into a state of oversupply will reduce the price of power while purchasing power increases because power reduces the costs of production. Now add the following link: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6157958993884349118&q=joseph+newman I don’t know if that thing actually works. I have to look into that thing with more intensity. The idea is to desalinate water and thereby make fresh water out of salt water. So the two links now show a very profitable way to use the ocean waves to generate electricity at very low costs per kilowatt/hour, combined with, a machine that uses very little electricity to pump water up and extract salt from the water. Now look at this link: http://www.championtrees.org/topsoil/SeaEnergy.htm I’ve just found these links so more work on validity is needed; however the principles involved are already being proven in practice by many people so I’m merely the messenger in this data stream. Combining all three links will combine three powerful new industries to help link the ocean based communities with other communities such as the place where I live in the Mojave Desert. Anywhere on the Planet where power is needed, clean water is needed, and food is needed, these three powerful links empower people. The last link is to link these links to the people who can make more power in their thinking process. Power produced into a state of oversupply (not scarcity) will decrease the price of power (not increase it) while purchasing power increases (not decreases) because power reduces the costs of production, and therefore reduces the price of everything (not increasing the price of everything) made with power (which is everything). |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Here are three links that can help illustrate Joe's Law. http://www.wavepartner.eu/page_1219330357093.html I have chosen to use cheap materials only, in this demonstration, because the need to bring down production costs, and make it possible to build this type of wave generation device, any where in the world, and with local materials, as car parts etc, which doesn't needs to be imported. Other materials could of course be used, and the schematics for its design of course, be different. Simple is better, it is said, and fewer parts, and bearings, will bring lower cost of building, and also repair. That first link is easy to understand for someone like me who has worked 25 years in the construction industry as a mechanic, equipment operator, plant operator, plant repairman, etc. The idea is sound. That method of producing electric power is extremely profitable at today’s prices of electricity. Joe’s Law defined again: Power produced into a state of oversupply will reduce the price of power while purchasing power increases because power reduces the costs of production. Now add the following link: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6157958993884349118&q=joseph+newman I don’t know if that thing actually works. I have to look into that thing with more intensity. The idea is to desalinate water and thereby make fresh water out of salt water. So the two links now show a very profitable way to use the ocean waves to generate electricity at very low costs per kilowatt/hour, combined with, a machine that uses very little electricity to pump water up and extract salt from the water. Now look at this link: http://www.championtrees.org/topsoil/SeaEnergy.htm I’ve just found these links so more work on validity is needed; however the principles involved are already being proven in practice by many people so I’m merely the messenger in this data stream. Combining all three links will combine three powerful new industries to help link the ocean based communities with other communities such as the place where I live in the Mojave Desert. Anywhere on the Planet where power is needed, clean water is needed, and food is needed, these three powerful links empower people. The last link is to link these links to the people who can make more power in their thinking process. Power produced into a state of oversupply (not scarcity) will decrease the price of power (not increase it) while purchasing power increases (not decreases) because power reduces the costs of production, and therefore reduces the price of everything (not increasing the price of everything) made with power (which is everything). Here is another link: http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/423.html |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article20709.htm
Power produced into a state of oversupply will reduce the price of power while purchasing power increases because power reduces the cost of production. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://mises.org/story/3060 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jipp_curve I paid to attend a Financial Markets Conference in Las Vegas in 2005, at The Venetian Hotel, and my main interest and questions concerned this subject and the power of connectivity. Those people then refused to answer my questions. Their answer then was “If you can’t beat me’, join em’.” Now they publish these observations of fact. Connectivity can be seen as the path of least resistance in an electric circuit. As soon as someone (like the Austrian legal criminals with their capitalist legal crimes) endeavors to block the free flow of currency the power pushing that currency goes around the blockage and finds a new path of connectivity. The Mises Institute people are infected by a bunch of crooks. They prey upon the weak, and they spread disinformation as a means of profit, at the expense of their powerless victims. Fortunately those lying legal criminals will eventually be consumed by their own crimes and free flowing power, to all, will gain market share. I saw the path of least resistance, where power flows to everyone and no one is censored, blocked, or excluded by legal criminals and their power to eliminate competition back before 2005. One very good explanation of how that path of least resistance gains market share exponentially is found in something called The Prisoner’s Dilemma. Look here: http://prisonersdilemma.groenefee.nl/ I have to use Mozilla Firefox to enable the Applet on that page. Work with the Applet and see how the forces of despotism (crime) work against the forces of cooperation (the path of least resistance). Once the balance of power tips in favor of cooperators, the result is the practical elimination of crime. The balance of power can tip the opposite way too, and for that to be understood clearly my suggestion to the reader is a study of the words written by Alexandr I Solzhenitsyn. Here is one of his messages: http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/literature/laureates/1970/solzhenitsyn-lecture.html And on top of this we are threatened by destruction in the fact that the physically compressed, strained world is not allowed to blend spiritually; the molecules of knowledge and sympathy are not allowed to jump over from one half to the other. This presents a rampant danger: THE SUPPRESSION OF INFORMATION between the parts of the planet. Contemporary science knows that suppression of information leads to entropy and total destruction. Suppression of information renders international signatures and agreements illusory; within a muffled zone it costs nothing to reinterpret any agreement, even simpler - to forget it, as though it had never really existed. (Orwell understood this supremely.) A muffled zone is, as it were, populated not by inhabitants of the Earth, but by an expeditionary corps from Mars; the people know nothing intelligent about the rest of the Earth and are prepared to go and trample it down in the holy conviction that they come as "liberators". I realize the possibility that the reader may not understand what I am going on about with the Austrian Economists; therefore I can explain. The Austrian Economists have two faces. One face is the face that blames all the bad things that happen in the world on The Socialists. That same face praises The Capitalists. The other face perpetrates all the bad things done by The Socialists. Here is a prime example. The finger is being pointed toward all the bad things done to suppress the free flow of information. In this case the culprit is The Dictator. The Dictator suppresses information. Look here: http://www.austrianforum.com/index.php?showforum=12 Once upon a time I had permission to post information on that public access forum, then my voice was censored by those dictators. The odd thing (that I cannot explain and that I cannot gain access to find the answer from the people who perpetrate this form of censorship) is the fact that my work remains published, on that site. Here is an example of my work: http://www.austrianforum.com/index.php?showtopic=253 That is the work that led to Joe’s Law. Here is more: http://www.austrianforum.com/index.php?showtopic=364 In that thread the personal attacks become obvious. I just wanted to point out that your diagrams, taken together, form some sort of abstract hellscape that doesn't really communicate much other than a sense of panic and chaos among stick figures. It's like an impressionist's take on economics. Reading things like "Money is energy" indicates that your "gift" extends beyond MS-Paint, but honestly there's only so much of this a person can take without the assistance of narcotics. Here is where the hammer fell down upon me (The Iron Fist): http://www.austrianforum.com/index.php?showtopic=1057 In that thread my effort was to communicate with another forum member. The moderators stepped in. I don’t think it is a coincidence that, at that time, I was also posting links to expose the crimes of 911 where the U.S. government legal criminals murdered thousands of people in New York City on September 11, 2001. The personal attacks began with this: The link is to a kook site which, among other things, advocates the elimination of interest rates. Care to comment more fully on your intent in posting the link, and your thoughts on the content of that site? I did care to expand upon the accurate observations of how “interest” is, in fact, a flow of power from those who produce power to those who steal it by fraud or violence, or “interest” is merely a cost paid by a high risk borrower to an insurance fund. I had much to say on that subject, and I still do. The dictator voice becomes ever louder during the process by which the dictator censors the unwelcome information. Here: That was not an attack: it was an order. As a mod, I'm one of the persons you implicitly accused of wishing to censor or silence you. If you blather enough about how "the mods will probably lock the thread and shut me up, etc., etc.," then a mod--possibly I--will indeed take some sort of action. Thus you are encouraged to stow it. Here: Let me say this plainly, so as to leave no doubt. Never ask that question again. Completely and utterly drop that subject. If you have something to say about economics, say it. Clear? Soon after that exchange my I.P. address was blocked to that site. How are those two faced dictators any different than the situation they publish concerning China and the leaders in China endeavoring to censor unwelcome information? The answer is clear, very clear, there is no difference in principle, the difference is a matter of degree. Last edited on Sat Sep 20th, 2008 12:03 pm by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Anyone, Anyone can create an economic boom, prosperity, and anyone can maintain a steady rate of increase in wealth, at any time, and in any place, on the planet earth, when anyone has control of productive power. Curious readers are skeptical, but reasonable, due to the nature of curiosity, as experience rewards the interest in knowing a more accurate perception. In other words, the proof is in the pudding. If a reader finds a new method of saving time and energy the reader will test the new way out in real time with personal power employed toward that new productive venture. A very simple example, for any interested reader, is a new connection to a new source of money where the cost of the money is lower. Who would pay 10 percent interest when 1 percent interest is offered by a competitor? No one, not even the least interested person, will pay more for less on purpose. Faced with a choice between a mortgage interest loan of 100,000 dollars at 10 percent interest, on one hand, and another mortgage interest loan for 200,000 dollars at 1 percent interest on the other hand, the choice is a no brainer. Someone without a brain would still choose more for less. No one would choose less for more, don’t be silly. Readers know this and that is why readers read. Reading is the method by which more is found for less. The alternative to reading is trial and error. Reading connects all the trials and all the errors into one big pool of knowledge where all the readers can swim around and find more for less sooner rather than too late. Is it too late for anyone, anywhere, to begin creating a personal economic boom where that individual produces more, and more, for less, and less? The answer is clearly no. It is not too late and despite all the doom and gloom that currently infects human society, the method by which personal economic prosperity can be earned remains right where it has always been, and it remains readily available for use at any time, and anywhere, on the planet earth. Productive power is abundant and the method by which productive power creates more productive power is the method by which human beings prosper. Why are people failing to see the vast possibilities and opportunities offered to us in our environment here on earth? What is holding our species back, and behind, in our progress toward civilized prosperity for us and for our progeny? We lack command of abundant power. We do not lack the power. Power is abundant. Abundant power can be employed in the process of creating more power. Power invested toward the creation of more power increases the availability of abundant power. Greater availability of abundant power increases the power available to create even more power. Readers do not see this – we could. The power that is necessary to know how power is abundant and to know how power can be invested into the creation of more power is the missing element that empowers economic bust. The reader may suffer from ignorance concerning these facts that are now offered. A reader may also suffer from something worse than ignorance, much worse. There is a very serious destructive power flowing through human society, currently, in human time. That destructive power has a name, but the name is not important. It is important to know the destructive nature of the power because the destructive power blocks each person from access to abundant productive power. Falsehood is the abundant destructive power that currently infects human society. Here is where the reader can employ the power of knowledge to confirm any doubts concerning the method by which human beings will prosper while our supposed betters, our supposed leaders, and our supposed law givers destroy human society in America and around the world. These legal criminals cause booms and busts, here and there, at will; because they know and employ the power you can now know. While the legal criminals destroy the American economy the reader of this expose’ can know how that destructive power can be ignored in favor of investments in productive power. All that is needed is one more person, one more reader, gaining command of productive power and passing that knowledge on to two more readers who then gain command of productive power. In time the power commanded by the legal criminals (falsehood) will grow weaker while the power of honest and productive self-employment will grow stronger. The reader can know, now, how honest currency is the power shared by honest and productive people, and this type of currency (honest) is the power that people can command to gain access to abundant productive power. These words exemplify honest currency in the form of text. The text is merely an intersection on the productive path. These words merely point, like a road sign, toward a path on which abundant power is found. Each reader must then employ the productive power on this path, invest that power, and create more power along the way on this path. Abundant power then becomes more abundant. More abundant power is invested to create even more abundant power, on the way, on this path, as more and more people gain greater control of power until all thoughts of powerlessness are removed from current thought among honest productive people. Time limits the number of words that the reader can read here, so the path being described now must jump ahead of the many individual paths traveled by many individual readers. The path being described now will describe a future common path traveled by many honest and productive individuals and the method of describing that path involves the creation and maintenance of a new and powerful honest currency. Please know that honest currency is being created and employed by honest and productive people, this is merely words to the wise. Keep an eye