 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |  |
I have a question (imagine that).
Regarding this:
1. "If one is forced into a collective situation, as far as I can understand, they are no longer sovereign."
2. “If one [victim] is [willfully] forced [by a criminal to make the victim less powerful, so as to make the criminal more powerful], as far as I can understand, [the victim is] no longer sovereign [by that exact measure of that power being transferred that inequitable way, precisely, as it happens in time and place].”
Number 1 is my sentence. Number 2 is your modification to my sentence.
This is my question: Are criminals the only people who will force other people into involuntary situations?
I am asking this because when you say:
“If one [victim] is [willfully] forced [by a criminal to make the victim less powerful, so as to make the criminal more powerful]..."
It makes me wonder, Do you think people should be forced into situations for their own good in order to make them more powerful?
I ask this question because number 2 leaves that option.