 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |  |
Does proof matter in cases of disagreement whereby there is a question of guilt of any kind whatsoever?
Innocent until proven guilty by a court of law…Proof does matter.
So in regards to:
(b)
Except as provided by Subsection (c), an operator who does not exhibit evidence of financial responsibility under Subsection (a) is presumed to have operated the vehicle in violation of subsection 601.015.
Is a presumption of guilt allowable? How does one ever appear in a court of law if there is not a presumption of guilt? I am not arguing. I am sorting things out in my mind. I have always understood “innocent until proven guilty by a court of law.” Didn’t we hear that 100 million times one 1 Adam 12? Did you watch that show when you were a kid?
Is the point that one should not have to show those insurance papers, etc, until an accident has taken place? No wonder our foreign policy is to strike before struck. Is that not what is happening every day during traffic stops? Should we just wait for people to have an accident and not be able to pay for their damages? Is liability insurance a payment made to the guy with a baseball bat? Pay up or you cannot operate a vehicle? But if you pay up and you have a wreck, well then, we will take care of the damages? Pay up or else?
I don’t know Joe, these ideas are new to me. I have handed my cards over the 3 times since 16 that I have been stopped…2 times for speeding, 1 time for turning from the wrong lane. I was guilty of braking traffic laws all 3 times and I knew it before the lights and sirens were turned on.
That being said, that does not give the officer a license to suspend the constitution or Miranda rights, assuming that is what happened.
You know the guy they were looking for in the red stocking cap? Now he is innocent until proven guilty, but the story has it that he was visiting with a family the day before and while the parents were at work the next day, he kicked down the back door of the house and raped their 11 year old daughter. So, I am having trouble now as I think of the 11 year old girl, who may or maynot be a “woman of the world.” So, what give the police the right to pick up the guy? His victim identified him? I don’t know. So now he goes to court and stands trial. His word against her word? I suppose her physical damages are also a witness. Perhaps his DNA is a witness too. So, he will be proven guilty in a court of law. But something had to incriminate him. He must have been presumed guilty to be picked up by the Sheriff. How does that work?
-------------------------------------
Is there a goal to be reached in that use of my power?
I ask for a reason that is not an excuse, or a dodge, or a prejudice, I ask so as to test to see if I do reach the goal, or falling short of the goal I can confirm that I have fallen short of the goal.
Yes, my goal is that you might see Jesus through the eyes of a child…a simple story. Is faith abject believe in falsehood?
Jesus said this as reported by Luke: 15 And they brought unto him also infants, that he would touch them: but when his disciples saw it, they rebuked them. 16 But Jesus called them unto him, and said, Suffer little children to come unto me, and forbid them not: for of such is the kingdom of God. 17 Verily I say unto you, Who soever shall not receive the kingdom of God as a little child shall in no wise enter therein.
Is believing the Bible to be Inspired by God abject believe in falsehood?
Jesus quoted the Old Testament and called it the Word of God:
• Matthew 4:4 KJV
But he answered and said, It is written, Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God.
• Matthew 4:6 KJV
And [Satan] saith unto him, If thou be the Son of God, cast thyself down: for it is written, He shall give his angels charge concerning thee: and in their hands they shall bear thee up, lest at any time thou dash thy foot against a stone.
• Matthew 4:7 KJV
Jesus said unto him, It is written again, Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God
• Matthew 4:10 KJV
Then saith Jesus unto him, Get thee hence, Satan: for it is written, Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve
.
Jesus says, “It is written…” multiple times in other places in the Bible: http://beta.biblestudytools.com/search/?q=it+is+written&c=gos&t=kjv&ps=10&s=Bibles
So, my goal, my goal is that you might have eyes that see and ears that hear and seek as a little child. Yes, God knows where to find you, and He already has. Did he not send me to speak of Him?
"God took the punishment of OUR sin upon HIMSELF."
That makes no sense to me.
Why is God in the punishment business?
If God does not want to punish, then God can invent any reason not to punish, why does God need to punish "HIMSELF"?
Joe, God is righteous. God is holy. God is Just. God is a consuming fire. We are not. Because He is, all sin receives its just reward. What is the reward for sin? The lake of fire is the reward for sin. All sin will receive its reward there. God loves you Joe. That is why God took your reward upon Himself. It was the only way for justice to be served in the face of righteous holiness.
Will that video explain to me why God is in the punishment business, assuming that God is, in fact, in the punishment business?
So will I find some measure of proof, something reasonable, something I can believe, concerning why God is, in fact, in the punishment business?
Joe, I hope so.
Did you reach the intended goal of seeing why authority on paper, where the paper says that the paper itself is the authority, is an example of false authority?
So, which paper is the authority? The law code? Or the document that is to be produced so as not to be assumed guilty? Is it the law code written upon a piece of paper that sets itself up as judge and jury? Is that what you are trying to get me to see regarding the Bible? It is printed words on paper setting itself up as the authority?
Is the Creator the authority? If the Creator is righteous, holy, and just is not what that Creator writes upon a piece of paper Righteous, Holy and Just as well? The Creator Himself took your wages of sin upon Himself to delivery you from the paycheck due each time the sin time clock is punched.
If a criminal writes words upon a piece of paper, are those words then the transport of crime in progress? Satan has written all over God’s Creation, “mine, mine, mine.” But the final choice is yours, Joe, as God says, will you be mine instead? Will you come as a child and believe My Word?
God has explained everything there and not one jot and not one tittle will pass away without being fulfilled.
So, I asked you to watch a children’s drama about Jesus. Hoping that maybe, those words there and those pictures there might give a glimmer of what I try to explain ever so poorly.
If the paper says that it is illegal to breath, and the paper says that those found guilty must be executed on the spot, and the proof of guilt is the paper itself, then that is exactly what that is, false authority, right there on that paper, so that paper is, in fact, inculpatory evidence of fraud, so who is the author?
There will be a day when a mark on the hand or forehead will be required to buy or sell. If one does not have that mark, they will be punished. Who will write those rules? Who has told us those rules will be written? I joked at Walmart today about the self-check out and someday being able to scan the back of my hand so that no one will need to assist me. The 2 clerks looked at each other in a telltale way and acknowledged my comment with the fact that there are other (non Walmart) stores already doing that. Makes me think…perhaps that is why they cleanse the population of Christians as the routine is worked…we will not take the mark. Getting rid of the opposition beforehand?.
So, the other thing I have asked to listen to is Cooper’s Mystery Babylon series. The reason is because it puts into words who and what is behind this global criminal element. He also talked about an androgynous God as being part of that system. I think I heard that information in episode 3 or 4. You read Sutton. Did Sutton give you the method to alleviate the criminal element? Cooper doesn’t either. But it is information. Just like Sutton is information. Sutton’s Wall street Analysis and Cooper’s Spiritual Analysis perhaps go hand in hand? I am very piggish with Joes time. Cooper’s series starts here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2iCLykzJ0d8&list=PL11E33A6AEEB2674F
More important though, to me, is http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tV1HCK5yO_o
But bear being a pig wants Joe to listen to all of them
--------------------
I am going to rest abit before answering your latest welcome reply which was separated from the first one because the forum wouldn't let you edit. It may be tomorrow. I am playing Mom Taxi all week long, and I am only home for a couple of hours this afternoon before I have to start driving again. The youngest has a 9pm baseball game tonight as well.
...