out for honest currency in all forms, not just the form that I describe. The form that this new and powerful honest currency will be is not set in stone by me. The form I offer is meant to illustrate the principles and the interests shared by honest productive people as we earn our own prosperity and as we bypass all the falsehood that has been injected into our social networks by legal criminals. Two new products will suffice to illustrate this new path that we take in our work to create more and more power, invest power, and earn prosperity for posterity. These two products are monetary in nature, however it is more easily understood when these two products are seen, and labeled, as currency. It is even more accurate to view these two new products as honest forms of currency. I must now expend some time and effort (power) to explain both products briefly and then the reader must employ personal power to conceptualize the significant changes that will occur when honest currency replaces the false currency that now infects our calamitous existence in America. It is also important to know that I do not intend to support new forms of dishonest currency such as the Amero dollar, or any other false currency offered by legal criminals. Product one is a form of credit. It is not accurate to view this product as a form of debt. Product one is a form of credit. Product one is designed to honor honest people who have earned a high credit rating by their honest and productive industry where every loan borrowed has been paid back on time. Someone who has historically paid back every loan, on time, is someone who has earned credit – not debt. Product one is made available to everyone who has proven to be willing and able to pay back every cent of money that is borrowed. Product one is designed to replace false currency. Product one is designed to compete against the dishonest and fraudulent Dollar offered by The Federal Reserve Corporation monetary supply business. Product one is designed to bail out every honest and productive person in America. Product one is designed to capture all the banking business in America, as soon as humanly possible. Product one is designed to offer honest and productive people more for less. Product one is not designed to generate any more power. Product two is designed to generate more power. Product one is designed to supply America with the money demanded by honest and productive Americans. You can now know how that can be done by product one if you have an interest in knowing how the supply of money demanded by honest and productive Americans can be supplied by product one, instead of fraudulent and criminal money. Product one is a home and business property mortgage loan that does not cost the borrower any interest payments and there are no transaction fees that are charged to honest and productive Americans who have a history of good credit. Each loan amount will be new money and each loan of new money will be backed by the property title of each new loan. The new money will go from the new legal supplier of the new money to the home owner and then the current mortgage owner receives the new money. The home title goes to the honest and productive American who earned good, honest, credit. The whole loan amount pays off the old interest mortgage. The home and business owner then pays off the entire new loan amount, without interest, to the new money supplier with monthly payments of legal money earned by the honest and productive home and business owner. When the last payment is paid to the new money supplier the home is no longer backing the currency that circulates in society, however the new money supplier can design new money backed by other commodities such as gold, silver, platinum, and a basket of foreign currencies since the new money will be legal tender and designed by specific, rather than ambiguous, law. The new currency supplier will accept dollars or new currency as payment based upon accurate exchange rates. If the Dollar value plummets while the new money value increases, then honest and productive people will demand payment in either more dollars or less of the new currency, just like everyone else. The idea is to pit honest currency against fraudulent currency in open and honest competition. Who will accept less for more? Who will demand the dishonest money instead of the honest currency? Think about it. If the productive and honest American with good credit fails to pay of this new loan the title of the property goes to the new money supplier. The old mortgage owner has been paid off and the question of where and what happens to that money once the old mortgage owner spends or invests that money remains to be known. It is know that the old mortgage company will not collect any more interest from customers who purchase product number one unless customers default on new money loans and therefore their credit ratings lower. It is vital at this time to understand how the new money will be good enough and valuable enough to be used to pay off taxes; in other words: the new money will be legal money. The new honest currency is designed to compete with the old fraudulent money on a level playing field. The fraudulent money and the new honest currency are both designed to be legal tender and therefore both can be used to pay taxes based upon their actual relative value or their current rate of exchange. If the fraudulent money value plummets while the new honest currency value remains steady, then it will take more fraudulent money to pay the same tax debt compared to the higher value honest currency. The reader must use the power of reason at this time. What will happen when product one hits the shelf next to all those other products on the shelf in the current banking business? Honest currency will compete against Euros, Yuan, and Yen as well as honest currency competing against The Federal Reserve Fraud money. Any honest and productive American, with good credit, who currently pays 6 percent interest, a 6 percent debt added to the loan principle, can turn in that loan for a new loan where no interest is charged and no transaction fee is charged. Product one is a clear example of a choice between more for less compared to less for more. Which honest and productive American will choose less for more? How many honest and productive American workers, business owners, employers, and home owners will turn down a no interest home and business credit mortgage in favor of their current debt based mortgage at 6 percent interest – and higher? Product one is designed to supply the demand for honest and productive currency. People who demand honest and productive currency will get it. People who demand fraudulent money can have fraudulent money if they want it. Product two is designed to generate an income. Product two is a one percent interest loan to any honest and productive American, with good credit, who desires to employ power toward the creation of more power at home and at the business property. Product two is designed to generate income for the borrower and the supplier of product two. Product two is offered for specific purchases only. The design of product two is specific to specific purchases. Product two is a loan offered at one percent interest because the purchase will generate more than one percent greater power. In order for the reader to understand what is meant by the design of product two it is vital for the reader to consider a few examples of the things that product two is designed to purchase. Product two is designed to purchase proven investments only. One example is the solar panel. Another example is the electric car. I pick those two examples for a specific reason and any inventive, honest, and productive American can pick their own proven examples of purchases that have been proven to produce more power than the power required for the purchase. If the reader is at all confused, please, stop reading and return to this lengthy expose’ when your mind has cleared up some; when you return to this text this text will go on to exemplify what is meant when a person purchases something that generates more power than the power needed for the purchase. If one solar panel is priced at 1,000 dollars and that solar panel will produce 1,000 dollars worth of electricity in 5 years, then that solar panel is paid off in 5 years – simple. It is not too complicated to then see how that solar panel will continue to produce for 20 more years. The price of the solar panel is 1000 dollars while the output of the solar panel is 1,000 dollars every 5 years for a total of 5,000 dollars worth of electric power - more for less. The price is 1,000 dollars. The output of production is worth 5,000 dollars. The purchase is a purchase that falls into the design feature of the monetary loan product number two because the product purchased produces more that the cost of the product. Product 2 is designed to cause a given amount of power to be invested into the creation of more power. Product 1 was meant to gain market share. Product two generates an income. Product 1 is a no interest loan to qualified borrowers. Product two charges the borrower a one percent simple interest debt that is based upon the proven credit of the borrower and that debt is designed to create an income for the supplier of the loan. The supplier of the loan must also make an income. One percent is a huge amount of value when dealing with large numbers. Who will turn down the opportunity to employ power to create more power? The borrower keeps a portion of the new income and pays a portion of new income to the supplier of the new honest currency loan. The power produced is electricity when the loan is invested for the purchase of a solar panel. When the product purchased will produce more than one percent extra power, like a solar panel, the borrower keeps the extra power income and the borrower earns enough to pay the interest charged by the supplier of honest currency. In the case of the solar panel the purchase generates enough power to pay off the principle in five years and the purchase generates enough power to pay off the one percent interest charge too. The solar panel keeps on producing more power many years after the entire loan principle and the entire loan interest is paid off in full. In the case of the product 2 loans being used for the production of electricity by solar panels purchases the total supply of power increases as more sunlight is converted into productive electric power. The second example offered to the reader is an electric car purchase. This is another example of what product 2 is designed to produce. Product 2 is designed to produce products that produce more power than the power needed to produce the product. If the product cannot be proven to produce more power than the power required to produce the product, then the product does not qualify for a product 2 loan. Does an electric car produce more power than the cost of the product? This is easy to see when comparing the cost of running an electric car compared to the cost of running a petroleum powered car. The electric car costs about 2 cents per mile compared to the cost of 10 cents per mile for a petroleum powered car. If the person applying for a product 2 loan produces electric power at home with solar panels, then the lower cost of electricity can lower than 2 cents per mile cost of running the electric car. If the person applying for a product 2 loan commutes from work to home and back, with a gas guzzling car today, and today that loan applicant pays about 100 dollars per week for gasoline, then that person can save 80 dollars per week and prove the investment of purchasing an electric car according to the design of the product 2 loan. If the loan applicant is also purchasing solar panels with the same loan, then the electric car can prove to save 90 dollars per week, or more, once the Solar Panels are paid for by the new production of electric power. Product one and Product two are designed together to cover all the needs of modern business demands for honest currency, except fraudulent business demands. If the reader cannot conceive of this simple solution to a problem that is made complex by design (made false by design), then the reader ought to consider why. Why could this simple solution be so easily misunderstood? Who owns the power of honest currency? Who owns the reader’s mind? Make no mistake, what you have just read is an example of propaganda, you have the power to decide if it is true or false. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.livescience.com/environment/081006-energy-costs.html
With the right state and federal incentives applied, however, well-located wind turbines can pay for themselves within 15 years, or half their useful life. Depending on where it's situated, the average system will cost about a few thousand dollars — $10,000 for really large systems — but installation, permits and piping costs can quickly add up the further the water or electricity needs to travel from the generator to your home, especially if the terrain makes pipelines difficult to install. The break-even period? As little as a couple of years, depending on your energy usage. While a geothermal system costs more than a conventional oil- or natural-gas-dependent system, the cost of running heat pumps is actually 30 to 40 percent less than a conventional system that runs fossil fuel, meaning you'll be able to save enough on reduced heating and cooling bills to break even in two to 10 years. How about these: http://www.ecogeek.org/content/view/1476/ http://gas2.org/2008/03/29/first-algae-biodiesel-plant-goes-online-april-1-2008/ http://www.wavepartner.eu/page_1219330357093.html |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse....ticle20956.htm ? When frauds lie, who trusts that it is a lie? |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://news.cnet.com/8301-11128_3-10066974-54.html
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
quote: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article21041.htm Listen to that and then see this: http://news.cnet.com/8301-11128_3-10066974-54.html quote: And this: http://www.techradar.com/news/world-of-tech/future-tech/new-solar-tech-is-over-the-rainbow-476208 quote: Out with the old (legal criminals) and in with the new (independent power). Like this: http://www.groundreport.com/Arts_and_Culture/Demand-Honest-Currency Here: http://gas2.org/2008/10/16/chinese-company-unveils-solar-powered-car-for-5560/ quote: Here: http://www.treehugger.com/files/2008/10/solar-power-satellite.php quote: And back to the old stuff here: http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/oct/17/executivesalaries-banking quote: |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/422.html Survival of the fittest was not Darwin's discovery. See: Herbert Spencer http://cepa.newschool.edu/het/profiles/spencer.htm Why do people believe in falsehood? |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/natural_resources/article4965242.ece
Does anyone else find the above data to be somewhat innacurate? Look here: http://www.allbusiness.com/north-america/united-states-alaska/923787-1.html
And here: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0DXP/is_/ai_n14923269 Detailed statistics tables: imports of crude oil and petroleum products: PAD products More data: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCZC4GTEPkg&feature=related http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=david+blume+oil+price&emb=0&aq=f# |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://gas2.org/2008/10/23/uk-starts-worlds-largest-algae-biofuel-initiative/
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,586315,00.htmlDozens of world leaders are gathered in Beijing for the Asia-Europe summit this week. The question on everyone's mind is: Will China cooperate in facing down the global financial crisis? Anyone, One of my fictional works (a small essay) has been published here: http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1117819/helium3.html?cat=44 The Chinese took over space early in the 21 century because their leadership had invested for the long haul. That long haul brought Helium-3 to China from the moon. Having deftly defending against The West's Imperial Crimes of Aggression, by playing the money game better and forcing The West to withdrawal from Iraq, and the boarder of Iran, the Chinese gained control of Global Oil and Credit. The power taken from The Dollar Hegemony fueled the Chinese effort to mine the new energy source from the moon: Helium-3. The last great leaders of The West: The NeoCons had ruined the American economy during their criminal reign of terror. Once the flow of political power transferred and once Helium-3 entered the Chinese economy the Chinese never looked back. There was no longer any need for the tortured and false history polluted into being by the twisted minds of the Western Legal Criminals, their power evaporated in the Big Dollar Crash that led to the new age of prosperity for all who commanded the wisdom to join in Human Power Independence. Oil, Dollars, and the Major Media Falsehood Factories were out, like an old shoe, and the new age of accurate reason commenced. The Helium age erupted with brilliance never before seen in human time. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://cleantechnica.com/2008/10/25/mit-energy-storage-discovery-could-lead-to-unlimited-solar-power/Researchers at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) have discovered a new way of storing energy from sunlight that could lead to ‘unlimited’ solar power. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/nov/27/renewableenergy-energy
