 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
"Yet, because of the core-belief of the right to bear arms — of the necessity to bear arms — against tyranny we resist common sense."
And according to my interpretation of what is offered by Michael Kelley "our" lack of common sense is exemplified this way:
"It seems to me a matter of common sense that we need a system of regulations for the manufacture, sale and use of firearms to reduce the number of injuries caused by individuals lacking these principles."
In the ancient common law are common sense concepts. Such as everyone is subject to the same laws all the time. If anyone ever has this idea in their head that someone else, but not me, must be regulated in some way, their behavior must be modified in some way, they must build a car, or gun, some way, or use either some way other than the way they alone decide to do, on their own authority, their own power of will, and their own compass called moral conscience, then said individual wanting to modify the behavior of someone else has at their disposal the law power, just like everyone else.
Go ahead and make people behave the way you want them to behave, Mike. Why don't you start with the weapons of mass destruction? Control those with the common sense that you have, the same common sense lacking in those people that worry you.
Criminal governments, or FAKE governments run by criminals, have racked up an impressive numbers of innocent people murdered, and that doesn't seem to worry you in proportion to this so called "gun violence = gun control" brainwashing consequence of criminals taking over governments. Why is that, a lack of relative proportion type common sense: mountains versus mole hills? Is it sphere of influence limitation? You may have influence locally, but not state wide, or nation wide, or world wide, so employ your limited power where it may actually accomplish something? Direct your energy at the "gun violence" problem only to the extend that in applies to people who might listen to what you consider to be reasonable solutions?
In the common sense, common law, every single effort by every single individual member of the voluntary association has the same power over the facts as everyone else, affording you as well as I all the power needed to fix any problem we see, and do so expediently. But that isn't the "government" you harken to when your "gun control" fix to what you perceive as a "gun violence" problem. You want the FAKE government to step in on your behalf and have them "do the right thing" according to your viewpoint, which makes sense to you, and relieves those worries about that lack of common sense exemplified in others: perhaps.
It is the FAKE government that began ignoring the real government (you, me, and everyone else) over 200 years ago, that solved their cheap labor problem with their African Slave trade solution. That same FAKE government continued to ignore the real government by solving their perceived Indian problem, or the problem of prime lands occupied by squatters, with their Final Solution to their Indian Problem. These are the FAKE government agents that always have a thirst for more power to destroy, to make weapons of mass destruction, to use weapons of mass destruction, to destroy millions upon millions of innocent people for what? Fun? Profit? Ask them, and be sure the answer will be honest and accurate, it is after all common sense that politicians are honest?
What then is the real law? Is it so hidden that normal people with normal, working, human conscience, can't find it with a microscope?
The real law is simply the truth, and the truth is that the real law can fix any human problem that can be fixed, despite the inevitable human errors. Falsehood goes the opposite direction on purpose, for some strange, unaccounted for, reason.