 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
bear,
I think you are doing the fine work that is required to make a book worth reading.
I am following along on the improvements, and I found a possible additional improvement in this:
To me, this falls again into the category of two different worlds where you and I are targets because we produce more than we consume. That is uncontroversial if there is a net sheet known as the Federal Tax "Liabilities" and our world is driven by equitable thoughts and actions: The Golden Rule, morality, spirituality (whatever word works best in any case in this type of productive world).
To be more precise there is a problem I see here:
That is uncontroversial if there is a net sheet known as the Federal Tax "Liabilities" and <------------- here
It could be disconnected further so as not to confuse.
Such as:
To me, this falls again into the category of two different worlds where you and I are targets because we produce more than we consume. That "debt" based world is uncontroversial since there is a net sheet known as the Federal Tax "Liabilities" proving the fact. Our productive world, on the other hand, is driven by equitable thoughts and actions: The Golden Rule, morality, spirituality (whatever word works best in any case in this type of productive world).
It could be arranged better, but I think that there was a problem with the flow of perspective when the two worlds collided in the sentence.