 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
My understanding of shame has to do with my understanding of conscience, whereby there can be a confusion caused by lies. If there is confusion caused by lies, then shame may be the result of doing good things, as if conscience is "providing the means by which we suffer" instead of doing the effective work that conscience is designed to accomplish effectively.
Cases in point:
1. I love to help other people, so when I do so it is a selfish act, because I love it.
Do I feel shame when I do things that I love to do, because I get such a huge reward (profit) for doing things that make me so happy?
What does it mean to be shamelessly selfish? Are you selfish? Do you not have any shame?
If I click on an advertizement on my Facebook page where there is a woman with large breasts in view, do I feel shame?
Yes, but I do it anyway.
I may be confused in that department.
I am not confused in the department whereby I love to help other people, so therefore I do not feel any shame when I seek out that PROFIT, that REWARD, of helping other people, even when there is no positive, or even when there is a negative, reaction to my efforts to help. I do not destroy my love of helping other people when I fail, rather, I work to find effective, rather than ineffective, ways to help other people.
What is a warrior?
What would a warrior look like in Liberty (where crime no longer paid so well)?
And yes, I did say those words out loud to the government trained lunch director, and many more. She may not want me to help anymore.
How will you know if you were helping?
I think decisions should be local.
In order to help, to me, I have to spell things out, and therefore I did spell things out, and I did so with a brief description of Point A and Point B.
Point A is not local. Point A is a Global Criminal Legal Money Monopoly POWER.
There is a local solution, in the sense that there will be (at Point B) loans between free traders, whereby the exchanges are equitable, not criminal.
I tried.
How will I know if I help?
I changed pharmacies to one which is locally owned and operated and decisions are made by the owner...in-house...within government regulations...of course.
In Liberty (borrowed from bear is the concept of being inside of Liberty) the term "government regulations" would be local, not "corporate," as those in Liberty would not be confusing Crime made Legal with self-government or voluntary government.
The criminals have long ago taken over the POWER of effective medical treatment, so why call it "government regulation" when speaking about orders from the criminals that are to be followed without question?
I think group think is too easily taken over by criminals who are shamelessly selfish, so much so they commit crimes because they are selfish.
An example of "group think" is to refer to criminal orders (that are to be followed without question) as being orders offered by people hired to maintain "government regulations".
An example of a government regulation is one that all the self-governors agree, voluntarily, to follow. Such as:
It is not lawful to murder babies in a church by burning them to death while they are still alive.
When a person says that the National Government is our government, my blood begins to boil.
Why make such an outrageous claim as to claim that the National Government is ours, in any way, any shape, or any form, whatsoever?
I can give you an example of group think.
I changed pharmacies to one which is locally owned and operated and decisions are made by the owner...in-house...within government regulations...of course.
What is government?
What does the word mean?
Where is the person sitting in the seat of power whereby that authority is ordering orders to be obeyed without question?
If the idea is to communicate accurately, then trial and error may work to reach that goal, if the goal can be reached, and if the goal cannot be reached, then what is the point, or the purpose, of "communicating"?
Group think?
If it makes a person happy to "help" other people in a church, to "help" them by burning them alive, then such a person may consider their own actions as being "helpful," since the babies being burned alive are having their souls used for a higher purpose? The "helper" who is happy about "helping" is actually, in their own mind, a generous person, and not at all selfish?
What can a misdirected person do other than harm, as they continue to provide the means by which they suffer?
What is the cost of the mountain of lies?
Why call criminals anything but criminals?
As to the book project, I am now finding it very difficult to follow your directions on where pages in your copy line up with pages in my copy.
Example:
I noticed page 151 of 174 starts lower on the page than normal.
That is right on my copy when opening the Word file. Page 151 of 174 is listed as page 141, and it is the Chapter OK. I moved the text up on the page to where it should be, like all the other pages in the book (as far as I know at this point).
Example 2:
On page 142 of 174, since we have removed Joe's Slaw recipe, can we add back bear's original Point which reads:
I found the quote needing to be changed but it was not listed as Page 142 of 174.
Depending upon where the page is while scrolling that quote is listed on Page 136 or 137 of 174 while I use Word to find that quote. The Page number is 127 which is the start of the chapter titled Joe's Law.
Now my copy reads:
Joe’s Law and Joe Slaw both take time to understand. One is hot and spicy with radishes, or so I hear…the other…provides a key to abundance. The recipe for Joe’s Law is shared below. If you want the recipe for Joe Slaw, you will have to ask Joe. Joe’s Law is used here to prove the point that the American public needs to create and begin using competitive forms of currency.
That is cut and pasted from the Word file.
This may be too much more power robbing work for you at this time.
I am trying to keep things orderly, because I have not yet resolved at least one thing. I resolved those things above, but not this:
Joe,
"Saying the nation of Israel will only be restored by Messiah and that the humanly done Zionism is not according to God’s Will."
That sentence out of its original context. Thank you for bringing it to my attention.
The original quote was http://www.dailypaul.com/259985/liberty-day-challenge-july-4th-2013-v2?page=1#comment-2829436 :
Joe, I still haven’t ironed out my understanding of the nation of Israel as determined by the United Nations in 1948. I see religious Jews here: http://www.dailypaul.com/256465/ahmadinejad-embraces-the-jew...
Saying the nation of Israel will only be restored by Messiah and that the humanly done Zionism is not according to God’s will. That is different than what I have understood and been taught my whole life. I don’t have the time to get to the bottom of it right now. I don’t understand the current dynamics between Israel and the Palestinians.
Should we use the complete quote? (Perhaps the first time on page 56 and then just a partial on page 57 since the context will have been established?
Adding more links to the INDEX appears to be required in this adjustment. That is OK, and I can then have the door open to add a few more links that are missing (but not a big deal) concerning other references like the Bill Clinton YouTube video where he says "It depends upon what is...is..."
No big deal, no rush, I'm just trying to organize things some, and that last thing in double lines appears to me to be one of the last things not yet adjusted.
The one other thing might be an additional response from the buyer in the Sale or No Sale transaction. If more is added to the book then I have to consider making another book cover .pdf since the book may be larger and wider. That can be done, and why not? I don't know how much more can be added, since it looks like a whole book could be added, whereby the seller and buyer require a lot more negotiating before a sale is finalized.