 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |  |
1. Evgeny Fedorov. He is and was during Yeltsin times - an analog of your congressman. But back then he wasn't speaking out against obvious destructive motion of the government which served US interests. This kinda eats away at roots of his credibility and makes me think he most likely has agenda he doesn't make public. Even though now he's a member of ruling party - he helped install and help promote a new little party - he also introduces new law developed by them - most of which I actually support. Yet the way he conduct his interviews on the matter are very distinctly fearmongering and some position he consistently states throughout his interviews are no more than a made-up strong sounding accusations designed to upset. To his credibility goes the fact that his public interviews and such are not mainstream and are off the mainstream for the most part. I'm not sure it is wise to make projections whose interests he serves, but if for now he helps to do the right thing - I say let him do that.
As to the subject of that particular interview - again - fearmongering, US never stopped war against us, driven by desires of Social Parasites. I personally don't think that US has any chance of making it happen now - they could have 2-3 years ago, but with each passing day their chances of successfully starting an open war lower without possibility of going back up no matter whether they understand that. In a sense fearmongering is designed to mobilize some doubting minds I think.
2. I respect Fursov. He seems to be quite johnny on the spot. Even though I personally leave room for doubt - conventionally he explained the mess more or less suitably.
3. I've looked through some chapters of that and it seems to be a piled up info with some degree of structurization and thought put over about it. But certain chapters are a distinct example of not putting enough effort. For one - chapter 36 - Morality. Not sure how worth of time this book in entirety is, but at least I hope it provides some kind of reaching out and testing borders of traditional stupidity even if at points it reinforces them. I trust you are a self-conscious enough person to not be fooled by author's own stereotypes.