 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OVstRl9mwyU&feature=emb_title
The meanings of words change at an accelerating rate, for reasons that may be difficult to convey with words that rapidly change meanings.
Time 38:28 above: "...the Constitution says..."
The speaker is ignorant. That which he claims is in the Constitution (1787) is not, it is in The Bill of Rights. Also, to claim that he, or anyone else, can derive official meaning from the Constitution of 1787 is missing the point pointed out by those against the (criminal) Constitution of 1787, such as George Mason who referred to the constructability of meaning written into the criminal confession at the crime scene.