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://sitekreator.com/dmoney/index.html
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://informationclearinghouse.info/article22075.htmTaking the US as the example, the following course of action would seem prudent:
Last edited on Tue Feb 24th, 2009 10:59 am by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.mint.com/blog/finance-core/china-vs-united-states-a-visual-comparison/ |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Harvest Green: Vertical Farm by Romses Architects wins Competition |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.wsws.org/articles/2001/oct2001/tal1-o24.shtml
Power produced into a state of oversupply will reduce the price of power while purchasing power increases because power reduces the cost of production. Why use the word "energy" when the more accurate word is: POWER? Last edited on Sun May 10th, 2009 01:18 pm by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=anvHhN4CqQOE http://www.smh.com.au/environment/china-india-go-with-the-wind-as-fossils-dwindle-20090604-bx8r.html Power-Independence |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/magazine/17-07/mf_freer
The underlying products can be free to almost everybody because the underlying costs are asymptotically approaching zero. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/asymptotically A line whose distance to a given curve tends to zero. An asymptote may or may not intersect its associated curve Joe’s Law: Power produced into a state of over-supply (abundance) reduces the price of power while purchasing power increases because power reduces the cost of production (asymptotically). Question: Who defines economy as "Choice under scarcity" Answer: Not me. Economy is the science of producing more than consumption. I think the "choice under scarcity" definition is false on purpose and false from the "capitalist" doctrine which can be traced back to at least Carl Menger who wrote: “every individual will attempt to secure his own requirements as completely as possible to the exclusion of others.” Carl Menger (1840 -1921) To falsify the meaning of economy in this manner, it seems to me, is akin to falsifying Darwinism to mean "the survival of the fittest" as the same thing as "Kill or be killed"; when the true meaning is that the "fittest" are the ones best able to cooperate voluntarily, to reproduce, to nurture, to produce more than consumption. See this? The obsession with "saving" and "interest rates must be high" etc. is part of the capitalist dogma that fails to see the truth of economy (to produce more than consumption). If you listen to the video in the link at the top of the page you can begin to see Joe's Law as a more accurate perspective on economy. Abundance is the natural result of economy, not a managed scarcity. A managed scarcity can be exemplified with typical capitalist dogma. For example: a price can be increased when production is throttled down to cause the product to be scarce on purpose. That is a natural result of capitalist dogma, to make things scarce on purpose, to manage scarcity on purpose, for profit. The sick part of this false dogma is its inherent short term gains at the expense of long term benefits; particularly when capitalist dogma is employed in the production of power, into a state of scarcity, such as the production of oil, for one example, or food, for another example, so as to profit by that managed scarcity as that managed scarcity increases demand and increases profits where wealth flows from the those who need oil and food to those who manage that scarcity with their capitalist methods of false dogma. Words are not deeds, don't blame me for scarce food supplies and scarce power supplies, I'm the guy who found Joe's Law - remember? Power produced into a state of oversupply (abundance) reduces the price of power (asymptotically) while purchasing power (money purchasing power) increases because power reduces the cost of production (asymptotically). Last edited on Tue Jun 23rd, 2009 12:20 pm by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://tinyurl.com/njbjseWired Editor-in-Chief Chris Anderson on the Future of Free Not so fast dude. Please, dear reader, consider the following quote from the link above and then please consider learning from history so as not to repeat the major errors. I'll explain after the quote: Back in the late 1800s there was some theorizing…this was at the dawn of economics. Economics, dear reader, began with human thought. What the speaker above is referring to is "capitalism", and you can hear how his error is confessed as you listen to the speech. When a person considers waking up or staying in bed, a modern bed or a bed made of animal fur in the Stone Age, the economy of the decision is thought out by the human being. I’m concerned about placing credit where credit is due, and I ‘m concerned about accurate transfers of data. Please know that the speaker, although his message is full of accurate data, please know that he is mistaking the social science of economy with “capitalism”. Capitalism is the management of scarcity and capitalism is a pricing scheme where the price is purposefully “pegged” at “that which the market will bear”, so please, dear reader, do not make the same mistake as the speaker. Please don’t perpetuation this myth. Economy is not “capitalism”. Capitalism is not economy. Here are two economic studies that pre-date “the dawn of economics”, and the first is more than merely talk, as the inventor of this earlier economic study also proved his “theory” with real time experimentation. http://tmh.floonet.net/pdf/jwarren.pdf That is Equitable Commerce by Josiah Warren The date of that publication is 1952. Josiah Warren describes the inherent stupidity of the capitalist pricing scheme, as a short term small gain for a few “capitalist” at the expense of a larger long term loss for everyone including the few “capitalists”. Words are not deeds, and again Josiah Warren proved his “theory” on economy with deeds. Next up is a proponent of Josiah Warren’s economic study and practices where Stephen Pearl Andrews re-writes and expands upon “Equitable Commerce” with his version called: “The Science of Society”. http://anarchism.net/scienceofsociety.htm So, for the record, the economic study that has dawned in the late 1800s was and continues to be “Capitalism” which is a failed economic model of “choice under scarcity” where the pricing choice is to price based upon “that which the market will bear”. That is and was “capitalism”.
Please do not follow the model of mistaken identity where the “founders” of economics are falsely identified as those early capitalists like Carl Menger who wrote this: “every individual will attempt to secure his own requirements as completely as possible to the exclusion of others.” Carl Menger (1840 -1921) I like this better: "Responsibility must be Individual, or there is no responsibility at all." Josiah Warren (1852) This is also worth considering: "Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance." George Bernard Shaw Last edited on Tue Jun 23rd, 2009 12:15 pm by Joe Kelley |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://thearchdruidreport.blogspot.com/2009/06/thermodynamic-economy.html
Put another way: Power produced into a state of oversupply decreases the price of power while purchasing power increases because power reduces the cost of production. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://lewrockwell.com/schmidt/schmidt18.1.html
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.mint.com/blog/trends/how-money-finds-its-way-into-the-economy/
That is bull...shit. Interest charged by someone who pays no interest is an easy to explain abuse of power, it is crime, it is legal crime. These are words, these are words that have no power, people have power. Some people, call them "The Fed", have the power to add zeros to their own personal accounts. If you believe the words published on that OHHHH SOOOO official looking link, and you prefer not to believe that sentence above, then please take a moment and look in the mirror and ask yourself this question: "When will I take back my power to perceive accurately from those who stole that power?" Here is the sentence again (that you may or may not believe to be true, while you may or may not believe the bullshit published in the link to be true): Some people, call them "The Fed", have the power to add zeros to their own personal accounts. Suppose that you went into the bathroom and you asked yourself the question concerning your power to see clearly and then suppose that you decided to use your brain to see what may be true in that sentence I offer to you. Suppose that these people, call them The Fed, add millions of zeros to their personal accounts, millions of zeros, because the keyboard stuck, or some other excuse. They now have a lot of zeros in their account no? Yes? When is one zero too many zeros? When is the number of zeros not enough zeros in their personal accounts? What do they want? What do they want to buy? They already have the power to add zeros to their personal accounts so they don't have to buy that power from someone. It is already their power, and it is not your power, not legally your power. What happens if you want to add zeros to your account? You have to pay them. They don't have to pay you. Why do you not have that deal? Why do they have that deal and not you? What makes them so special? I have the accurate answer. They are criminals. You are a victim. If you refuse to see things in that way, then you work for them - without pay. Good luck with that, it leads to torture and mass murder as those people buy what they need to keep that power. You may end up pushing less powerful people in front of you on the line to the torture chambers on that path. You may end up digging the mass graves. You may end up being tortured as you torture other people, being murdered as you murder other people and if you think I'm the one "on crack", then ask yourself what happens to your wealth when your zeros on your account are transfered to a government employee who is at this moment torturing someone for profit. You bought it, hook, line, and sinker. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
I have been on another forum where the forum operators allow personal attacks to continue despite polite requests made by the targeted victim, me, to stop. Here is that forum: http://www.campaignforliberty.com/forums/viewtopic.php?topic=2329 Anyone interested in reading the data linked must register. That is the way it goes. Having suffered though much of the personal attacks, and having persisted in defense, and having continued to offer data at the site, it has come to a point, now, where I see the need to expand my coverage from that exclusive site to other places, like this site, my site. Here the moderator is me, I can take any action requested by any fellow forum member into consideration and act or not act accordingly, and I can explain my actions, and I an fall back on previous pre-emptive declarations concerning what I intend to do with people who attack fellow forum members with their pre-meditated personal attacks. The subject matter, here and now, the data, the incoming information, the stuff that will be processed, commented on, understood, questioned, perceived, and digested includes Power and Independence and it includes a filter by which the data will be seen through, and that filter is Joe’s law (and equitable commerce). The first source of data is a web link here: http://www.alternet.org/world/139983/pipeline-istan:_everything_you_need_to_know_about_oil,_gas,_russia,_china,_iran,_afghanistan_and_obama/ Here is the tinyurl link: http://tinyurl.com/ydphosk Here is the title: Pipeline-Istan: Everything You Need to Know About Oil, Gas, Russia, China, Iran, Afghanistan and Obama Here is a relevant quote: Now, it's time to grasp just what the Asian Energy Security Grid is all about, visit a surreal natural gas republic, and understand why that Grid is so deeply implicated in the Af-Pak war. The idea here, now, is to make sense of the current events that may lead the human species toward or away from extinction. In order to understand what I mean by that last warning, that last opportunity, that last sentence I see the need to link another data stream. Here: http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2009/09/asteroid-impacts-are-the-biggest-threat-to-advanced-life-in-the-galaxy-stephen-hawking.html Here is the Tinyurl: http://tinyurl.com/y9y696x Here is the title: "Asteroid Impacts are the Biggest Threat to Advanced Life in the Milky Way" -Stephen Hawking (The Weekend Feature) Here is a quote:
Here, and now, it is my opportunity to connect the dots. If the power that is available to the human species is consumed by legal criminals who are hell bent on “eliminating the competition” (their true motive), then less power is consumed in the process of insuring or ensuring the survival of the species against the number one threat (or perhaps legal crime is the true number one threat). I have personal power; but my person power must now be spent ensuring my own survival, so this side job must be put off. Please consider reading both links and connect the dots if you can, it may be a good thing to do, you will have to be the judge, such is the nature of our species – we are individual examples. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/722.html#I It doesn't work if everyone is in on it. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Below is a series of links linking news items that tell a story by their connection. First is a hidden news item where the people who are best able to profit from the secrecy are the people who are currently running an organized crime ring called "The Dollar Hegemony" - these people profit from their power to print dollars at will, and spend dollars at will, for as long as the fraud remains covered in secrecy. First up is an exposure of the fraud in progress as some of the victims of the fraud are taking steps toward removing the power behind the fraud. My words may not ring true, and the reader could spend some effort at accurately identifying why my words don't ring true, rather than suffering from some conditioned response. I can't make someone understand no more than I can make a person drink poison when a person is conditioned to think that the truth is poison. Here is the first link: http://www.worldreports.org/news/251_47_trillion_lien_against_U.S._treasury_and_fed The reader who scoffs at that link may find reasonable cause to judge the simple truth of it, with slight effort, rather than merely jerking the knee. At some point the holders of debt notes know that the borrower can't pay, the amount owed becomes excessive. Promises of paying back what is borrowed become as empty as the moral conscience of these torturing mass murderers who run these organized crime rings (The Fed). If the reader is willing to entertain the possibility that the crime ring (The Fed or The Dollar Hegemony) is being busted, being "justified", having their credit cards cut, etc., then the next link could be connected to the first link, with some effort. http://www.lewrockwell.com/sardi/sardi138.html That is a conservative link, a source from which capitalists are known to gather, a republican type of world view, a free market perspective, and an economical viewpoint. Note the quote: Unable to create a level competitive field for banking, the bank reform effort has now shifted away from cooperation to a master plan to take down the world’s economies and exercise complete control in the aftermath by introduction of a master plan to control banking and currency. Complexity works in favor of the organized criminals since their victims are confused, shocked and awed, and rendered power-less - unable to defend themselves. That brings this effort to link 3, where people figure out how to defend themselves and do so without sustained warfare, without legalized violence on a torturous and mass murderous scale: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article24219.htm Note how the defenders are blamed for defending themselves, by whom? Who, and who exactly, blames innocent victims for defending themselves? Which brings this effort to the 4th link: http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/754.html When faced with an overwhelming power of destruction there must be a greater power of defense or the inevitable result will be. Here is a path to ponder: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article24217.htm However, if they still refuse to lend money, additional measures could be taken. The government could take over the banks and run them as public utilities. The only losers here would be the billionaire shareholders. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.lewrockwell.com/spl2/tech-wish-list.html
