 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Absolutes? No, the answer is not absolute as if the group (one thing) "is not" (will not, can not, absolutely not) going to help us (one thing) get closer toward shared, voluntary goals, such as averting another dark ages after another world wide trade war, and another world wide war.
Many people at National Liberty Alliance are working very well at replacing the many lies (counterfeit truth) with more accurate, useful, productive, defensive, powerful information, such as the true meaning or Rule of Law (due process, law of the land, legem terrae, common law, with trial by the country), while the lies destroy themselves, collapsing in on themselves, and again this is parallel to money.
Try this:
http://www.power-independence.com/forum/view_topic.php?id=791&forum_id=2
Especially relevant is the Worgle Austria example.
Counterfeit items counterfeit something real, and counterfeit items always destroy themselves, such as entropy relates to ectropy. So you have 4 basic fronts at work right now, and you know the financial one best.
1. The counterfeit financial system has run its course to the inevitable (planned) end result. You call it gold backwardation. There will be a replacement or there will be no more human beings alive, and the replacement will either be a return of the same counterfeit (monopoly rule by criminals) version, improved, adapted, but on the same Boom Bust Cycle, or there will be many replacements, all of which are competitively better than the nearest competitor, and all of which are accurate, or based upon elusive truth. A mix of all possibilities is what can be called The Prisoner's Dilemma also known as game theory.
See the app here on The Prisoner's Dilemma:
http://prisonersdilemma.sergehelfrich.eu/
2. Counterfeit Rule of Law, which is Rule by Criminals, which is a shared set of rules followed (without question) by those sharing this ideal set of rules shared by all criminals, and most of them are not even aware of these very simple criminal rules. Like rats on a sinking ship the rats eat each other until there is only 2 rats left, and the Criminals Rules (might makes right) inspires the more powerful rat to eat the less powerful rat, and this is inevitable because the rats share the counterfeit financial system which ends up with the same collapse of economy, which ends up with the same last 2 rats on the sinking ship, and the way to settle the rat problem (law) is the shared understanding that the more powerful rat consumes the less powerful rat. The replacement needed is to take the dick out of dictator and replace might makes right with the original version of Rule of Law, which is to reject any attempt by any individual (or individual group) to decide any matter of truth, or law, or fact, or remedy, or restitution, and instead to employ an adaptive, effective, method by which the whole country of people must agree unanimously on what is or is not fact, is or is not law, and is or is not restitution, remedy, or if absolutely necessary, what is or is not a just punishment: trial by jury according to the common law, in America, survives in (at least) the Bill of Rights.
3. Counterfeit information, which is also called half truths, which are deceptions based upon the basic Criminal Rule that is understandable by example, which is a thief intending to injure a victim and the thief invents and produces a NEWS bulletin, whereby the thief points and proclaims "There is a thief, right there, where I am pointing,," and while concerned, defensive, people are looking in the direction pointed out by the thief, said thief injures the innocent, targeted, victim. The replacement is, as a rule, accurate information, known as the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, and the tried and true method of validating the truth, in any case where an individual is potentially harmed by lies, false accusation, or demands for punishment is trial by jury according to the common law, here in America.
4. Counterfeit federation, which is known as Might make Right, Nationalism, Fascism, Socialism, Communism, Monarchy, Summary Justice, Rule by Criminal means, Monopoly, Tyranny, Despotism, on and on. Thieves change the meanings of words on a regular basis.
Case in point:
http://www.barefootsworld.net/antifederalist.html#afp03
"There are but two modes by which men are connected in society, the one which operates on individuals, this always has been, and ought still to be called, national government; the other which binds States and governments together (not corporations, for there is no considerable nation on earth, despotic, monarchical, or republican, that does not contain many subordinate corporations with various constitutions) this last has heretofore been denominated a league or confederacy. The term federalists is therefore improperly applied to themselves, by the friends and supporters of the proposed constitution. This abuse of language does not help the cause; every degree of imposition serves only to irritate, but can never convince. They are national men, and their opponents, or at least a great majority of them, are federal, in the only true and strict sense of the word. "
Case in point explained according to game theory (if you can connect the dots yourself):
http://www.amazon.com/Reclaiming-American-Revolution-Kentucky-Resolutions/dp/1403963037/ref=pd_sxp_redirect
"Second, federalism permits the states to operate as laboratories of democracy-to experiment with various policies and Programs. For example, if Tennessee wanted to provide a state-run health system for its citizens, the other 49 states could observe the effects of this venture on Tennessee's economy, the quality of care provided, and the overall cost of health care. If the plan proved to be efficacious other states might choose to emulate it, or adopt a plan taking into account any problems surfacing in Tennessee. If the plan proved to be a disastrous intervention, the other 49 could decide to leave the provision of medical care to the private sector. With national plans and programs, the national officials simply roll the dice for all 284 million people of the United States and hope they get things right.
