 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
The shoe was not meant to fit anyone that does not fit into the shoe, and I hope that these are not too many words, or too few.
Discussion is the real law power, as for example investigatory jurors deliberate in the effort to share viewpoints as to the right or wrong of ignoring false or trivial accusations, and the right or wrong of presenting legitimate accused individuals with a trial date, so as to offer the accused their equal footing of real law power. Similarly trial jurors deliberately deliberate in the effort to constitute a true representation of the whole country of people in the location where an accuser has accused an accused individual of something worthy of unleashing the whole country into action in the effort to remedy a conflict.
Someone creating a pond, on their own authority, on their own land, to then provide water in case of fire that endangers life in the area, is not a terrorist in my view. I am one of those who constitute the whole country of people in the location where I locate. Someone kidnapping babies, or children, or young adults, or adults, or middle-aged people, or old people, and using those enslaved people for amusement or profit is a serial perpetrator of treasonous, heinous, capital, felonies. I would most certainly put my 2 cents into a presentment that moves a Jeffery Epstein from freeholder at liberty to accused, presumed to be innocent, defendant stating his case before the whole country represented in a trial jury in a trial by the country, if I were afforded the opportunity to do so by my fellow Americans. I would do that in the location where I locate because the accused is accused by someone in my location for having perpetrated the accused crimes in my location, according to what remains of the common law in my location.
If we the people have been corralled, cajoled, enticed, or otherwise controlled into becoming a single Nation State, then we are one country now, not many independent localities formed into independent individuals, families, towns, cities, counties, Nation States (example: Rhode Island), and all those independent, sovereign, entities, voluntarily formed into a Federation for our mutual defense of our lives, liberties, property, and our common law.
If, on the other hand, we the people afford each other as much law power as we voluntarily take upon our own authority, then we ought to learn from history and mind our own business in our own jurisdictions that extend roughly as far as we can afford to relocate when duty or necessity requires.
An assembly of the most discrete and honest among us in that area we all can afford to police on our own authority constitutes a grand jury in fact, not in fiction. Imagine a counter virus that works like a cure for the cancer of malfeasance in office and in each sovereign (independent) individual law power, those counter virus empowered people work effectively to discover, find, locate, become aware of, and inspire those who are most discrete and honest, and all of these counter viruses actually form those historic, ancient, cures for the cancer of malfeasance in office, those grand juries in those localities in every area where the common law has always been, and will always be, in power, if we decide to access it.
What would a presentment look like concerning anyone in any office anywhere in each town, city, county, State, or Federation of States? Which one would be good enough? Which presentment would constitute the cause to act in defense of all those slaves yet to be born, all those slaves just born, all those slaves yet to learn how to speak, and all those slaves yet to be shown either lawful behavior or the opposite?
If the shoe doesn’t fit then you don’t wear the shoe.
"Responsibility must be individual, or there is no responsibility at all."
Equitable Commerce by Josiah Warren, 1852
If you decided to volunteer to be a grand juror, and you were faced with a go or no go decision to place Jeffery Epstein (or anyone similar in your location) before a trial by the country (trial by jury) to state his case, would you help document a legible presentment, and if so what message would you place into a court of record in that, or a similar, case?