 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | |
| Location: | |
| Posts: | |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |  |
Suffice to say that a potentially valuable student could be connected to a potentially valuable education more regularly, more abundantly, if a mechanism was in use (competition) by which investors were fighting over each other to pay the student the most money to get the students inspired to learn by that reward for that effort.
I thought competition was in place in the form of dollars per hour that the student is worth based upon the type of education the student completed. At least that was the way it used to be...when my dad went to school and was able to pay his way thru school by sacking groceries. That was before a college education cost $50K a year give or take.
But isn't the competition supposed to be in the hand of the student, not in the hand of the employer? Isn't that what supposedly made us a free society. Everyone was able to rise to the top based upon their own hard work and labor and not being dependent or beholden to an employer to provide that opportunity?
Those were the days before 60% in taxes and regulations skimmed from the pockets of Americans...and before the debt clock that explifies holes in the pockets of the wage earner which will never be patched as their hard work and labor fall thru thoughs holes and into the coffers of...the slave owners.