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/800.html The bottom line there can be measure with a very simple power formula. Power invested is divided into power produced. If the result is more, rather than less, power: then what is the bottom line? Answer: More Power |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/venezuelas-hugo-chavez-declares-energy-crisis/article1461041/
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.consumerenergyreport.com/2010/02/15/saudi-energy-adviser-alarmed-about-peak-oil-pushes-for-diversified-economy/ Peak Oil Demand |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://gas2.org/2010/05/20/back-to-the-future-a-revolutionary-1000-ev-with-battery-swap-tech-and-a-100-mile-range/ Killers? |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article25550.htmOf course, most Americans don't earn $1 million a year. In fact 9.9 percent earn nothing because they are unemployed. It's a shame that we have wasted that $1 trillion on war, rather than on a WPA-style program to repair our roads and bridges that could have hired those 15.3 million people out of work for $50,000 apiece. And on top of that, we would still have had a cool $235 billion left over to invest in clean energy, producing 3.9 million green jobs while reducing our reliance on fossil fuels, according to a study by the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. Joe's Law applied: Power (1 trillion dollars is Purchasing Power) produced into a state of oversupply (Borrowed/Printed/Stolen - whatever) reduces the price of power (In this case the interest rate goes down, which is the price of money, because too much money has been Borrowed/Printed/Stolen) while purchasing power increases (in this case where purchasing power is spent the factor of what the purchasing power buys is significant) because power reduces the cost of production (in this case the cost of printing is in view, and so convoluted, ambiguous, and able to render stupification, that a book is needed to explain the cost reduction phenomenon - think in terms of "how stupid are we now" and "why"). Now replace the factor of money with the two examples of power purchases: A. Road Maintenance B. Investing in power production (renewable) Power (road maintenance) produced into a state of oversupply (spending almost 1 trillion on this could be an example of oversupply, even as bad the roads may appear at this time) reduces the price of power (too much road maintenance reduces the price of road maintenance, as too much of anything will reduce the price of it) while purchasing power increases (again, in this case, the factor of investment or “that which the power to purchase is employed toward” must be known in order to find the actual change of purchasing power resulting from this production of power where purchasing power is employed toward road maintenance, think: “is the power to transport a net increase in power or is the power to transport not a net increase in power”) because power reduces the cost of production (again: “are the roads truly, and accurately reducing the cost of transportation?”). If in case A (Road Maintenance) the net production of transportation power (less costly transportation gained by the expense of money), then purchasing power increases. If in case A the net cost of money (purchasing power) did not increase the power to transport, then the net change in “that which a dollar will buy” is higher, not lower – because the net change in power (to transport) was negative. How much easier is it to know, and know accurately, how case B (renewable “energy” = power) manages to increase real power, decrease the actual cost of power, increase the net ability to purchase with one unit of money (purchasing power), and lower the cost of producing power? Joe’s Law applied to 1 trillion dollars of purchasing power spent entirely on renewable energy: Power produced into a state of oversupply (Wind turbines, Solar Panels, Modular Green House Food and Algae Fuel units, Electric Cars, etc.) decreases the price of power (as more and more of renewable products flood the market, 1 trillion dollars worth in this case, the price per product will decrease, as does every other thing that is produced into a state of abundance) while purchasing power increases (these things actually, really, truly, and accurately reduce the cost of production so therefore these things actually do, really do, truly do, and accurately do cause an increase in “that which the dollar unit will buy”, or, in one word: deflation) because power reduces the cost of production (Solar panels already reduce the cost of producing electricity, electric cars cost 2 cents per mile of cost, already, compared to 10 cents per mile for gasoline powered cars). |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
If the general investing public ever perceives that the Federal Reserve is about to launch a new program of mass inflation, one which is comparable to what it did in October of 2008, then investors will begin looking for historic inflation hedges. Commodities have historically increased in price during times of mass inflation. This especially includes gold and silver. It has also included oil. http://www.lewrockwell.com/north/north890.html |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article26604.htm
|
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Obsolete coal While watching this report I thought of 2 relevant comments. Comment 1 CO2 is what Algae consumes, and during the process of producing Algae based motor fuel there is a ratio of CO2 consumed in the process compared to the fuel produced in the process. X amount of CO2 is consumed for Y amount of fuel produced when Algae is used for making motor fuel. Do the readers know that motor fuel is made by sugar, corn, and other plants on this planet now? I know this is a fact. Do the readers know that Algae can replace sugar, corn, and other plants as the stock used in the process of making motor fuel? Do the readers know that Algae made motor fuel can cost much less per gallon to make compared to the already used sugar, corm, and other plant made motor fuels? CO2 is consumed during Algae motor fuel production. CO2 is the waste product of Coal motor fuel production. Do readers know this stuff? Comment 1a Do readers know that moonshiners once made their own motor fuel? Comment 2 Do readers know that coal was once used in the mass production of Military Aircraft fuel? Yes, that is a fact, a well known, well documented fact, that coal was used to make high power fighter aircraft fuel. The process by which coal is used to make motor fuel is already known by mankind, it has already existed, it has already been used in human history. Do the readers know this fact? The report linked at the top of the page appears to suggest that reasonable people who want to stop pollution are up against greedy people who want to profit from things that pollute - and pass on the costs of pollution to everyone, including the greedy people. The report doesn't connect many of the dots associated with this subject matter, coal, CO2, motor fuel, profits, costs, etc. Joe's Law helps. When power is produced into a state of oversupply the price of power reduces while purchasing power increases because power reduces the cost of production. If coal production is against the law, who is behind such a thing? Really? |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
More for less The greater the power of falsehood, it seems to me, the less will be the required power of violence; when the goal is domination, enslavement, control, subjugation, and exploitation. In that report the reader can now know, if they have not known up to this point, that Oil has been the goal in the middle east, not spreading democracy, not fighting communism, and not preventing puppet dictators from turning against their masters with the dreaded weapons of mass destruction provided to them by their former employers. Part II In that second part of that report there is a reference made by which the message appears to be such that no enemies exist, and I'll quote the words and let the reader judge the meaning independently. ...and now the Soviet Union is gone and we have the lack of this existential threat that he was worried about and the Cold War. Look HERE From there: The clash in South Ossetia was a valuable lesson for Putin who had hoped that US/Russia relations would gradually thaw. Now he knows that's not possible. When another nation kills your people, everything changes. Each side becomes more inflexible and the prospects for peace dim. At the same time, US strategic objectives in Central Asia haven't changed at all, so Putin must prepare for the next confrontation. That's why he's strengthening alliances that challenge US dominance in the region and in the world. That's why he's looking for opportunities to weaken US power and erode US prestige. That's why he wants to dump the dollar. It's all preparation. How does it work for you to wish away something harmful, perhaps a cold, how about a dent in your new car, an unwanted pregnancy, a unfaithful spouse? You wish, you wish, you wish, and let me know how that remedy works for you? Conflicts are required by dictators; that is the source of their power. See if the following makes sense to you, please don't wish this away: Putin and George Bush were supposedly good friends, but US-Russian relations have steadily deteriorated since February 10, 2007 when Putin gave a speech at a conference in Munich. Now look here, and these are two links that go together like a hammer and an anvil, one must have the other, or the work doesn't - work. 1 1 1 + 1 = something that doesn't go away as a result of wishes. Wish in one hand, defecate in the other, which hand fills up first? A survivor of the Battan Death March, my friend, knew the importance of that question. If peace exists for an extended period of time on this planet there will no longer be a demand for dictators; and they know it. Power flowing abundantly, everyone has it, makes the price insignificant. What power do these people have over their victims? One more quote from the report and one more comment from me. home grown energy Please use your own brain when reading my next comment. There is no physical limit to stop every person on the planet from becoming fully capable of producing all their own power at home. What would happen, and what will happen, once that is the norm? Each person eliminates the home heating bill, the home cooling bill, the home water pumping/filtering bill, and the home food bill, and added to that reduction in the cost of living, each person eliminates their transportation fuel costs, each person on the planet. What happens when every person on the planet no longer has to work longer hours, more days of the year, just to pay those bills? Do some math. How much do you pay to heat your home every year? How much do you pay to cool your home every year? How much do you pay for food every year? How much do you pay for water every year? How much do you pay for transportation fuel every year? Get that number, and compare to my rough number here: 10,000 USD That is a rough but easy number for quick and easy math. Now multiply that by the number of human beings on the planet Earth. 10,000 times 6 billion 10,000 6,000,000,000 = 60,000,000,000,000 Per year The reason for me commenting in this way may not be clear to you, as you question my authority on matters of political economy, is to reason with you concerning REAL reality, not the false reality force feed into you since birth. The people who cause wars do so because failure to do so will transfer power from them to the millions of people who are their victims, and that very simple math problem above is meant to show you a score board that can be realized by the victims once the victims break the chains that bind them to the legal criminals who victimize the victims on purpose, for profit, or just for fun. Here is the score board created by the legal criminals: http://www.usdebtclock.org/ Wishing that away, doesn't work, yet that score board is nothing, absolutely baseless, without any substance whatsoever, the moment enough people decide to stop it at once, in one instance, on one day, it no longer has any power what-so-ever. Falsehood is a power used by legal criminals in the work of exploiting their targeted victims, seen as a benefit on one end of the stick, and not so on the smelly end. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Desperate Power Struggle It isn't a story about dependence or independence between people, so much as it is a dependence people have on the concept of justice, or equity, as people seek to remain alive by cooperating with each other on a daily basis. The link reports current news of people who become desperate as a direct result of powerful forces of nature. Read the report and then imagine your own life becoming a desperate struggle for power, do this chore along with me; so as to understand what I mean with my opening sentence above. Imagine that your life suddenly changes from what it is now to a beginning moment on a beginning day whereby electric power, natural gas, water, food, and communication stops flowing to you, and this situation lasts for some time - it is morning, you just wake up, you are freezing, hungry, dirty, and thirsty. You want to turn up the thermostat, but heat does not flow into the house. You want to cook some food, but the refrigerator is empty, and the stove doesn't work. You want to take a shower, but the water is freezing cold, and then that water stops flowing out of the shower head. You want try to get a drink before the water stops flowing but you see it all go down the drain instead. You first struggle to reconnect to the flow of information and much to your regret you find out that you are not alone in your desperate situation, it turns out that the whole city your home resides within has no power either, everyone else will soon wake up to the cold hard facts on that morning too. That is news. You find out that news, and you know it is true - hypothetically. What happens when everyone else in the city knows what you know too? What happens when everyone else wakes up too? That happening, when everyone else knows what you know too, is the first connection, and it is a just, or it is an equitable connection, everyone knows, and everyone knows that everyone else in the city is disconnected from electric power, natural gas power, gasoline power for cars, food power, and water power, no one has any, and everyone is equally desperate in that city, by that force of nature, that calamity, and that clear and present danger. Shift your view, from that scene, and imagine a city nearby, and in that city nearby things are different. Everyone in your city knows this fact too, that things are different in the next city. All the people in your desperate city are without power now, except one power, the power of knowing that all the people in the next city are different. How different? In the next city there are families in homes that can be exemplified by four homes you know about; whereby the first home is a home that has solar panels on top of the garage roof, and there are many solar panels, more solar panels than needed for that one home, enough solar panels for more than two homes - just in case. When there is too much electricity, the home owner sells excess. The home next to the solar panel home is a home that has solar panels on the roof of the green house where the family grows food and algae with a new vertical farming method. They also have enough solar panels for more than two homes, just in case. When they produce too much food, they make algae instead, or sell food, or sell algae. The third home has no solar panels, it has a well to pump water though, and a storage tank to store water, just in case, and a filtering system, and a need for power to pump the water high up in the air, so gravity can keep the water flowing, and just in case the electric power stops flowing from the neighbors: this home owner also has an emergency generator that will run as long as the water in the tank flows down through the turbine wheel. When the water tank is full: they sell water. The fourth home has a garage where the home owner takes raw algae and turns it into gasoline for vehicles and emergency generators and that fuel is stored in tanks when too much gasoline is produced over and above current consumption, the process of turning algae into fuel requires electric power, so this home has solar panels sufficient for one home and one algae fuel operation. When the tanks are full, they sell motor fuel. The four homes are typical in this city, next to your city, and everyone in your city knows this fact. Did the people in your city invest in bullets, instead? Go back to that morning, before everyone else wakes up, and imagine that everyone else in your city are about to wake up to the cold hard facts on this new hypothetical day, and imagine that you are the only one who knows about the city next you your city. What do you tell your fellow citizens if your fellow citizens have invested only in violence as a means of gaining necessary power, and what do they tell you about the cold hard facts, the real news? Power produced into oversupply reduces the price of power while purchasing power increases because power reduces the cost of production. