 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
I can get back to book work after responding to your latest, welcome, vital questions, as I share a need for accurate answers.
"Can a person use the word "we" when referring to the country they live in and the people they live with in that country?"
I ask people questions so as to find better answers since my answers are very likely to be not good enough, and example of a vital question is:
"How does anyone accurately discriminate between friend and foe?"
We are those who want to know that answer so as to disconnect from foes, if at all possible, so as never to be victims.
We are not those who want to know that answer so as to connect to fellow criminals who are then working cooperatively to injure innocent victims for fun and profit.
So...again...there are two worlds and if you are in one, this Liberty one, then the other one, that Criminal one, is foreign to you, a world apart.
It is in the best interest of Legal Criminals to have their victims confusing Liberty and Legal Crime, as if they are one and the same thing.
Is that what is happening in your case right now?
Do you think of yourself as part of a country? As in "we" Americans?
Since I've read Franks work on where the word America comes from, and the meaning is almost the same as a Sea of Lost Souls ready for Exploitation, then your question, in that context, is this:
Do I think of myself as a lost soul in a sea of lost souls whereby each lost soul is ever ready to be exploited by those who see America as a place where a new victim is born every minute?
The answer to that question is no.
I linked earlier links connecting you, me, and anyone else, to recorded evidence concerning the lives of two people, one named Pat Tillman, who was murdered, and one named Adam Kokesh, where Adam Kokesh is currently held captive by those who capture lost souls and exploit whatever can be exploited out of lost souls.
How do you tell friend from foe?
I consider myself to be on the side of those who finally realize that it is not a good idea to keep sending every kilowatt/hour of power earned to really evil people, and I think both Pat Tillman and Adam Kokesh have figured out similar things before the one was murdered, and that one was murdered because of his "change of heart," and the other one is now kidnapped, as far as I can tell, because of his "change of heart."
1.
Following criminal orders without question
2.
Resisting the following of criminal orders
3.
Fighting the Legal Criminals face to face
When I ran for congress I was fighting the legal criminals face to face, and those who know that their "votes" are not counted, know not to let anyone else in on the secret, so they pretend to vote, while they work to ensure that the criminals remain in power.
What is the meaning of the silence after "I agree with you, but-"?
I am a part of a force that is NOT willful investments in perpetuating a Legal Crime Monopoly Money Power and all the Torture and Mass Murder that is required, so as to have my fun, and my profits, at the expense of so many millions, and now billions of innocent victims (innocent in the specific and not ambiguous or abstract meaning).
We who willfully work to end up with abundant power instead of power scarcity forced upon the innocent are NOT in the same group as Legal Criminals.
So...how do you tell friend from foe?
How do you do so accurately?
I wonder if they consider themselves Americans?
I wonder if the Amish founding fathers figured out the same thing Frank figured out as to the entomology of the word America: sea of lost souls (or some other, similar, meaning).
I wouldn't know how to do a title search to get back to the allodial title.
Ask anyone who is seeking your signature on a document if they can help you get a Title Abstract or Abstract of Title, and tell them you want a complete one, not an incomplete one, and see, from that question, if you then find out how to "get back to the allodial title."
You are not "getting back to the allodial title," the idea is to confirm that the title you are buying is not false in ways that are on the record, such as a title that at one time was a Tax Lean Sale, which (according to the person in the link) is a source of trouble, which is not good, if you want "Fee Simple" or "Clear Title" or "Unencumbered Title" or a title that does not have a "cloud" on it, whereby you want something as close as possible to Allodial Title according to the current rules in force, pretty much world wide, or Nation Wide at least.
The link is not that difficult to understand, if the listener can remain awake, but the main point stressed was to complete a Title Abstract ( find the complete chain of title) recorded officially by those who will be judging any disputes that may arise against your claim of title, after you pay to get title, and the link stresses the importance of making sure that there are no Tax Lean Sales in that chain of title.
The link stresses that Title Insurance Companies do not necessarily (or not even often) track back the chain of title (they do not preform a complete Title Abstract) for reasons explained, and that means that YOU may be holding an unenforceable Title in a case where there was a Tax Lean Sale in the chain of title, where even Title Insurance Companies may not find such things as a Tax Lean Sale in the chain of title, and so you may be buying an empty bag.
If you are armed with this information then you can at least ask if the title search done is complete, and the secret hand shake type terminology for asking that question is Title Abstract, so as to end up with Allodial Title.
It is like saying, OK, do I really own the property, or is this "good enough for government work" as there has not been a complete title search done, there has not been a Title Abstract done, so there may be a Tax Lean Sale done somewhere along the line, and so there may be someone out there who can take me to court and get the title stolen from them back, or at least force me into court to pay fees in defense of my supposed claim on this land?
If they look at you funny, then they may not have a clue as to what you are saying, but the fact is that a Title Abstract is a real report of the full Chain of Title as far back as Land Patents, or even further back, depending upon the specific land, in the specific State, in this Involuntary Monopoly Union of Corporate States.
If there is a Tax Lean Sale, or who knows what other Land Mine, in the Chain of Title, then where would such a thing be recorded?
How would someone find where such things are recorded in the Chain of Title?
Do you want clear title, or is it good enough to buy an empty bag?
If there is a possible counter claim, such as someone who "lost" their property in a Tax Lean Sale, then such a counter claim (supposedly) must be recorded in that Chain of Title, or there is no counter claim, and if there is not counter claim, then you have the title free and clear, instead of having an empty bag.
The Cesars of the world have killing zones called Theaters. I wonder if that is a coincidence?
Do you want to hear the entomology of the word testimony according to Frank?
He can't completely accept my words when I say them, and then I find him repeating them like they were his.
That is funny. I worked for my brother for a long time, and we grew apart because of things happening at work, including his need to feel credit for being the boss, as I remember telling other workers, like me, about how things work in these Employee/Employer relationships.
I said that you have to approach them in a way that enables them to take credit of the idea that you want to implement, so that they can then have a light bulb moment, and the idea is their idea, and in that way the new way of doing things is implemented. If you insist on getting credit for the new idea, it is likely that the idea will never see the light of day at work.
I am looking forward to handing him a copy of Joe Quotes!
Be prepared for silence.
I have no idea what other people may, or may not, think about this new book you and I have created, but I am prepared for silence.