 |
PM |  | |
Quote | | |
Reply | | |
Full Topic | |
| Joined: | Mon Nov 21st, 2005 |
| Location: | California USA |
| Posts: | 6399 |
| Status: |
Offline
|
| Mana: |    |
Talkshoe 1
I have other things to do right now but I want to continue from the moment the person speaking at time 09:47 identifies a severe error concerning the process of Establishing Standing.
I think this may be a KEY, a very important turning point, or intersection in the road, and it may be a good idea to find out which way to go from that point.
When the judge "runs away" from an person Establishing Standing in Uniform Commercial Code the judge will return with Canon or Maritime Jurisdiction to retake possession of the targeted victim, or so that is what I think the person speaking in Talkshoe 1 is saying.
The wrong thing to do, apparently, is to think that the judge running away is giving up, as was the message I got in that Youtube video.
Here is the judge running away in a Youtube video again:
Youtube Judge calling recess
Time 13:50 the speaker in Talkshoe Episode 1 I can't hear the words.
Here is another direct link to Episode 1:
Episode 1
The 3 levels of Color of Law (Legal Crime perpetrated in America) are Uniform Commercial Code, the lowest level, then Maritime Law or Admiralty Law, and then Talmudic Law, but I can't hear the words used to label Talmudic Law.
At time 13:50 the speaker says:
Now if you really want to gamble at the third level and you don't know what's going on, then under Talmudic Law the penalties of ________Law are pretty, well, let's just say, I mean, the penalty of breaking _________Law, if you look at Wikipedia is death.
Got it with Google correcting the spelling.
Google this: Talmudic noahide laws
Wiki:
The Talmud laid down the statutory punishment for transgressing any one of the Seven Laws of Noah (but not other parts of the Noahide code) as capital punishment [22] by decapitation, which is considered one of the lightest[23] of the four modes of execution of criminals. According to some opinions, punishment is the same whether the individual transgresses with knowledge of the law or is ignorant of the law.[24]
Speaker in Episode 1 says when the "judge" is calling recess, it is an offer and a real human being, a person, may want to object to the offer.
This is really looking like the place where the rubber meets the road in this battle between Common Law or Liberty and Legal Crime or what, you tell me what to call it.
What does the word "Equity" mean from the viewpoint of this Maritime/Talmudic/Noahide/Law perspective?
In Episode 1 at time 21:40 (or so) are words describing the 2 elements of Standing.
1.
Competence
2.
Holding Property
Then the speaker speaks words that sound to me as if there is a counterfeit version of holding property and he uses the word "equity".
I'll try to quote:
"Most people don't hold property rights, they might think they do, but they don't, they hold equity."
Does that mean that most people are not Establishing Standing?