 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
People naturally cooperate for mutual benefit so as to survive and thrive. People live and let live according to natural laws that some people attribute to one all-powerful God. The law is to do unto others as if other's are one's self. As clearly as one might expect to react to actions done by other's to one's self, so can one expect other's to similarly react to those same actions done to them, such as forced labor under penalty of torture, death, or worse. Why would anyone start on such a path to hell on earth? Why would anyone attempt to excuse it?
What forces are working to cause people to believe in these ongoing rationalizations that attempt to excuse forced labor under penalty of torture, death, or worse? It is as if a lie told often enough can turn a criminal into a saint.
"The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned."
People are led to believe the lie that doing evil onto others before others can do the same is the law of the land.
In America, that alteration of truth, turning truth into a lie, is well documented on the official record kept by the perpetrators who got away with that crime against nature itself. In your face, if you care to read it, is the evidence proving the fact.
Thomas Jefferson, A Summary View of the Rights of British America, August 1745
"For the most trifling reasons, and sometimes for no conceivable reason at all, his majesty has rejected laws of the most salutary tendency. The abolition of domestic slavery is the great object of desire in those colonies, where it was unhappily introduced in their infant state. But previous to the enfranchisement of the slaves we have, it is necessary to exclude all further importations from Africa; yet our repeated attempts to effect this by prohibitions, and by imposing duties which might amount to a prohibition, have been hitherto defeated by his majesty’s negative: Thus preferring the immediate advantages of a few African corsairs to the lasting interests of the American states, and to the rights of human nature, deeply wounded by this infamous practice. Nay, the single interposition of an interested individual against a law was scarcely ever known to fail of success, though in the opposite scale were placed the interests of a whole country. That this is so shameful an abuse of a power trusted with his majesty for other purposes, as if not reformed, would call for some legal restrictions. . . "
Thomas Jefferson
Declaration of Independence
"he has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating it's most sacred rights of life & liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating & carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere, or to incur miserable death in their transportation thither. this piratical warfare, the opprobrium of infidel powers, is the warfare of the CHRISTIAN king of Great Britain. determined to keep open a market where MEN should be bought & sold, he has prostituted his negative for suppressing every legislative attempt to prohibit or to restrain this execrable commerce: and that this assemblage of horrors might want no fact of distinguished die, he is now exciting those very people to rise in arms among us, and to purchase that liberty of which he has deprived them, & murdering the people upon whom he also obtruded them; thus paying off former crimes committed against the liberties of one people, with crimes which he urges them to commit against the lives of another."
In the Writings of Thomas Jefferson, Vol. I. p. 10
"The clause, too, reprobating the enslaving the inhabitants of Africa, was struck out in complaisance to South Carolina and Georgia, who had never attempted to restrain the importation of slaves, and who, on the contrary, still wished to continue it. Our northern brethren also, I believe felt a little tender under those censures; for, though their people had very few slaves themselves, yet they had been pretty considerable carriers of them to others."
Among those now called The Founders were a group of criminals posing as so-called founders.
To the citizens of the United States by Thomas Paine
November 15, 1802
"But a faction, acting in disguise, was rising in America; they had lost sight of first principles. They were beginning to contemplate government as a profitable monopoly, and the people as hereditary property. It is, therefore, no wonder that the "Rights of Man" was attacked by that faction, and its author continually abused. But let them go on; give them rope enough and they will put an end to their own insignificance. There is too much common sense and independence in America to be long the dupe of any faction, foreign or domestic.
"But, in the midst of the freedom we enjoy, the licentiousness of the papers called Federal (and I know not why they are called so, for they are in their principles anti-federal and despotic), is a dishonor to the character of the country, and an injury to its reputation and importance abroad. They represent the whole people of America as destitute of public principle and private manners.”
Those criminals were Nationalists at a time when Nationalism was understood as a form of subsidized slavery or an organized form of crime under the false pretense of religious or lawful authority.
The actual founding of a revolutionary idea was based upon the idea that all are equal (equal footing) under the law, and at that time the law of the land was understood to be called the common law, with trial by jury. Trial by jury, not trial by the government is the law of the land. Trial by jury was also known to be trial by the country. Trial by the country, not trial by the government is the law of the land. The actual founding idea was such that the anointed “Leader of the Free World” was no such thing, in fact, the Royal claim to authority was a sham, and everyone is as naturally authorized to be the lawful power as everyone else: equal footing.
No more sham “Divine Right of Kings,” now we the people are either going to defend our rights against infringement by scam authorities, or we will live and die as slaves.
The criminal Nationalists had to get rid of those ideas, to wipe those ideas out of human consciousness. The criminal Nationalists had to replace human conscience with a destructive counterfeit. Out had to go accurate accountability of the facts that matter in any case, anywhere, anytime, involving any victims harmed by any criminals, most importantly criminals posing as the government, and in place of accurate accountability of the facts that matter in each case is the return to rule by criminals posing as the government: orders to be obeyed without question.
The revolutionary example was set as it was documented on that Declaration of Independence. As that document was first written, it was the awful truth of the matter. Then the official record which recorded the revolutionary idea was censored. The truth was edited by the criminals infesting government during the founding process.
The criminals infesting government got away with it then, the criminals in government get away with it today. Is that our future? Is that what is left to posterity?