 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
bear,
I took the information off this Forum because that cut and paste included my username and password to gain access to Submissions.
I submitted the Collapse or Opportunity article and I have not received any response to that submission, as far as I know.
I just sent this to those people:
Team,
I sent a submission, and I have uses for that submission. I use what I write on Forums. If there is a way I can link your site, where my submission is published, then I could link your site where my submission is published.
Absent any information concerning your use of my words I see no need to continue submitting my words into what is to me a dead end at this point.
In fact I will publish my submission to you as an example of how information travels in modern times.
Here is where I find a use for my submission to you:
http://www.dailypaul.com/291071/lindsey-williams-you-positively-must-get-out-of-paper
That is at the moment a source of information that is ONE WAY communication. In other words, there are no responses, no discussion, no feedback, no effort to challenge, to improve upon, or to check, and to balance, that information. So I see a use for my submission to your Team.
I will publish my submission to your Team, without a link to your On-Line Magazine, since at this point there is perceived by me an opportunity to challenge, improve, and offer productive information in the face of so much Dictatorial Information, and I can do so right at that point in the stream of information.
I can delay my effort to publish my offering of a competitive perspective. I can do so because I prefer to link a Web Site with the potential to challenge the Dictatorial Norm. If you can't use my words, I can.
Thanks
Joe
I have another submission already roughly written and I see no reason to continue sending my work to a place that does not offer feedback, at least on The Daily Paul Forum I get the occasional reply to my work.
You exemplify such feedback, to my work, from my end, from your end it is a mutual benefit, it is two way communication, or equitable commerce, which is agreement, competition, adaptation, and it is not Monopoly, Dictation, One-Way communication.
Someone else at The Daily Paul inspired me to offer a lot of information all arranged into neat order, and that person had offered a lot of information, and so there was again an example of how that works that way.
Here:
Unorthodox Methods of Discussion
If the game Monopoly was combined with the game Risk what would the skills being developed be with that combination?
Monopoly teaches the value of enforcing scarcity.
Risk teaches the value of enforcing scarcity.
Both involve the scarcity of land use.
Does that make sense?