 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |  |
http://www.lawfulmoneytrust.com/
The Judiciary Act of 1789 has a description of admiralty process on Page 77 including, “…saving to suitors, in all cases the right of a common law remedy where the common law is competent to give it,”
This caught my eye, how we default into admiralty law whenever the common law is incompetent. The system of common law in America is in a nutshell, case law, or stare decisis. In this system the authority to practice law from the bench resides in county and municipal judges, what many people consider to be the bottom of the totem pole. True. But above them all the appellate judges are disallowed to practice law and must abide in “authority”. This authority is argued on appeal through case opinions or precedent. When this system is bonded and operating under the published constitutions, statutes and rules then it has been proven functional and competent to deliver justice
I just viewed the opening quote on LMT - the blog.
We should consider my $20M lien for a moment. When I billed the court I had not discovered the deviant oaths of office. But I knew something had gone awry. And this may be what your complaint about the 1789 Judiciary Act is about. Requiring "judges" to be Learned in the Law has since construed to be licensed by, in Colorado, the State Supreme Court.
A suitor dropped by the Secretary of State's office for a copy of the newly seated Attorney General's oath, about five months into his alleged term. There was none so he requested a Certificate of Fact that SUTHERS had not filed it. They were a little alarmed, "We don't give those out any more. We get in too much trouble." Wow!
They promised him to get the Certificate in the mail but called him on his way home and said they had SUTHERS' oath there for him to pick up in the morning. That is it.
The statute calls for "the ever-living God" to be on there. So we have the chief justice of the Bar Association, aka the State of Colorado Supreme Court in collusion with the criminal syndicalism.
I have the opening post there and you still direct some kind of accusation toward the Judiciary Act of 1789. I might pick through Page 1 again and see if there is any reconciling our views. I have the 1789 Act attached here through and you will find in it the Form of Oath for federal judges - So help me God.
SO HELP ME GOD. Is an alteration. Even putting it in italics is an alteration but it still holds the same grammatical meaning. Look on StSC:
What you have though is a slight alteration. Italics mean to me, this part is optional. So we refine the deviation - however this oath is still deviant from form and any other "judge" will rule for his Brethren...
Attachment: $20M lien.jpg (Downloaded 29 times)