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/25/business/energy-environment/25coal.html?_r=1Balking at the high price of coal that fuels much of China’s electricity grid, the nation’s state-owned utility companies are defying government economic planners by deliberately reducing the amount of electricity they produce. Anyone, In whose best interest is it to govern down, to slow down, to decrease, or to limit the production of power? Know, please, Joe's Law. Power produced into oversupply reduces the price of power while purchasing power increases (deflation, or more bang for the buck) because power reduces the cost of production. Everybody wins when the power supply reaches abundance. Who wins when the power supply is deliberately throttled down to a state of scarcity? There is only one logical answer to the question that asks who wins, in whose best interest, is power governed down, slowed down, to a level of scarcity, on purpose? This happens to also be the same answer as the question that asks who profits from aggressive wars for profit? The evidence happens to follow the same path to the same source. A monopoly producer has a vested interest in throttling down the supply of power to a level of scarcity so as to increase the price of power to whatever the monopoly market will bear, and if people must have power to survive, which they must, then people will pay any price, or suffer, or die. If competition exists: the competitor who throttles down power, below demand, so as to jack up the price, will lose the market share that competitor had won, once, as the customers choose to buy power from the supplier who does not govern down the power supply to a level of scarcity. Competition does not force a monopoly power into existence, the opposite is true: competition ends monopoly power. Look at the link at the top of the page. Know the facts. Don't believe the lies. Lies are produced for reasons. Lies do not occur by accident. You are targeted. You will be exploited. Stop being a victim. Know the truth instead. The utilities’ go-slow tactics include curtailing the planned expansion and construction of power plants, and running plants for fewer hours a day. And in a notable act of passive defiance, the power companies have scheduled an unusually large number of plants to close for maintenance this summer — right when air-conditioning season will reach its peak. A go-slow tactic can't work in a free market, go-slow tactics can't work to the benefit of the competitor who willfully reduces production below demand so as to increase the price as a result of enforced scarcity, not in a free market, because another competitor, absent the enforced monopoly which cannot enforce a state of scarcity, competitively fills in the demand with increased production as the go-slow tactic is tried, and the go-slow tactic fails, as the go-slow tactic is attempted by the failing competitor. Why is what I am reporting news to anyone? Who has been duped? Raise your hand. If you, the reader, can't see this, then that doesn't mean that you are right, and accurate, and reasonable, if you conclude that Joe Kelley is wrong, because you say so, and the official journalist who wrote the article above is right - just because you say so. Children also cover their eyes to make themselves invisible, it doesn't work, reality doesn't work that childish way. I can give you a very good example of a similar situation here in California. For a time that spans over a decade I've been working toward the power producing business, running into difficulties, and while working on this path one difficulty has been a law that protects the monopoly electric power companies, or the power cartel here in California, whereby any home power, by any home owner, sent into The Grid is consumed by other people, and paid for by other people, but the money went to the monopoly power companies, and the money didn't go to the home owner who produced excess power into The Grid. That law has just changed. Now anyone, as far as I know at this time, can double their investment in Solar Panels, or Wind Power Generators, or anything under the sun that hooks up to The Grid, and reap handsome rewards for that larger investment, such as a doubling of investment to be willfully twice the power the investor needs to consume his, or her, self. The single investment is to use money to begin making the required electricity at home, just enough Solar Panels to meet the home demand for electricity, and the doubling of the single investment is to produce a steady income, actual checks in the mail, money to be cashed, or money to be deposited into a savings account, or money to be invested, each month, flowing from the consumers of the electricity that you produce, then flowing to the no-longer-monopoly power company. and then those payments for the surplus electricity you produce, at home, is sent as a check printed by the power company, to you, because you produced the power that was consumed by the consumer. That is news. I offer you news. You prefer something else? What do you prefer? If there is a demand for lies, what will be produced? In the past the power companies kept any power you made in excess of the power you consumed, and they sell your power. Now, as far as I know so far, if you produce more power than you consume, the power company send you a check in the mail for that additional power they sell for you. I can go into great detail about how this type of thing bridges the gap between capitalist and socialist dogma, but that is another story. Back to the report about China: This time, the impasse between government and industry is not the only cause of China’s electricity shortages. Surging electricity demand is also a factor. Who runs whatever power is the power that enforces a monopoly? That question must be answered accurately, if the idea is to know anything about this topic. What stops every single person on the planet from borrowing enough credit (their own good faith and credit = borrowing from themselves) to buy enough solar panels to produce twice as much power as they alone can ever use, and then sell the excess power so as to generate an income, to pay back the loan, with a modest interest charged to the borrower and sent to the loan producers? You don't know the answer. You have never even heard the question. The knee jerk reaction is to cry, scream, or shout, no, just no, first, then more that no, as you recover control of your own mind. No, Joe, you are stupid for asking such an asinine question, stupid Joe. Stupid, stupid, Joe. You are so, incredibly, stupid, Joe. Who do yo think you are, Joe? The point is: I have nothing whatsoever to do with the question, and the knee jerk reaction measures your level of brain-washing. Either you ask, and then answer, the question, or you are programmed to ignore it, your behavior has be so modified as to be conditioned to respond to such questions with immediate focus of attention upon the messenger, going right past the message, and targeting the messenger instead of focusing on the message. If the shoe fits, you wear the shoe, cause it fits, not because I have reported go you that you are wearing the shoe. I have nothing to do with message. The message is the message, I am just me. If modern culture was the same culture as past culture in America, then Paul Revere would have been stoned to death, verbally, for the audacious crime of having rode through town yelling "The British are coming!". Stupid Paul. What power stops anyone from borrowing from their own good faith and credit so as to begin producing the electric power they need at home and doubling that investment so as to begin generating an income at home, so as to pay off the loan, and pay off a modest rate of interest that is sent back to the people who produce and maintain the loan account? Ignore that question. Do as you are trained to do, focus on me, target me, blame me, read from the script, and obey. Measure the problem, define the problem, yourself, by blaming me. Anyone anywhere on the planet Earth is now a potential competitor in the power producing industry - if you can see this happening - absent the force that stops this from happening. What stops the supply of power from meeting the demand for power anywhere on Earth? You can ignore the question, and you can focus your attention on the messenger instead, if that is what you allow yourself to do, by some force of external will power. What happened to your own power of will? You were born with one, what happened to it? The question isn't complex. The question is simple. The answer is simple. The information that is available to answer the question is abundant. What is OPEC? What stops the supply of power from reaching the demand for power anywhere on Earth? What is The Dollar Hegemony? What is Purchasing Power? Can you get as much Purchasing Power as you demand? What stops you from getting as much Purchasing Power as you demand? I'll return to the report on China (filled with official lies, half-truths, and confused, and irrational, viewpoints): In Yiyang, a town of 360,000 in south-central China, electricity shortages are so severe this spring that many homes and businesses receive power only one day in three. Even gasoline stations in this region are silent more days than not, because the pumps lack electricity. One of the things I write about, along the lines of my on-line presidential campaign, is the written documentation of two specific legal financial instruments, whereby these two things are meant to compete with, and dominate, the world reserve currency market, to take over as the dominate world reserve currency, in a very short time, and without possibility of usurpation, without ever being challenged effectively by any other monetary competitor, because these two products would be, for the foreseeable future, the highest quality money, at the lowest possible cost, and I'm not selling snake oil. I am reporting the facts. Competition in money markets will force money higher in quality and lower in cost, and my product 1 and product 2 offering illustrates one form that money could move toward, to illustrate the point that competition will force money higher in quality and lower in cost, once monopoly is no longer the power in forced. You can see the facts too. Can you see past the lies? In Yiyang, a town of 360,000 in south-central China, electricity shortages are so severe this spring that many homes and businesses receive power only one day in three. Even gasoline stations in this region are silent more days than not, because the pumps lack electricity. If you have read the article linked at the top of the page, and if you have arrived at the quote just quoted above, and you are at a level of understanding at this point, then please consider employing the concept of these two new legal financial products offered to anyone on the planet, while your conscious attention is focused upon this specific power struggle. Product 1 offers anyone who does not have a history of bad credit, or anyone with a history of good credit, a home and/or business property mortgage at no interest charged to the borrower. Effectively, measurably, and accurately, product 1 credits people who deserve credit, which cannot be argued against, not without resort to deceit, not without resort to threats of violence, and not without resort to use of violence as a means of discrediting the idea, and the actions, on this path. Credit those who earn credit. In whose interest is it not to do so? Product one allows those who earn credit to use their earned credit to buy, specifically, a loan, at no interest, for a new home, or a loan to buy off an existing loan (at high interest), or a new business property, at no interest charged to the borrower, who borrows from his, or her, own good faith and credit, that he, or she, earns him, or her, self. The two product idea stems from Joe's Law. Joe's Law is my earnings to date, in the form of one sentence. Why are those who earn credit not getting the credit they deserve? Why is power governed down to a state of scarcity? What is stopping the production of power from meeting the demand for power? Product one is my product of willful power used in the work of answering specific questions; questions that are typically left unanswered, because the specialists who are supposed to be answering these questions just so happen to be the same people who are willfully causing power to be governed down to a state of scarcity, because they profit by that willful act, and they profit at the expense of the powerless. Product 1 is purchased by one person in China, then two, then three, and Product 1 is not purchased by anyone in America, because product 1 is against the law in America; what happens? If you don't like the answer, then reverse the question. Product 1 is purchased by half the population in America. Product 1 is against the law in China. What happens? Half the population of America now has their monthly mortgage payments on their homes and on their business properties cut in half. Each month half the population of America has roughly 500 units of more money each month, Power to Purchase, to spend, to invest, or to save, compared to the case of reality whereby product 1 is against the law, the way thing are now. What happens to the power supply in America? The entire tax paying population in America, not the big corporations, they don't pay taxes, the actual honest productive tax paying people in America, send their surplus power to the monopoly bank cartel, in the form of interest payments, so as to have that money spent buying politicians to look the other way while financial fraud is perpetrated, and then, when financial fraud injures the victims, get this clear in your head, the money you send, is then spent on rewarding the criminals with trillion dollar bail outs, as a reward for injuring you. That is the true story of how things work in America. Measure that reality. Things can get worse. If China takes over as The World Reserve Currency Monopoly Power, how will that change be measured by you? When power is even more scarce in America, more scarce in America than it is in China, including clean air power, will you listen then, will you be powerful enough to do anything about it then? Product 2 is a 1 percent interest loan offered to anyone on the planet, and this can easily be done electronically, through an effective, competitive, on-line web based, encrypted, backed-up, and well maintained, and well scrutinized, system of accurate accounting, and done by way of license, and done competitively, by competing franchises, new franchises, or existing franchises, like E-Bay, Skype, Amazon, Microsoft, or even any open source competitor, whereby the accounting franchises maintain their own market share competitively. The accounting franchises offer product 1, and product 2, to customers, as specified, according to the specifications of product 1, and product 2, and anyone, anywhere, can buy product 1, or product 2, on-line, and begin employing their own power of credit, that they earn. Product 2 charges 1 percent interest so as to make a profit for the accounting franchises, so as to cover the cost of accounting, as the franchises account for the flow of power realized in the production and use of product 1 and product 2, as time goes by. Product 2, according to specifications, are loans sold and then used in the effort to make more power, such as a loan that is used to buy Solar Panels, or Electric Cars, or Modular Vertical Farming Units, or Wind Mills, to name a few possible power producers that could be specified on product 2 loans. The specifications that must be met are calculations that confirm a net increase in power over and above the power spent on the thing purchased. The Solar Panel exemplifies the concept for product 2. But first a borrower may borrow product 1, and cut his, or her, monthly mortgage payment in half. A borrower then has savings each month, or potential investment power each month, or more money to spend each month, thereby creating demand for other people to produce the new things demanded as a result of Product 1 savings. That is product 1 alone. Product 2 pays for itself, even without product 1. Product 2, in the exemplary case of the Solar Panel, allows the purchaser to borrow from his potential income increase realized by the thing purchased with Product 2; because product 2, by design, by specification, produces power, or nets a measured savings. The Product 2 borrower has, for example, a 100 dollar monthly electric bill, a historically accurate average monthly payment of money sent, monthly, to the central power monopoly company, which is known, a known cost, a measured cost average, and that can be cut down by 10% according to known measures today. 