| View single post by Joe Kelley | |||||||||||||
| Posted: Sat Nov 3rd, 2018 10:38 pm |
|
||||||||||||
Joe Kelley
|
Founding documents? How can you publish that with a straight face? Perhaps it is published with tongue firmly n cheek? There is a Declaration of Independence which enumerates the crimes against humanity perpetrated by the worst criminal running the worst criminal organization that was then on the planet earth. OK, got that one. There is no mention of the Independent State Constitutions (one state had no constitution: their law was in their collective memory), nor is there any mention of the Articles of Confederation that served and protected well enough to drive off the worst criminal army of aggression for profit that was then on the planet. Why not mention the State Constitutions, the Bills of Rights in State Constitutions, the common law, trial by jury, trial by the country? Too wordy? Then the slave trading Constitution is hoisted as a "founding" document? The same "constitution" that claims, in no uncertain terms, that anyone found to be resisting government tyranny will be crushed, and everyone will be made to pay for crushing out anyone failing to obey without question. So by this confusing logic what constitutes a "founding" document? Is a founding document the same "founding" document that afforded the central bankers all the leverage they needed to enforce their central banking fraud, and the extortion hidden as a tax required to create the demand for the central bank counterfeit money? That is a founding document? The founding document is also the order, to be obeyed without question, that subsidizes the crime of African Slavery? That is a founding document? What is being founded? The Bill of Rights that supposedly amended the subsidizing slave trading deal, on the other hand, was categorically opposed to the tyrannical Con Con of 1787, so what is being founded in these opposing documents? What is being founded but a despotic sandwich with meat in the middle carved from liberty lovers who dared to be the bread? "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness." What does that say? Anyone care to explain? "15: To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;" What does that say, exactly? Care to offer an example of what that means: exactly? "In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law." Anyone? Does anyone think anymore?
|
||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||