 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |  |
"... shown up with a greater use theory..."
Am I to take that as an insult to me? I am showing up with a "greater use theory"?
No, please do not take that as an insult. I was not meaning it that way. I am sorry that it sounded that way.
You know Joe, I think my problem is that all I can see is thru eyes that see everything turning out as crime in progress, and I have a problem fore-seeing how people following the Golden Rule can do things.
You are right. I should be asking How instead of Who and What. I read this today in the book. I think you afterword explains what I am asking, but I am not asking correctly. I am too busy seeing crime in progress and cannot see that things can be done differently.
The messages demanded by former victims of fraud are accurate descriptions of life after the damage inflicted by the perpetrators is overpowered and in the past. Meanwhile the suffering continues daily. The record of abuse grows from small to large, and the victims begin to find cause to share their individual stories. Similarities are discovered, and the need for remedy is realized in time.
Where is that information describing life after Legal Crime?
What will life look like after the victims shed the deceptive need to perpetuate investments in unspeakable crimes made legal?
What happens when power is no longer willfully consumed in the work required to make a few people more powerful than everyone else, and what happens when instead of crime being made legal that power is employed into making power abundant for all?