100 dollars per month on average, can be cut down by 10% today, by investing in Solar Panels, and that savings is gaining in economic value for many reasons, easily moving to 15% savings, and more, and more savings. Product 2 is then used to buy twice as much power production, an equivalent to 200 dollars per month of electricity to be produced by enough Solar Panels purchased. The Product 2 loan, done this way (but not necessarily done this way), amounts to a lower monthly cost of electricity, less per month paid by the home owner, to pay the loan, 180 dollars per month to pay off the loan, and an income stream of 100 dollars per month, paid to you from The Grid, to spend, or to invest, or to save. You borrow enough to buy 200 dollars worth of electric production monthly, save 10% on each 100 dollars worth of electricity produced, a 180 dollar a month loan payment, you no longer pay 100 dollars a month in electricity, and you receive 100 dollars worth of cash for the 100 dollars a month of electricity you send into The Grid. 180 dollar per month loan payment, you get 100 dollar per month worth of electricity, and you get a 100 dollar check each month. Before investment you spend 100 dollars for 100 dollars worth of power sold on The Grid. After investment you have to pay 180 (an amount that is a rough estimate based upon actual offers by companies who sell you Solar Panels and guarantee a lower electric bill as you pay off the loan for the Solar Panels) per month while you get 100 dollars worth of electricity; 180 minus 100 equals 80. So you pay 80 per month instead of 100 per month for electricity. Cutting the investment in half will reduce your savings down to 10 dollars per month. Investing 4 times as much as you use at home increases your income to 40 dollars per month. It takes money to make money, as the saying goes. If one month you use less electricity, you get a bigger check that month. You use more electricity, you get less electricity per month. Get this concept in your mind, it is important, it is significant. Get it. If you don't get it, ask questions. Do the research. Know the facts. Electric power is power, money is power or it isn't money. Product 2 can be used to buy a car too. When your old car wears out, you need a new one, or you want to start a competitive taxi or delivery business, you buy electric vehicles, you have to pay back the loan, at 1 percent interest, just like you have to pay back the loan for any car purchase, now your interest rate is 1 percent, not 5, not 10, but your new electric car costs you about 80% less in fuel costs, and you make the fuel at home, if you have invested in Solar Panels at home, and/or, at your business property. If you now spend 100 dollars a month on gas, the petroleum stuff, you now spend 18 dollars on electric power for transportation; you add savings to savings. If you started a competitive taxi, or delivery business, you can compete with anyone who also goes into the electric transportation business, as electric converted businesses compete against the petroleum powered competitors who will be paying more than 80% more for transportation fuel; if petroleum fuel prices stay as low as they are, and at 80% more costly compared to electric power prices, per mile. Petroleum prices have to fall significantly before they can compete with electric power prices. Will oil prices fall? Do you understand this, or, instead, does this go right over your head, or do you suffer from the brainwashing, and are you jerking your knee, are you targeting the messenger, instead of focusing your attention on the facts? How about adding up Product 1 and Product 2 as the wave sweeps America and all those who buy into a higher quality and lower cost money system do the following average estimate of savings: 1. $500 dollars saved on home mortgage interest payments per month. 2. $1000 dollars saved on business property mortgage interest payments per month 3. $40 dollars saved, or checks in the mail from The Grid, on Solar Panel (or other) electric power producers at home and work. (farms and rural area wind mills are already going up in California) 4. $80 dollars saved on transportation fuel for those who must upgrade a car anyway, or those who can't afford not to cut down on their petroleum expenses, for whatever reason dreamed up. $1,620 per month for a number of Americans who decide to make use of 2 competitive legal financial products that merely illustrate what can happen when competition in legal money is no longer against the law (criminal law). What if the number of people, who decide not to pay usury, and decide not to pay for oil, etc, is One Hundred Million people out of the total population in American, which is roughly Three Hundred Million people? Just add the number of zeros and arrive at the amount of power that remains in the hands of the productive American population, and arrive at the power that no longer flows into the pyramid scheme that sucks the life blood out of the American Dream. 1620 100,000,000 162,000,000,000 What if China offers Chinese honest productive people those products; while America continues to outlaw legal money competition? At 1.3 billion, a third of which is roughly Four Hundred Million. 162 x 4 = 648 Same number of zeros: 648,000,000,000 Do you have that understood? That is power, per month, kept by the honest productive people, instead of that same measure of power flowing from the honest productive people flowing to the legal criminals who run their legal money monopolies in America compared, competitively, to the power stolen in China, per month. America: 100,000,000 people each, realizing 1,620 dollars per month savings, or production, to be spent, invested, or saved, each month. China: 400,000,000 people each, realizing as much power per month, each, savings, or production, to be spent, invested, or saved, each month. Combined, American, and Chinese, productive people potentially save more, if they cooperated, trade, and do so equitably. Exploited, American, and Chinese, productive people, by a few powerful legal criminals is what is, that is what is now happening, and it is happening by the rough measure I illustrate with product 1 and product 2. What happens if America legalizes monetary competition while China remains exploited by legal monetary monopoly, to the tune of the measure I offer with product 1 and product 2? $162,000,000,000 per month saved/earned/produced in America while China remains exploited? How long before America regain full economic dominance, peaceful, productive, and liberated economic dominance compared to the exploited competition? What happens if China is liberated to that very possible (if not likely) tune offered with the reasonably understandable product 1 and product 2 illustration? $648,000,000,000 per month commanded by the honest productive people in China, while America remains exploited by the legal power monopolies; The Federal Reserve people in particular? Product 1 and Product 2 illustrate that which is against the law now. Competition is against the law in China. Competition is against the law in America. If Product 1, and Product 2, were lawful products in America and not allowed in China, what do you think will happen? I know what will happen. You may be, reasonably, skeptical. Use your own brain. Returning to the article on China:
Please use your own brain. Stop reading from the script. The above is false, it is lies, it is parroting business as usual, it is ignorant if not willfully deceitful. Within Product 2 is the illustrated example of what can happen when competition is legal, and when monopoly is no longer enforced. A home owner can buy a Modular Home Vertical Farming Unit, or two, or three, and begin producing algae based diesel fuel, at home, and sell that power because that power is in demand now. The same investment can then be used to make algae based gasoline, for home use, or for sale, if gasoline is in demand. The same investment can be used, reconfigured, to make food, for home use, or for sale. One Modular Unit can be a home food supplier, and another can be a for sale, for profit, food producer, or algae based diesel fuel home use, and profit making venture, or gasoline. What stops the production of power from meeting the demand for power? If the question is willfully ignored, then willful ignorance is the answer to the question. If you don't ask, what does that confess? If you then blame me, what does that confess to you? I know what it confesses to me, I've been on this road for decades. Back to the article; on China. Prices of Chinese exports are already up 2.8 percent in the last 12 months, after years of gradual decline that helped restrain inflation in the United States. Joe's Law cuts through all that bull. Inflation is America is a direct result of monopoly power used in America to cut down the production of power in America. There are many examples, the law that forbids home owners from profiting from home produced electric power is one example. Blaming inflation, falsely, or half-true, on rising prices in China, resulting from scarce supplies of electric power in China, misses the mark. Power (electric power in China or America) produced to exceed the demand will reduce the price (or failure to even meet the demand will increase the price) of power, while purchasing power increases. I stop that sentence above at that point. You will have to figure this out yourself. Joe's Law is clear. Your mind may not be clear. When purchasing increases the increase in purchasing power can be called deflation; because each unit of money buys more; it deflates. Why are things made complex? Know the difference between increases and decreases in the power to purchase. If your money buys more today, compared to yesterday, your money is deflating, and the term "inflation" is meant to be confusing, because confusion is a state of powerlessness. Those who know why things are made to be confusing, on purpose, for profit, are not confused. Victims are confused, on purpose, for profit. Back to the report; on China: If Beijing and the utilities can resolve their differences, China plans to build even more coal-powered plants. Doing so would produce another big surge in emissions of greenhouse gases, of which China is already the world’s largest emitter. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that a city with a brown haze covering it is a health hazard for the people breathing in brown air. It also doesn't take a genius to figure out that many people, half the population as a rough average, making algae in their back yards, can provide all the power needed for the themselves, and sell extra power to the other half of the population. Do you know that the fuel used in the production of Algae is CO2? If the supposed leaders of the supposed free world suddenly suffered a fit of moral conscience, or conscious accurate awareness, so long as the story line here is fantasy, and those leaders declared war on powerlessness, and they ordered, as they are apt to do, the immediate production, at home, of algae based fuel, to demand that half the population immediately commence the production of algae based fuel at home, to produce more that twice each home owners own needs for fuel, power, so as to have more than enough power for everyone, how much CO2 would that war on powerlessness consume, and what do you think would be the waste product? Algae consumes CO2 and Algae, as far as I know, produces, as a waste product, oxygen. So the leaders of the free world declare war on powerlessness and they order half the population to begin producing algae fuel and make fuel too abundant, so abundant that the price of power is at the same price as clean oxygen, and a byproduct of that decision is a shrinking supply of CO2, and an expanding supply of clean oxygen world wide. And, unfortunately for some, the petroleum based oil business shrinks down to the size of, say, the whale oil business, a historical footnote. Note that I don't call the petroleum business by the false name Fossil Fuel. That is another story. Back to the report; on China. “Only coal can provide new capacity in the time and scale needed,” said David Fridley, a China energy expert at the University of California, Berkeley. A monopoly is, by definition, the absence of competition. By whatever force, or power, that competition is forced out, the absence of competition remains to be the definition of monopoly, like cold is the absence of heat. Know this, please. If America can declare war on both German and Japan, and in a few years time the honest productive workers, and the misguided soldiers, win those wars, why can't Americans declare war on powerlessness, and in a few years Americans win that war? Do you want the truth? The answer is easy to see. America first has to declare war on falsehood, and overnight Americans can win that battle. This is not news. http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/h/henryford136294.html It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning. Back to the report on China: The idea of recalcitrant utilities balking at Beijing’s dictates might seem to contradict the popular perception of China’s government-guided economy. But while the electric utilities are majority-owned by the government, they are also profit-motivated companies accountable to the other holders of their publicly traded stock. So the power companies’ incentives are not necessarily aligned with those of central planners in Beijing. The angle of view being reported is such that the power struggle is honest, and the power struggle is a known problem, and the power struggle involves honest people working hard to solve the known problem, and the angle of view suggests that the problem is very difficult to solve, and the angle of view suggests that mistakes will be made, and the angel of view suggests that the problem will be solved, if it can be solved, some day. That is a pure fantasy. All anyone has to do, if anyone wants to expose the truth, is a simple decision, followed by willful action, along many possible paths. You have to decide that you want to know the truth. Then you have to willfully employ your power toward achieving that goal. You can follow many paths, and one path you can choose to follow is a path offered to you by someone, like me, who has been on this path for decades. I offer one curious acronym: CAFR http://www.google.com/#hl=en&sugexp=ldymls&pq=cafr&xhr=t&q=cafr+exposed+walter+burien&cp=13&pf=p&sclient=psy&source=hp&aq=0v&aqi=&aql=&oq=cafr+exposed+&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=e4d813b43c7d221c&biw=1920&bih=937 Choose the path, go down the path, failure to do so will be a state of powerlessness. They are criminals, they commit crimes, they are not solving problems, they are problems, they do not provide solutions, they cause the problems. Know it, or remain powerless. It is possible, but certainly not known by me, that the Chinese Communist Government leaders are working to solve their powerless problem. Suppose that is true. What happens if the Chinese Communist Government leaders solve their problem of losing power with the solution of empowering billions of Chinese tax payers, which is the source of power flowing to the Chinese Government leaders? Do you think that the Chinese Communist Government leaders are concerned enough to know that billions of Chinese tax payers may become too powerful, and powerful enough to over power the Chinese Communist Government leaders? Did you ask yourself the following question: Who wins when the power supply is deliberately throttled down to a state of scarcity? That is the question I chose to begin this offering to you. The leadership at the top of OPEC, or Mobile, or Halliburton, or Wall Street, or U.S.A. Inc. (LLC), or China, have more in common with each other than they have with any honest productive person on the question of power. Who has a vested interest in making sure that power remains scarce, and therefore who has a vested interest in making sure that there is no competition? Power produced into oversupply reduces the price of power while purchasing power increases because power reduces the cost of production. More power is better for everyone except people who choose crime as a method of earning a living. You may have to look in the mirror. You may not actually want to know the truth, and that confesses something significant. But Chinese regulators have let electricity prices climb only 2.5 percent this spring. Residential users in China’s cities pay 8.2 cents a kilowatt-hour. That compares to a national average of 11 cents in the United States and 15 cents in the heavily urban mid-Atlantic region. Chinese industrial users in cities are supposed to pay 12 cents a kilowatt-hour, although politically connected businesses receive discounts; the average industrial rate in the United States is 7 cents, and 9 cents in the mid-Atlantic region. Note the ease with which the reporter accomplishes the difficult task of converting the disparity between measures of power between the "United States" and China. How is that accomplished? Do you find