 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Sir William ScroggsJanuary 1, 1728
E. & R. Nutt, and R. Gosling
“The Steward may impose a Fine upon one who is elected Constable by the Jury, “
Note the date 1728. At some point after Magna Carta (1215) the nature of law decidedly turned from a just nature to a criminal nature as “jurisdiction” shifted out of the hands of the people themselves (juries, sheriffs, and whatever words are used to mean volunteers volunteering to help secure mutual defense, holding to an accurate accounting of who is a victim and who is a criminal), and “jurisdiction” was taken (by criminal means) by people who counterfeit the law power (finding the truth in any matter), as the criminal elements begin to construct and maintain counterfeit versions of Courts.
The original courts (natural law) were made up of the people themselves, selected randomly, and these law officers were jurors. What was the extent of the lawful powers of these jurors in their jurisdictions?
There above in quotes is an example of the lawful powers of these jurors at a time when the counterfeiting of the law was already working to a great extent, as measured by claims of counterfeit authority in opposition to the authority already recognized as authority commanded by those jurors.
Jurors are representatives of the people as a whole, as confirmed by the fact that jurors were selected randomly. The power of selecting jurors is thereby taken out of the hands of special interest groups, and the power of selecting jurors is given to chance, or is a power given up by any number of people less than the whole number of people: The Public. The power given up by any special interest group (such as The Government), or the accuser, or the defendant, is a power given to more than just chance. The lottery of jury selection is authorized as known advancement in science. It is not necessary to place a defendant before the whole country, and it is not necessary to place a prosecutor (accuser) before the whole country to prove guilt to the whole country, and it is not necessary to assemble the whole country in a trial to then demand a unanimous decision made by the whole country of people, in order to then unleash the violent actions of law upon presumed to be innocent accused defendants. It is not necessary to ask the whole country to assemble for the purpose of finding a fact in a lawful case.
It is possible to find what the whole country (The Public) demands for justice in any case by assembling representative samples of the whole country, but to do so there can be no “jury stacking,” or “packing a jury,” which is a subset of “jury tampering.” If a side of The Public, something less than the whole, hand picks who is or who is not on the jury, then obvious bias is in place, which thereby counterfeits the will of The Public, turning the will of The Public into a Special Interest Group using government power to perpetrate an obvious crime added to whichever is the alleged crime in any case. The government for the people as a whole becomes a weapon in the hands of criminals. The capacity of the people to defend themselves voluntarily becomes the capacity of a segment of the people gaining absolute power over their defenseless victims.
What powers (jurisdiction) are commanded by jurors in any case, anywhere, anytime, on this planet? Jurors in the information quoted - apparently - commanded the power to elect a Constable.
Why would jurors elect a Constable?
Why would true jurors elect a Constable?
Why would counterfeit jurors be allowed to, or told to, elect a Constable?