Experimentation in policymaking also encourages a healthy competition among units of government and allows the people to vote with their feet should they find a law of policy detrimental to their interests. Using again the state-run health system as an example, if a citizen of Tennessee was unhappy with Tennessee's meddling with the provisions of health care, the citizen could move to a neighboring state. Reallocation to a state like North Carolina, with a similar culture and climate, would not be a dramatic shift and would be a viable option. Moreover, if enough citizens exercised this option, Tennessee would be pressured to abandon its foray into socialized medicine, or else lose much of its tax base. To escape a national health system, a citizen would have to emigrate to a foreign country, an option far less appealing and less likely to be exercised than moving to a neighboring state. Without competition from other units of government, the national government would have much less incentive than Tennessee would to modify the objectionable policy. Clearly, the absence of experimentation and competition hampers the creation of effective programs and makes the modification of failed national programs less likely."
Federation explained precisely:
http://teachingamericanhistory.org/ratification/elliot/vol1/approaches/
"That the question was not whether, by a declaration of independence, we should make ourselves what we are not; but whether we should declare a fact which already exists:
That, as to the people or Parliament of England, we had always been independent of them, their restraints on our trade deriving efficacy from our acquiescence only, and not from any rights they possessed of imposing them; and that, so far, our connection had been federal only, and was now dissolved by the commencement of hostilities:
That, as to the king, we had been bound to him by allegiance, but that this bond was now dissolved by his assent to the late act of Parliament, by which he declares us out of his protection, and by his levying war on usa fact which had long ago proved us out of his protection, it being a certain position in law, that allegiance and protection are reciprocal, the one ceasing when the other is withdrawn:"
National Liberty Alliance includes many people who know much more than I do about certain things. I think, however, that many people in that group were not, and are not, prepared to know the whole truth concerning when, how, and why the criminals took over America, and therefore many of them are ill prepared to defend against the latest generation of criminals who have inherited the States that were Captured this routine way.
I think that the next link, and the next quote may be a vital piece of the puzzle required:
http://xroads.virginia.edu/~hyper/JEFFERSON/ch14.html
"The state is divided into counties. In every county are appointed magistrates, called justices of the peace, usually from eight to thirty or forty in number, in proportion to the size of the county, of the most discreet and honest inhabitants. They are nominated by their fellows, but commissioned by the governor, and act without reward. These magistrates have jurisdiction both criminal and civil. If the question before them be a question of law only, they decide on it themselves: but if it be of fact, or of fact and law combined, it must be referred to a jury. In the latter case, of a combination of law and fact, it is usual for the jurors to decide the fact, and to refer the law arising on it to the decision of the judges. But this division of the subject lies with their discretion only. And if the question relate to any point of public liberty, or if it be one of those in which the judges may be suspected of bias, the jury undertake to decide both law and fact. If they be mistaken, a decision against right, which is casual only, is less dangerous to the state, and less afflicting to the loser, than one which makes part of a regular and uniform system. In truth, it is better to toss up cross and pile in a cause, than to refer it to a judge whose mind is warped by any motive whatever, in that particular case. But the common sense of twelve honest men gives still a better chance of just decision, than the hazard of cross and pile. These judges execute their process by the sheriff or coroner of the county, or by constables of their own appointment. If any free person commit an offence against the commonwealth, if it be below the degree of felony, he is bound by a justice to appear before their court, to answer it on indictment or information. If it amount to felony, he is committed to jail, a court of these justices is called; if they on examination think him guilty, they send him to the jail of the general court, before which court he is to be tried first by a grand jury of 24, of whom 13 must concur in opinion: if they find him guilty, he is then tried by a jury of 12 men of the county where the offence was committed, and by their verdict, which must be unanimous, he is acquitted or condemned without appeal."
What is needed in each county are these justices of the peace whereby all accusations by anyone against anyone are accusations that matter to all people everywhere, because the weakest among us are those who need our help the most, and so they must be heard, they must be represented, and their accusations must be validated. The problem of course is that there are many counterfeit accusations, and who handles any accusation now? An accuser who accuses someone of a crime, such as human trafficking, in a case like The Franklin Case, ends up having the accused in power to validate the accusation. When the accused is guilty is it likely that the accused, who has the exclusive power to validate accusations, will validate an accusation against his tyrannical self? The answer is clearly no.
Joe