the quote above to be an accurate report of reality? What is the formula used in that report by which the cost of power is known in the "United States" compared to the cost of power in China? This is significant information, and if it is accurate information, then it is significantly useful information. The reporter uses the word cents. Chinese people do not use cents. Chinese people use a money that is an exclusive legal monopoly in China. The use of U.S.A. Inc. (LLC) money, or The Federal Reserve money, to be more accurate, as the money by which Chinese power costs will be measured is an obvious choice, since the report is in English, and the report is obviously targeting people in America, or "The West", and therefore people in "The West" will understand the value of a cent. America power costs about 12 cents per Kilowatt/hour. If you are following this, having read the report on China, and you are reading my comments, then you are now being directly involved in the same process by which I formed Joe's Law. Power is power, or it isn't power. Money is: The Power to Purchase, or it isn't money. The measure of money is the measure of how powerful it is, and the same is true of electric power. Electric power is constant power, measurable as a watt, a watt does not increase value (deflate), and a watt does not decrease value (inflate). No politician on Earth can change the value of a watt. American power costs about 12 cents per Kilowatt/hour. Chinese power costs about 10 cents per Kilowatt/hour. I am offering the above statements as an illustration, not as a factual account of the rough average of actual price of electricity. The illustration intends to clue the reader in on the significance of this measure of power. Note how the article does not actually report anything of use in this goal of knowing the relative price of power between America and China. I am offering a guess, and my guess is that Chinese power is priced less than American power, and I do so not suggesting that my guess is true, only suggesting that starting point so as to proceed with the significance of that measure - if it is true. If it is true that power is prices less in China compared to the higher price for power in America, if that is true, then, China is more competitive. That is a significant fact, if it is true. If, on the other hand, it is not true, then America is more competitive. If you do not understand that, then you can, and you may be empowered in knowing the truth of that understanding - once you understand it. Make it personal. By making it personal, you can understand it. If America is more powerful, it is more competitive, so, naturally, if you are more powerful, then you are more competitive, and if your neighbor is even more powerful, compared to a Chinese person in China, then the measure of how much more powerful America is, compared to China, is thereby defined and defined accurately. How are you more powerful? What would happen if you could borrow from yourself and stop paying for two homes, whereby the mortgage interest rate you pay, each month, is sent to someone else, where someone else has enough money to buy a home, a home you pay for, and instead of buying another home, your money is being invested in China, and invested in China so as to rape, torture, and murder anyone who gets in the way of that home grown money monopoly business that manages to convince you, every month, to keep sending that money, and even more money that that mortgage interest money, in the form of involuntary taxes, making you less powerful, each month, and making them (the legal criminals) more powerful each month? Make it personal. If America is more powerful than China it is only more powerful because Americans are still able to produce more surplus wealth than Americans consume, while Americans are being robbed through mortgage interest and taxation, compared to the crimes going on in China, as the honest productive Chinese people are similarly victimized. There are two groups. A. Honest productive people. B. Criminals. Those who pay the price for power, and those who steal power from those who pay the price for power. The article about China is either written by an ignorant person in the honest productive people group, or it is written by a person in the criminal group, and the measure of the article, no matter who wrote it, is measurable by how the words affect the readers of the words. Are you inspired to keep transferring your earnings to people who may then use the power you sent them against you? Are you inspired to use some of your power investing in China? What are you inspired to do, as a result of reading the article? I'm curious. I am inspired to comment on the article, my work is this paper trail you are now reading, or speed reading; assuming a lot on my part. The price of electricity is as important of a measure of which country is more powerful as is the price of money, which is, the price of money is: Interest. When powerful money is abundant, as abundant as powerful electricity, both prices go down, because the price of things that are abundant, like the price of sunlight, or the price of clean air, is lower, and lower, and lower, as it becomes more, and more, abundant. When powerful money is scarce, or electricity is scarce, or motor fuel is scarce, or clean air is scarce, or sunlight is scarce (nuclear winter), then who must pay that price? Why is powerful money scarce? Why is electricity scarce? Why is motor fuel scarce? Why is clean air scarce? The answer is simple. There are people who make those things scarce on purpose, because they profit from that work, to make those things scarce, and to make those things scarce they must first gain the power needed, and then they must then use the power they steal, in the work that eliminates competition, which must happen, or failure to make that happen results, inevitably, in competition, whereby someone else will produce that which is demanded, be it more powerful money, or more electricity, or more motor fuel, or more clean air. Example: Algae can be produced cheaply, independently, to replace coal, petroleum, and natural gas, as a fuel, and the process of producing that cheap and abundant fuel consumes CO2, and that process produces oxygen, so, put on your thinking caps, why is that fact not common knowledge known by any supposed political economy expert, reporting how bad, or how good, the news is today? That is all I have to report today, and I have yet to edit this present offering, and the kitchen is a mess, and it is already 10:32 AM May, 25 2011. 1:10 PM and I have to get to work, no time to clean the kitchen, no time to finish editing. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Oil scarcity enforcement |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Listening to Alex Jones 06-03-2011 10:14am PDT I hear Alex speak of being labeled as a "Conspiracy Theorist" and then Alex says that he is proud to wear that title, or some such words expressing the concept. I want to teach Alex Jones a lesson about this false label stuff, and I will use history to convey, or illustrate, the process of false labels, I will use the example of the Anti-Federalists; who were the "Conspiracy Theorists" of the day, back in the days before the Legal Criminals (or Globalists, or Elite, or whatever term works for you, so long as you accurately identify the planers and the executors of the global take over by way of legal monopoly money extortion fraud); before the Legal Criminals threw out the working experimental Federated Democratic Republic (enforcing peaceful, voluntary, and welcome competition among separate and sovereign States), and before the Legal Criminals ushered in their criminal dictatorship, Nation State, Consolidated Government, enabled into law by The Constitution fraud, in that time period, the Anti-Federalists were the modern day "Conspiracy Theorists" and one of them, a vocal member of that Conspiracy Theory group, was a man named Patrick Henry. Patrick Henry was a "Conspiracy Theorist" of his day; the false label of that day was "Anti-Federalist". Patrick Henry speaks for himself (better than I can by a wide margin): http://www.constitution.org/afp/phenry00.htm Right now, coincidentally, Alex Jones is interviewing someone who is offering American History. Will Alex Jones, and anyone Alex Jones interviews, ever expose the true nature of The Constitution, as Patrick Henry, one of histories famous "Conspiracy Theorists", did, in his speeches in opposition to The Constitution fraud. Know this much: You are labeled exactly the opposite of what you are by the people who steal your money power, your power to produce surplus wealth is stolen from you by the same people who invent, and then propagate the false labels attached to you, and the modern example is "Conspiracy Theorist". The past example was "Anti-Federalist". For the crime of questioning the common, popular, and fashionable, theories of conspiracy, you are labeled the opposite of what you intend to accomplish. If you oppose the official tendency to stop the process of finding out who actually commits crimes, and if you oppose the official tendency to excuse the failure to actually expose the criminals who commit crimes by claiming that the crimes are perpetrated by a nebulous, mysterious, unknown "Conspiracy Theory", then you are labeled a "Conspiracy Theorists" for your effort to expose the folly of "Conspiracy Theory". You want to know the truth, you question the "official" version of the truth, which is a true conspiracy theory, you question the validity of the official theory of conspiracy, you question the official version of the truth, which is a theory of conspiracy, and you are blamed for that very thing, as you are somehow, by some power, given, the name "Conspiracy Theory", and that mud, thrown on you, sticks, with some power of glue. Got that? Here comes the History lesson, for you, given to you, by me, since I did my home work, and you did not. During the time period between British oppression and America defense a number of honest productive people fled Britain and began prospering in America, and to do so they invented their own money, called Stamp Script, and they began to experiment with governments fashioned after such things as Magna Carte (with Trial by Jury = each legal person has the power to veto any law) and a Republic, such as the model offered by the Swiss. Ask: How can the Swiss avoid World War I and World War II while those wars where perpetrated all around that working Republic? During that time period when honest productive Americans began an experimental Federated Democratic Republic the Legal Criminals from Britain invaded America so as to enforce their despotism upon the honest productive American people, to enslave them, to take the surplus wealth created by them, and then to use that power against them. Like this: http://www.ushistory.org/paine/commonsense/sense2.htm Break: I'll quote and continue after reporting that Alex Jones' guest is speaking about England and their spies. Did you know that Alexander Hamilton, one of the men behind the move to create The Constitution, and one of the men exposed by the "Anti-Federalists" (like Patrick Henry) was accused of being an agent for the British Monarchy, and, on top of that Alexander Hamilton confesses, openly, a preference for a Monarchy over the less dictatorial Federated Democratic Republic. Society in every state is a blessing, but Government, even in its best state, is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one: for when we suffer, or are exposed to the same miseries BY A GOVERNMENT, which we might expect in a country WITHOUT GOVERNMENT, our calamity is heightened by reflecting that we furnish the means by which we suffer. So, in that time period, between British rule, and the ratification of The Constitution, a time existed when America was governing itself within an enabling document called The Articles of Confederation, and that power, that American power, with the help of the French, defeated, and drove out, the largest military power on the planet, and it did so with an all volunteer Army. It did that with Separate and Sovereign States within a voluntary (States can join or separate voluntarily) Union under The Articles of Confederation. In that time period the Nationalists hatched a plan to seize dictatorial control over all the Separate and Sovereign States, and usher in Dictatorship by way of an enforced money monopoly power. Alexander Hamilton was one of the Nationalists pushing that plan into effect. In order to get away with that fraud the Nationalists had to hide themselves behind a false front. The Nationalists chose, and then hid behind, the false front of Federalism. The Nationalists called themselves Federalists. Do you understand that history so far? The Nationalists, seeking dictatorial powers over all the Separate and Sovereign States, and seeking a legal money monopoly power, could not get away with their crime, if they openly, and publicly, confessed that they were Nationalists, and they could not get away with that crime if they confessed that they were planning to enforce a legal money monopoly power, so, they claimed that they were Federalists. Got that? Why did they claim that they were Federalists? They claimed that they were Federalists because the concept of federalism was the government of choice at the time, a Federated Democratic Republic was as voluntary as a government could be at the time, and it was a form of government that made use of competition between Separate and Sovereign State governments, whereby one State growing more dictatorial would find their tax payers voting with their feet and moving to other Separate and Sovereign States within the voluntary Federated Democratic Republic, and the concept works, is proven to work, at that time, with specific examples of how it works, such as Shays's Rebellion as one shinning example of how it works. There is much more to how it works, including the concept of Trial by Jury, and other things, things addressed by Patrick Henry, at the time, as Patrick Henry tried to expose the Nationalists, as Patrick Henry tried to lift the thin cloak of false Federalism, and Patrick Henry tried to champion Federalism. So, do you have that understood up to this point, and if so, guess what the Nationalists did to people like Patrick Henry, and all those who opposed Nationalism; what did the Nationalists (hiding behind a false front of Federalism) do to the Federalists who opposed the Nationalists? Are you out of guesses? The Nationalists, who were promising Federalism to the gullible massive mobs of the majority, were being exposed by the actual Federalists, and so, the Nationalists ran a false advertisement campaign, and they invented another false label, and they effectively inspired the gullible massive mobs of the majority to attach that false label to the actual Federalists who opposed the Nationalists, and that false label is: Anti-Federalists. Do you see the connection yet? Today a "Conspiracy Theorist" is a person who is against the official conspiracy theories, for many reasons that a person may become against the official conspiracy theory, a person does become against the official conspiracy theory, and once a person does become against the official conspiracy theory, that person who has become against the official conspiracy theory is then labeled, by some mysterious power of falsehood, a "Conspiracy Theorist" for becoming against the official conspiracy theory. Got that? If you become aware of the fact that the official conspiracy theory is false, or could be false, or could be less than accurate, you will then set out in opposition of blind belief in that official conspiracy theory, and for that, for that turn of events in your life, you will then be labeled a "Conspiracy Theorist". Got that? What is the historical president? If you were living in the time period between the prosperous American revolution and The Constitution and you became aware of the crimes being perpetrated by the Nationalists hiding behind a false front of Federalism, and you then began to support Federalism in opposition to Nationalism, you would have then been labeled an Anti-Federalist, and that label would stick up to today. Today, we are taught, that the "Founding Fathers" created a Republic with The Constitution, when, in fact, the opposite was perpetrated. What do you call me, for the crime of delivering the message to you? You can call me Anti-Constitution, or an Anti-American who opposes The Constitution. Will that be true, half true, ignorant, or deliberately false if you do so. What do I support, actually, and how can you know if you dictate to me that which I support, despite any effort on my part to keep your mud off of me, since I prefer not to have the mud you place on me stick to me? The Constitution is what it is, and it enables that which people do, including such things as Suppressing Rebellions, such as the historical example offered by The Whiskey Rebellion. The Constitution was used, by those who constructively interpreted it, because it was designed to be constructively interpreted, to create a legal monopoly bank, then another one, and then a better one in the form of The FED. The Constitution was used, again by those who constructively interpreted it, to solve The Indian Problem, with that Final Solution, and the same enabling document was used to enforce Slavery, and the same enabling document was used to perpetrate The Civil War, as two competing criminal governments waged war over control of the honest productive victims of their separate and sovereign despotic forms of government - slaves on both sides. Different colors, same business as usual, business cycle, legal monopoly money enforcement fraud competitors, fighting over turf. If it was a true Federated Democratic Republic it would not have allowed The Whiskey Rebellion, the people rebelling against the legal money monopoly fraud in Pennsylvania would not have had to face a conscripted Army run by the new Dictator as the new Dictator crushed "so fatal a Spirit" the same Spirit of 1776. What is that power that enables a person who is against dictatorship, a person who is for liberty, whereby a person who becomes a supporter of liberty, and whereby a person who becomes against dictatorship, is then labeled with a label that is the exact opposite? What is the measure of that power? What is the nature of that power? What is the character of that power? What is the constitution of that power? If you don't know, it is past time for you to know, failure to know is ignorance, but once you are asked, failure to know is willful ignorance, and considering the weight of the consequences for failing to know, I am informing you of the fact that willful ignorance at this point amounts to stupidity. Stupid people are powerless against the power of falsehood, and all the costs that go with that mire. Gather up enough stupid people into one network, so long as some of those stupid people can produce more than they consume, and once you do that, in your own mind's eye, measure the power that can be sucked out of that network, and if you have read this far, and if you have that pile of stupid people, working harder and harder, in your mind, and you begin to imagine the amount of power that can be sucked out of that network of hard working stupid people, when you got that, keep it in view long enough to look at the next link. http://www.usdebtclock.org/ |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9RqqGIwCFW8&feature=player_embedded Anyone, Within that video are a few statements concerning Oil prices. Please understand how things that are productive power supplies are different from things that are not productive power supplies. Too many chairs, for example, is not the same thing as too many kilowatt/hours of electricity. You can understand the significant difference in many ways, and I can start explaining the significant differences with those two examples above. Producing too many chairs will cause the price of chairs to go down, as everyone has chairs, and there are now too many chairs, so making more chairs, when there are too many chairs, is an example of malinvestment, or spending productive power in such a way as to cause higher costs of living and lower standards of living on a net, overall, average, basis. One person making too many chairs is not the same thing as, say, The Federal Reserve Chairman increasing the money supply by double and then lending that money at less than the rate of inflation in interest, which is negative interest, or paying someone to use the money, and making sure that the borrower only makes chairs with double the supply of money, or for failing to do that with the money, as punishment: The Federal Reserve Chairman cuts off any more money to the chair maker. Well the chair maker may complain, saying, ahhhh, dude, there are already way too many chairs, and you want me to use the entire sum of the current money supply, which you just doubled, and you hand me a check for that much money, and you want me to make nothing but chairs, ahhh, don't you now that that is stupid, not to mention how that is criminal, since so many people are in dire need of their personal earnings, and doing this will cut their personal earnings in half, by you ordering me to do this, this waste, this criminal waste of all that power to purchase, which amounts to a tax on all those people who are paid in dollars? That is how things work when working with chairs, which is not as bad as working with destructive things like lies, threats of violence, and acts of violence upon the innocent, which is much more criminally wrong than abusing double the money supply power in the work of making too many chairs, so let's run that chair example through to see how that analogy works out before moving on to the net affect of abusing double the money supply on producing too many lies, too many threats of violence, and too many acts of violence upon the innocent, which is another analogy, on a scale of analogies, and then we can move onto an analogy of abusing double the money supply on producing productive power. We did this: 1. What happens if Ben orders too many chairs, when doubling the total supply of dollars. We can do this next: 2. What happens if Ben orders too many aggressive wars for profit, when doubling the total supply of dollars. And then: 3. What happens when Ben orders too many kilowatt/hours of electricity production, when doubling the total supply of dollars. So, as you can see, if you understand the video at the top of the page, that Ben is taxing us, and you can also understand that Ron thinks that Ben is not doing good, and you can understand that if Ben had ordered the production of only chairs, by doubling the money supply, and paying a chair making to make only chairs with double the money supply of dollars, then things wouldn't be good in America as a result. You can think the "too many chairs" scenario through, a little better, before moving into the next two examples on the scale we are constructing here and now. A lot of wood is needed, and there will be a lot of chairs produced with double the money supply that was in circulation in 2008. Ben doubles the money supply in 2008, orders chairs, nothing but chairs, and a whole lot of trees are cut down, to make chairs. Soon everyone has enough chairs, and actually almost everyone already has enough chairs, so what happens to all the new chairs ordered by Ben? Ben and the chair producer purchased by Ben could stack the chairs up and form one gigantic pyramid of chairs, and when someone wants one, the chair guy can sell one from the gigantic pyramid of chairs, while everyone else has to contend with higher prices, and everyone else is still paid the same wage, or less, since all that money was spent making a pyramid of chairs. Thanks Ben. Thanks for causing the prices on everything to double, while our pay stays the same, so that you can make a whole lot of Chairs. The net increase in the standard of living is measurable as chairs. The net cost of living increases measurable as the difference between the increase in prices and the lack of increase in earnings, or the disparity between rising prices and rising earnings (not just wages). If the chair dude can't pay back the loan, the loan that Ben gave the chair guy, for less cost to the chair guy, less "interest rate" that is less than the rate of inflation, which amounts to someone paying someone to take out a loan, then Ben can bail him out too, after he defaults too, with more of what used to be your money, Ben can call up his buddies who help with the bail out paperwork. Do you have it clear in your mind how chairs can be a bad investment when doubling the money supply of legal dollars and then spending that much money on making more chairs? Now we can move to doubling the money supply so as to start a few, or many, more aggressive wars for profit in other countries where there are a lot of goodies to steal, such as oil, gold, diamonds, and another added feature to these aggressive wars for profit is the feature by which the competition can be eliminated, as those competitors sell their stuff to China, Russia, Brazil, Cuba (if they can get past the blockade), Iran (blockaded), Palestine (blockaded), Venezuela, and other places. And there is the additional feature of eliminating world competitors in money markets, so as to keep The Dollar Hegemony, on top. The down side for some, but an additional up side for a very few at the top, is, too bad for everyone else: World War III. 2. What happens if Ben orders too many aggressive wars for profit, when doubling the total supply of dollars. Ben pays people to borrow money to start wars. Not chairs. The interest rate charged for loaning out double the money supply is an effective negative interest rate, or it is the same thing as paying someone to loan money, so Ben makes an offer that can't be refused, if the borrowers have no working moral conscience, and they won't look the gift horse in the mouth. They take the money and they start the wars, they are rewarded handsomely. Ben pats them on the back, and they pat Ben on the back, a jolly good crew. Too many aggressive wars for profit, and what happens? Well, it can be well understood that the pyramid of chairs won't be built. There will be a pyramid of dead bodies, and as well as the case with the pyramid of chairs there will be a whole lot of people whose standard of living decreases while their costs of living increase because their power was malinvested, from their viewpoint. From the viewpoint of Ben, and those who are rewarded for torture, and mass murder, the investment was very sound, and they laugh all the way to what used to be your bank. Reality is a bitch. That is 2 divisions, now, on the scale being shown to you. I can offer pictures too. There are many high definition pictures that depict aggressive wars for profit, piles of bodies, and I can draw a picture of a mountain of chairs, but I am going to give the few readers here a measure of credit concerning their ability to use their own imagination. 1. What happens if Ben orders too many chairs, when doubling the total supply of dollars. 2. What happens if Ben orders too many aggressive wars for profit, when doubling the total supply of dollars. 3. What happens when Ben orders too many kilowatt/hours of electricity production, when doubling the total supply of dollars. What happens in example 3 on the scale of what happens when malinvestment measures up on a scale of worst to best? Keep in mind that one person's evaluation of good isn't as good as the next person's, depending upon who is doing the evaluating. Note too that only Ben can double the money supply of legal collars. Ron can't. You can't. I can't. And get away with it. And do it again. Suppose Ben doubles the supply of dollars and pays someone to borrow that much power to purchase, before that money can cause inflation, Ben spends it first, Ben buys a borrower, the next guy spends it second, and Ben only loans this money out to someone who will make more kilowatt/hours of electricity, or else, the same rule applies, you don't do what Ben says, you don't get paid to borrow money again. Ben has power, you don't. Ben has your power. You don't. You are intimately connected to Ben by way of the legal dollar, too bad for you. So the money supply is what is was before Ben doubled the money supply, and then Ben wrote a check equal to the total supply of legal dollars currently in circulation, and Ben buys as many more kilowatt/hours of electricity that can be produced with double the supply of legal dollars, and Ben says hurry up. Work that out some. What happens if the borrower does as told in various ways, such as, creating nothing but Solar Panels, selling them to whoever will use them, so as to increase the number of kilowatt/hours produced? Will that do? Will Ben be happy? What happens to the price of electricity if Ben creates double the supply of legal dollars and then Ben orders nothing but more electricity produced with that increase in the total supply of dollars, and the order is filled, and in one year all that money makes that much more electricity: what happens? There is so much electricity produced, that there is too much electricity, and what happens to the price of electricity? You pay the price of having your money spent on electricity but you get some of that money back because the price of electricity goes down, there is too much of it, and what does too much electricity look like? 1. Too many chairs look like a pyramid of too may chairs, all the excess is stored in one pile. 2. Too many aggressive wars for profit generate piles of dead bodies, and I can link the pictures if you have no clue about how that works. 3. What does too many kilowatt/hours of electricity look like when that is what Ben orders when Ben doubles the money supply and gives that money to the people on his list, and Ben want's more electricity? How do you store too much electricity? If aluminum cans are made, that is one way to store electricity. If salt water is pumped out of the ocean and pumped inland to higher elevations, that is a way to store electricity, because water can then be allowed to flow back down, and the water can be used to turn electric generating turbines. How many chairs can be produced with double the money supply of legal dollars? How many aggressive wars for profit can be produced with double the money supply of legal dollars? How many kilowatt/hours of electricity can be produced with double the money supply of legal dollars? Even if the electricity was produced so as to ground the power into the Earth, making electricity to waste it, the things that had to be made to make more electricity would be made, and once Ben and his crew were done with those things, they would be left laying around for someone else to use, and use productively. That is not the case with too may chairs. That is not the case with too many aggressive wars for profit (the supreme crime man has ever invented upon mankind, so far); but Ben can loan money to other borrowers who get no bid contracts to rebuild what they destroy. That is not the case with any form of productive power, such as electricity. Joe's Law: Power produced into a state of oversupply decreases the price of power while purchasing power increases because power reduces the cost of production. |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Where did Peak Oil go? |
|||||||||||
|
Joe Kelley Administrator
|
Anyone, Here is a link: http://www.personalliberty.com/conservative-politics/electric-cars-a-bad-idea-whose-time-has-come/?eiid=&rmid=2011_09_28_PLA_[P11167147]&rrid=395224738 More and more I find evidence of a campaign by which solar panels and electric cars are being demonized, as if those things are bad. Those things are sources of independent power. So long as a Solar Panel continues to cost the user less than the cost of the power that the Solar Panel produces so long will the Solar Panel be a competitive independent power. Which investments work better than a Solar Panel, what is the return on investment of a Solar Panel? The cost of the investment is the price of the Solar Panel. If a person buys new, from a vendor, the buyer pays for a lot of extra costs compared to a person buying parts, and assembling those parts. If the cost of buying a Solar Panel is less than the cost of paying for all the electricity produced by the Solar Panel what is that difference in power spent and power consumed? I've read that a Solar Panel bought today can conceivably be paid off in 5 years as the cost of electricity produced adds up to the same amount as the price of the Solar Panel. In other words. You pay 1000 dollars for the Solar Panel. 5 years go by and you produce 1000 dollars worth of electricity with the Solar Panel. What happens if the Solar Panel still produces 1000 dollars worth of electricity for 20 more years; since they have been guaranteed to produce for 25 years? These are very rough mathematical illustrations of the general point; and the general answer is easy to see. In 5 years the Solar Panel pays for itself. The Solar Panel keeps paying out for 20 more years. Compared to a savings account where the money saved is paying out 3% while inflation is 6% is a net loss of 3%. Compared to a savings account the Solar Panel is a net gain of 100% after 10 years. 200% after 15 years. 300% after 20 years. 400% at the end of the projected life span (depreciation) of the investment. Where does that report where the reporter demonizes Solar Panels get off? Electric Cars are currently manufactured in American by Tesla Motors. Tesla Motors is a viable business despite the huge amounts of subsidies flowing to the competition in the non-competitive automobile market. It is non-competitive because of the subsidies flowing to the "socialist" (and I use that term loosely) automakers. Where does that reporter get off? Electricity is a power source, and independent people can now sell electricity by law, and in so doing an individual person competes with any competitor including the heavily subsidized "socialist" power companies. Where does that reporter get off? What is his problem? I think he is being paid to tell lies. You can think whatever is in your power to think. Good luck. |
|||||||||||
